Literature DB >> 22762987

Maintenance of genomic integrity after DNA double strand breaks in the human prostate and seminal vesicle epithelium: the best and the worst.

Sari Jäämaa1, Marikki Laiho.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer is one of the most frequent cancer types in men, and its incidence is steadily increasing. On the other hand, primary seminal vesicle carcinomas are extremely rare with less than 60 cases reported worldwide. Therefore the difference in cancer incidence has been estimated to be more than a 100,000-fold. This is astonishing, as both tissues share similar epithelial structure and hormonal cues. Clearly, the two epithelia differ substantially in the maintenance of genomic integrity, possibly due to inherent differences in their DNA damage burden and DNA damage signaling. The DNA damage response evoked by DNA double strand breaks may be relevant, as their faulty repair has been implicated in the formation of common genomic rearrangements such as TMPRSS2-ERG fusions during prostate carcinogenesis. Here, we review DNA damaging processes of both tissues with an emphasis on inflammation and androgen signaling. We discuss how benign prostate and seminal vesicle epithelia respond to acute DNA damage, focusing on the canonical DNA double strand break-induced ATM-pathway, p53 and DNA damage induced checkpoints. We propose that the prostate might be more prone to the accumulation of genetic aberrations during epithelial regeneration than seminal vesicles due to a weaker ability to enforce DNA damage checkpoints.
Copyright © 2012 Federation of European Biochemical Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22762987      PMCID: PMC3439595          DOI: 10.1016/j.molonc.2012.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Oncol        ISSN: 1574-7891            Impact factor:   6.603


  79 in total

1.  Recurrent fusion of TMPRSS2 and ETS transcription factor genes in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Scott A Tomlins; Daniel R Rhodes; Sven Perner; Saravana M Dhanasekaran; Rohit Mehra; Xiao-Wei Sun; Sooryanarayana Varambally; Xuhong Cao; Joelle Tchinda; Rainer Kuefer; Charles Lee; James E Montie; Rajal B Shah; Kenneth J Pienta; Mark A Rubin; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Seminal vesicle invasion in radical prostatectomies: which is the most common route of invasion?

Authors:  Athanase Billis; Daniel A Teixeira; Rafael F Stelini; Maísa M Quintal; Marbele S Guimarães; Ubirajara Ferreira
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  The DNA damage response: ten years after.

Authors:  J Wade Harper; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 4.  Dealing with DNA damage: relationships between checkpoint and repair pathways.

Authors:  Daniël O Warmerdam; Roland Kanaar
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  DNA damage triggers a prolonged p53-dependent G1 arrest and long-term induction of Cip1 in normal human fibroblasts.

Authors:  A Di Leonardo; S P Linke; K Clarkin; G M Wahl
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1994-11-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 6.  Inflammation in prostate carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Angelo M De Marzo; Elizabeth A Platz; Siobhan Sutcliffe; Jianfeng Xu; Henrik Grönberg; Charles G Drake; Yasutomo Nakai; William B Isaacs; William G Nelson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  A molecular analysis of prokaryotic and viral DNA sequences in prostate tissue from patients with prostate cancer indicates the presence of multiple and diverse microorganisms.

Authors:  Karen S Sfanos; Jurga Sauvageot; Helen L Fedor; James D Dick; Angelo M De Marzo; William B Isaacs
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 4.104

8.  53BP1 promotes non-homologous end joining of telomeres by increasing chromatin mobility.

Authors:  Nadya Dimitrova; Yi-Chun M Chen; David L Spector; Titia de Lange
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-10-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Safeguarding genome integrity: the checkpoint kinases ATR, CHK1 and WEE1 restrain CDK activity during normal DNA replication.

Authors:  Claus Storgaard Sørensen; Randi G Syljuåsen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Positive regulation of DNA double strand break repair activity during differentiation of long life span cells: the example of adipogenesis.

Authors:  Aline Meulle; Bernard Salles; Danièle Daviaud; Philippe Valet; Catherine Muller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Prediagnosis aspirin use, DNA methylation, and mortality after breast cancer: A population-based study.

Authors:  Tengteng Wang; Lauren E McCullough; Alexandra J White; Patrick T Bradshaw; Xinran Xu; Yoon Hee Cho; Mary Beth Terry; Susan L Teitelbaum; Alfred I Neugut; Regina M Santella; Jia Chen; Marilie D Gammon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  DNA Damage Response in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Matthew J Schiewer; Karen E Knudsen
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 3.  Maintenance of genomic integrity after DNA double strand breaks in the human prostate and seminal vesicle epithelium: the best and the worst.

Authors:  Sari Jäämaa; Marikki Laiho
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 6.603

4.  Evolution: Back to the future to understand and control prostate cancer.

Authors:  Donald S Coffey
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2015-04-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.