Literature DB >> 31484650

A regional massive hemorrhage protocol developed through a modified Delphi technique.

Jeannie L Callum1, Calvin H Yeh2, Andrew Petrosoniak2, Mark J McVey2, Stephanie Cope2, Troy Thompson2, Victoria Chin2, Keyvan Karkouti2, Avery B Nathens2, Kimmo Murto2, Suzanne Beno2, Jacob Pendergrast2, Andrew McDonald2, Russell MacDonald2, Neill K J Adhikari2, Asim Alam2, Donald Arnold2, Lee Barratt2, Andrew Beckett2, Sue Brenneman2, Hina Razzaq Chaudhry2, Allison Collins2, Margaret Harvey2, Jacinthe Lampron2, Clarita Margarido2, Amanda McFarlan2, Barto Nascimento2, Wendy Owens2, Menaka Pai2, Sandro Rizoli2, Theodora Ruijs2, Robert Skeate2, Teresa Skelton2, Michelle Sholzberg2, Kelly Syer2, Jami-Lynn Viveiros2, Josee Theriault2, Alan Tinmouth2, Rardi Van Heest2, Susan White2, Michelle Zeller2, Katerina Pavenski2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A massive hemorrhage protocol (MHP) enables rapid delivery of blood components in a patient who is exsanguinating pending definitive hemorrhage control, but there is variability in MHP implementation rates, content and compliance owing to challenges presented by infrequent activation, variable team performance and patient acuity. The goal of this project was to identify the key evidence-based principles and quality indicators required to develop a standardized regional MHP.
METHODS: A modified Delphi consensus technique was performed in the spring and summer of 2018. Panellists used survey links to independently review and rate (on a 7-point Likert scale) 43 statements and 8 quality indicators drafted by a steering committee composed of transfusion medicine specialists and technologists, and trauma physicians. External stakeholder input from all hospitals in Ontario was sought.
RESULTS: Three rounds were held with 36 experts from diverse clinical backgrounds. Consensus was reached for 42 statements and 8 quality indicators. Additional modifications from external stakeholders were incorporated to form the foundation for the proposed MHP.
INTERPRETATION: This MHP template will provide the basis for the design of an MHP toolkit, including specific recommendations for pediatric and obstetrical patients, and for hospitals with limited availability of blood components or means to achieve definitive hemorrhage control. We believe that harmonization of MHPs in our region will simplify training, increase uptake of evidence-based interventions, enhance communication, improve patient comfort and safety, and, ultimately, improve patient outcomes. Copyright 2019, Joule Inc. or its licensors.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31484650      PMCID: PMC6726467          DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20190042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ Open        ISSN: 2291-0026


  102 in total

Review 1.  Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: Recommendations based on a methodological systematic review.

Authors:  Saskia Jünger; Sheila A Payne; Jenny Brine; Lukas Radbruch; Sarah G Brearley
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.762

2.  Hospitals with more-active participation in conducting standardized in-situ mock codes have improved survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest.

Authors:  Karen Josey; Marshall L Smith; Arooj S Kayani; Geoff Young; Michael D Kasperski; Patrick Farrer; Richard Gerkin; Andreas Theodorou; Robert A Raschke
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 5.262

3.  Pregnancy-Related Mortality in the United States, 2011-2013.

Authors:  Andreea A Creanga; Carla Syverson; Kristi Seed; William M Callaghan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Checklists and multidisciplinary team performance during simulated obstetric hemorrhage.

Authors:  G Hilton; K Daniels; S N Goldhaber-Fiebert; S Lipman; B Carvalho; A Butwick
Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.603

5.  Shock index, pediatric age-adjusted (SIPA) is more accurate than age-adjusted hypotension for trauma team activation.

Authors:  Shannon N Acker; Brooke Bredbeck; David A Partrick; Ann M Kulungowski; Carlton C Barnett; Denis D Bensard
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Group O RBCs: where is universal donor blood being used.

Authors:  R L Barty; M Pai; Y Liu; D M Arnold; R J Cook; M P Zeller; N M Heddle
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 2.144

7.  The impact of hypothermia on outcomes in massively transfused patients.

Authors:  Erica Louise Walsh Lester; Erin E Fox; John B Holcomb; Karen J Brasel; Eileen M Bulger; Mitchell J Cohen; Bryan A Cotton; Timothy C Fabian; Jeffery D Kerby; Terrence OʼKeefe; Sandro B Rizoli; Thomas M Scalea; Martin A Schreiber; Kenji Inaba
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 3.313

Review 8.  The effects of mild perioperative hypothermia on blood loss and transfusion requirement.

Authors:  Suman Rajagopalan; Edward Mascha; Jie Na; Daniel I Sessler
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  The confusion continues: results from an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma survey on massive transfusion practices among United States trauma centers.

Authors:  Eric Etchill; Jason Sperry; Brian Zuckerbraun; Louis Alarcon; Joshua Brown; Kevin Schuster; Lewis Kaplan; Greta Piper; Andrew Peitzman; Matthew D Neal
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Protocol for a phase III, non-inferiority, randomised comparison of a new fibrinogen concentrate versus cryoprecipitate for treating acquired hypofibrinogenaemia in bleeding cardiac surgical patients: the FIBRES trial.

Authors:  Keyvan Karkouti; Jeannie Callum; Vivek Rao; Nancy Heddle; Michael E Farkouh; Mark A Crowther; Damon C Scales
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.