Amy M Goss1, Barbara A Gower. 1. Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. amymiski@uab.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Evidence suggests intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) may be linked to insulin resistance, whereas thigh subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) may be related favorably with indices of metabolic health. However, whether adipose tissue depots of the thigh are differentially related to insulin sensitivity independent of total adiposity and other adipose tissue depots has not been determined. The objective of this study was to identify independent associations of the subcompartments of adipose tissue of the thigh with insulin sensitivity among 97 healthy early postmenopausal women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) scans of the mid-thigh were used to assess Thigh-SAT, Thigh perimuscular adipose tissue (PMAT), and Thigh-IMAT. CT scans at the L4-L5 intervertebral space were used to assess intra-abdominal adipose tissue (IAAT) and Abdominal-SAT. Total body fat was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The insulin sensitivity index (S(I)) was assessed by using a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test with minimal model analysis. RESULTS: Results indicated S(I) was positively associated with Thigh-SAT independent of total fat mass and other adipose tissue compartments. Among all women combined, S(I) was inversely associated with Thigh-IMAT independent of total fat mass. However, the relationship between S(I) and Thigh-IMAT was independent of IAAT only among women with high levels of Thigh-IMAT and IAAT. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate independent, opposing relationships of Thigh-SAT and Thigh-IMAT with insulin sensitivity in healthy postmenopausal women. Further research is needed to determine if these associations are causal in nature.
OBJECTIVE: Evidence suggests intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) may be linked to insulin resistance, whereas thigh subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) may be related favorably with indices of metabolic health. However, whether adipose tissue depots of the thigh are differentially related to insulin sensitivity independent of total adiposity and other adipose tissue depots has not been determined. The objective of this study was to identify independent associations of the subcompartments of adipose tissue of the thigh with insulin sensitivity among 97 healthy early postmenopausal women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) scans of the mid-thigh were used to assess Thigh-SAT, Thigh perimuscular adipose tissue (PMAT), and Thigh-IMAT. CT scans at the L4-L5 intervertebral space were used to assess intra-abdominal adipose tissue (IAAT) and Abdominal-SAT. Total body fat was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The insulin sensitivity index (S(I)) was assessed by using a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test with minimal model analysis. RESULTS: Results indicated S(I) was positively associated with Thigh-SAT independent of total fat mass and other adipose tissue compartments. Among all women combined, S(I) was inversely associated with Thigh-IMAT independent of total fat mass. However, the relationship between S(I) and Thigh-IMAT was independent of IAAT only among women with high levels of Thigh-IMAT and IAAT. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate independent, opposing relationships of Thigh-SAT and Thigh-IMAT with insulin sensitivity in healthy postmenopausal women. Further research is needed to determine if these associations are causal in nature.
Authors: Jeanine B Albu; Sonjia Kenya; Qing He; Marsha Wainwright; Evan S Berk; Stanley Heshka; Donald P Kotler; Ellen S Engelson Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Siobhán E McQuaid; Leanne Hodson; Matthew J Neville; A Louise Dennis; Jane Cheeseman; Sandy M Humphreys; Toralph Ruge; Marjorie Gilbert; Barbara A Fielding; Keith N Frayn; Fredrik Karpe Journal: Diabetes Date: 2010-10-13 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Jeannie Tay; Amy M Goss; W Timothy Garvey; Mark E Lockhart; Nikki C Bush; Michael J Quon; Gordon Fisher; Barbara A Gower Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Amy M Goss; Paula C Chandler-Laney; Fernando Ovalle; Laura Lee Goree; Ricardo Azziz; Renee A Desmond; G Wright Bates; Barbara A Gower Journal: Metabolism Date: 2014-07-18 Impact factor: 8.694
Authors: Debra L Waters; Lina Aguirre; Burke Gurney; David R Sinacore; Kenneth Fowler; Giulia Gregori; Reina Armamento-Villareal; Clifford Qualls; Dennis T Villareal Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2022-01-07 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: N Arrighi; C Moratal; N Clément; S Giorgetti-Peraldi; P Peraldi; A Loubat; J-Y Kurzenne; C Dani; A Chopard; C A Dechesne Journal: Cell Death Dis Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 8.469
Authors: I M Khan; X Yd Perrard; G Brunner; H Lui; L M Sparks; S R Smith; X Wang; Z-Z Shi; D E Lewis; H Wu; C M Ballantyne Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2015-06-04 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Moriah P Bellissimo; Emory Hsu; Li Hao; Kirk Easley; Greg S Martin; Thomas R Ziegler; Jessica A Alvarez Journal: J Clin Transl Endocrinol Date: 2021-06-06