Literature DB >> 12009173

Pitch and loudness interact in auditory displays: can the data get lost in the map?

John G Neuhoff1, Gregory Kramer, Joseph Wayand.   

Abstract

Many auditory displays use acoustic attributes such as frequency, intensity, and spectral content to represent different characteristics of multidimensional data. This study demonstrated a perceptual interaction between dynamic changes in pitch and loudness, as well as perceived asymmetries in directional acoustic change, that distorted the data relations represented in an auditory display. Three experiments showed that changes in loudness can influence pitch change, that changes in pitch can influence loudness change, and that increases in acoustic intensity are judged to change more than equivalent decreases. Within a sonification of stock market data, these characteristics created perceptual distortions in the data set. The results suggest that great care should be exercised when using lower level acoustic dimensions to represent multidimensional data.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12009173     DOI: 10.1037//1076-898x.8.1.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl        ISSN: 1076-898X


  10 in total

1.  Facilitating masked visual target identification with auditory oddball stimuli.

Authors:  Mary Kim Ngo; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Sing that tune: infants' perception of melody and lyrics and the facilitation of phonetic recognition in songs.

Authors:  Gina C Lebedeva; Patricia K Kuhl
Journal:  Infant Behav Dev       Date:  2010-05-15

Review 3.  Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: a review.

Authors:  Roland Sigrist; Georg Rauter; Robert Riener; Peter Wolf
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

4.  Loudness affects motion: asymmetric volume of auditory feedback results in asymmetric gait in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Julia Reh; Gerd Schmitz; Tong-Hun Hwang; Alfred O Effenberg
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 2.562

Review 5.  Medical audible alarms: a review.

Authors:  Judy Edworthy
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Is relative pitch specific to pitch?

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Andriana J Lehr; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-12

7.  Vocal responses to perturbations in voice auditory feedback in individuals with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Emily Q Wang; Leo Verhagen Metman; Charles R Larson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Perception of visual apparent motion is modulated by a gap within concurrent auditory glides, even when it is illusory.

Authors:  Qingcui Wang; Lu Guo; Ming Bao; Lihan Chen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-19

9.  Sonification of network traffic flow for monitoring and situational awareness.

Authors:  Mohamed Debashi; Paul Vickers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Frequency Fitting Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithm in Cochlear Implant Users with Bimodal Binaural Hearing.

Authors:  Alexis Saadoun; Antoine Schein; Vincent Péan; Pierrick Legrand; Ludwig Serge Aho Glélé; Alexis Bozorg Grayeli
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-02-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.