Literature DB >> 18931659

53BP1 promotes non-homologous end joining of telomeres by increasing chromatin mobility.

Nadya Dimitrova1, Yi-Chun M Chen, David L Spector, Titia de Lange.   

Abstract

Double-strand breaks activate the ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase, which promotes the accumulation of DNA damage factors in the chromatin surrounding the break. The functional significance of the resulting DNA damage foci is poorly understood. Here we show that 53BP1 (also known as TRP53BP1), a component of DNA damage foci, changes the dynamic behaviour of chromatin to promote DNA repair. We used conditional deletion of the shelterin component TRF2 (also known as TERF2) from mouse cells (TRF2(fl/-)) to deprotect telomeres, which, like double-strand breaks, activate the ATM kinase, accumulate 53BP1 and are processed by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Deletion of TRF2 from 53BP1-deficient cells established that NHEJ of dysfunctional telomeres is strongly dependent on the binding of 53BP1 to damaged chromosome ends. To address the mechanism by which 53BP1 promotes NHEJ, we used time-lapse microscopy to measure telomere dynamics before and after their deprotection. Imaging showed that deprotected telomeres are more mobile and sample larger territories within the nucleus. This change in chromatin dynamics was dependent on 53BP1 and ATM but did not require a functional NHEJ pathway. We propose that the binding of 53BP1 near DNA breaks changes the dynamic behaviour of the local chromatin, thereby facilitating NHEJ repair reactions that involve distant sites, including joining of dysfunctional telomeres and AID (also known as AICDA)-induced breaks in immunoglobulin class-switch recombination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18931659      PMCID: PMC2613650          DOI: 10.1038/nature07433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  26 in total

1.  Self-excising retroviral vectors encoding the Cre recombinase overcome Cre-mediated cellular toxicity.

Authors:  D P Silver; D M Livingston
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  DNA damage foci at dysfunctional telomeres.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Takai; Agata Smogorzewska; Titia de Lange
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-09-02       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Accumulation of checkpoint protein 53BP1 at DNA breaks involves its binding to phosphorylated histone H2AX.

Authors:  Irene M Ward; Kay Minn; Katherine G Jorda; Junjie Chen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Cell cycle control of telomere protection and NHEJ revealed by a ts mutation in the DNA-binding domain of TRF2.

Authors:  Akimitsu Konishi; Titia de Lange
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  MDC1 is required for the intra-S-phase DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Michal Goldberg; Manuel Stucki; Jacob Falck; Damien D'Amours; Dinah Rahman; Darryl Pappin; Jiri Bartek; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-02-27       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  MDC1 is a mediator of the mammalian DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Grant S Stewart; Bin Wang; Colin R Bignell; A Malcolm R Taylor; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-02-27       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  MDC1 is coupled to activated CHK2 in mammalian DNA damage response pathways.

Authors:  Zhenkun Lou; Katherine Minter-Dykhouse; Xianglin Wu; Junjie Chen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-02-27       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  p53 Binding protein 53BP1 is required for DNA damage responses and tumor suppression in mice.

Authors:  Irene M Ward; Kay Minn; Jan van Deursen; Junjie Chen
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  53BP1 functions in an ATM-dependent checkpoint pathway that is constitutively activated in human cancer.

Authors:  Richard A DiTullio; Tamara A Mochan; Monica Venere; Jirina Bartkova; Maxwell Sehested; Jiri Bartek; Thanos D Halazonetis
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 28.824

10.  Histone deacetylase 4 interacts with 53BP1 to mediate the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Gary D Kao; W Gillies McKenna; Matthew G Guenther; Ruth J Muschel; Mitchell A Lazar; Tim J Yen
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2003-03-31       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  302 in total

1.  Lamins reach out to novel functions in DNA damage repair.

Authors:  Andreas Brachner; Roland Foisner
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Increased mobility of double-strand breaks requires Mec1, Rad9 and the homologous recombination machinery.

Authors:  Vincent Dion; Véronique Kalck; Chihiro Horigome; Benjamin D Towbin; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2012-04-08       Impact factor: 28.824

3.  Transcription regulates telomere dynamics in human cancer cells.

Authors:  Rajika Arora; Catherine M Brun; Claus M Azzalin
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 4.942

Review 4.  Origin of chromosomal translocations in lymphoid cancer.

Authors:  André Nussenzweig; Michel C Nussenzweig
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  Double-strand break repair: 53BP1 comes into focus.

Authors:  Stephanie Panier; Simon J Boulton
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 6.  Role of 53BP1 in the regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice.

Authors:  Arun Gupta; Clayton R Hunt; Sharmistha Chakraborty; Raj K Pandita; John Yordy; Deepti B Ramnarain; Nobuo Horikoshi; Tej K Pandita
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  The histone variant macroH2A1.1 is recruited to DSBs through a mechanism involving PARP1.

Authors:  Chang Xu; Ye Xu; Ozge Gursoy-Yuzugullu; Brendan D Price
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 4.124

8.  Protein phosphatase 5 regulates the function of 53BP1 after neocarzinostatin-induced DNA damage.

Authors:  Yoonsung Kang; Jung-Hee Lee; Nguyen Ngoc Hoan; Hong-Moon Sohn; In-Youb Chang; Ho Jin You
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  Kinases that control the cell cycle in response to DNA damage: Chk1, Chk2, and MK2.

Authors:  H Christian Reinhardt; Michael B Yaffe
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 8.382

10.  Replication stress induces genome-wide copy number changes in human cells that resemble polymorphic and pathogenic variants.

Authors:  Martin F Arlt; Jennifer G Mulle; Valerie M Schaibley; Ryan L Ragland; Sandra G Durkin; Stephen T Warren; Thomas W Glover
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.