BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional studies suggest that prevalence of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) increases from premenopause to postmenopause in women, independent of age. Little is known about why. We hypothesized that the incidence of the MetS increases with progression through menopause and that this increase is explained by the progressive androgenicity of the hormonal milieu. METHODS: This longitudinal, 9-year study of 949 participants in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation investigates the natural history of the menopausal transition. Participants of 5 ethnicities at 7 geographic sites were recruited when they were premenopausal or early perimenopausal and were eligible for this study if they (1) reached menopause during the study; (2) had never taken hormone therapy, and (3) did not have diabetes mellitus or the MetS at baseline. The primary outcome was the presence of MetS using National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. Secondary outcomes were the components of the MetS. RESULTS: By the final menstrual period, 13.7% of the women had new-onset MetS. Longitudinal analyses, centered at the final menstrual period, were adjusted for age at menopause, ethnicity, study site, marital status, education, body mass index, smoking, and aging. Odds of developing the MetS per year in perimenopause were 1.45 (95% confidence interval, 1.35-1.56); after menopause, 1.24 (95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.30). These odds were significantly different (P < .001). An increase in bioavailable testosterone or a decrease in sex hormone-binding globulin levels increased the odds. CONCLUSIONS: As testosterone progressively dominates the hormonal milieu during the menopausal transition, the prevalence of MetS increases, independent of aging and other important covariates. This may be a pathway by which cardiovascular disease increases during menopause.
BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional studies suggest that prevalence of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) increases from premenopause to postmenopause in women, independent of age. Little is known about why. We hypothesized that the incidence of the MetS increases with progression through menopause and that this increase is explained by the progressive androgenicity of the hormonal milieu. METHODS: This longitudinal, 9-year study of 949 participants in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation investigates the natural history of the menopausal transition. Participants of 5 ethnicities at 7 geographic sites were recruited when they were premenopausal or early perimenopausal and were eligible for this study if they (1) reached menopause during the study; (2) had never taken hormone therapy, and (3) did not have diabetes mellitus or the MetS at baseline. The primary outcome was the presence of MetS using National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. Secondary outcomes were the components of the MetS. RESULTS: By the final menstrual period, 13.7% of the women had new-onset MetS. Longitudinal analyses, centered at the final menstrual period, were adjusted for age at menopause, ethnicity, study site, marital status, education, body mass index, smoking, and aging. Odds of developing the MetS per year in perimenopause were 1.45 (95% confidence interval, 1.35-1.56); after menopause, 1.24 (95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.30). These odds were significantly different (P < .001). An increase in bioavailable testosterone or a decrease in sex hormone-binding globulin levels increased the odds. CONCLUSIONS: As testosterone progressively dominates the hormonal milieu during the menopausal transition, the prevalence of MetS increases, independent of aging and other important covariates. This may be a pathway by which cardiovascular disease increases during menopause.
Authors: D de Aloysio; M Gambacciani; M Meschia; F Pansini; A Bacchi Modena; P F Bolis; M Massobrio; G Maiocchi; E Peruzzi Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 1999-11-01 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Susan E Appt; Haiying Chen; Amanda K Goode; Patricia B Hoyer; Thomas B Clarkson; Michael R Adams; Mark E Wilson; Adrian A Franke; Jay R Kaplan Journal: Menopause Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: B Delia Johnson; Kathleen M Dwyer; Frank Z Stanczyk; Vera Bittner; Sarah L Berga; Glenn D Braunstein; Ricardo Azziz; YuChing Yang; Georgina E Hale; C Noel Bairey Merz Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2010-06-16 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Rachel P Wildman; Ping G Tepper; Sybil Crawford; Joel S Finkelstein; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell; Rebecca C Thurston; Nanette Santoro; Barbara Sternfeld; Gail A Greendale Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2012-06-21 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Jennifer B Frye; Ashley L Lukefahr; Laura E Wright; Sam L Marion; Patricia B Hoyer; Janet L Funk Journal: Comp Med Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 0.982
Authors: Eliana A P Nahas; Jorge Nahas-Neto; Claudio L Orsatti; Ana Paula Tardivo; Gilberto Uemura; Maria Terezinha S Peraçoli; Steven S Witkin Journal: Cell Stress Chaperones Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 3.667