| Literature DB >> 34178605 |
Moriah P Bellissimo1, Emory Hsu2,3, Li Hao4, Kirk Easley5, Greg S Martin6, Thomas R Ziegler4,7,8, Jessica A Alvarez4,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of adults have normal weight obesity (NWO), defined as a normal body mass index (BMI) but disproportionately high body fat percentage. Individuals with NWO may have increased risk of cardiometabolic disorders and lower exercise tolerance, but it is unclear if this obesity phenotype is linked with dysregulated production of adipokines or myokines such as adiponectin and apelin, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: Adipose; Cytokines; Fat distribution; Fitness; Metabolic; Obesity phenotype
Year: 2021 PMID: 34178605 PMCID: PMC8213890 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcte.2021.100257
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Transl Endocrinol ISSN: 2214-6237
Demographic, clinical, and body composition characteristics.
| Variable | Lean | Normal Weight Obesity | Overweight-Obesity | All participants |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 47.2 ± 11.4 | 47.8 ± 9.3 | 50.9 ± 9.6 | 49.6 ± 9.9 |
| Female n (%) | 15 (58) | 35 (83)* | 66 (59.5)* | 116 (66) |
| Post-menopausal n (%) | 2 (8)* | 14 (33)* | 25 (23) | 41 (23) |
| Caucasian n (%) | 23 (88) | 35 (83) | 77 (71) | 135 (76) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.1 ± 0.8a | 23.0 ± 0.7a | 30.5 ± 0.4b | 27.3 ± 5.5 |
| Fat mass (%) | 22.5 ± 0.9a | 30.4 ± 0.8b | 37.3 ± 0.5c | 35.1 ± 8.3 |
| Fat mass (kg) | 15.2 ± 1.7a | 19.3 ± 1.4a | 33.1 ± 0.8b | 27.9 ± 11.1 |
| Fat mass index | 5.2 ± 0.6a | 6.8 ± 0.5b | 11.6 ± 0.3c | 9.8 ± 4.0 |
| Lean mass (kg) | 50.4 ± 1.4a | 44.0 ± 1.2b | 52.1 ± 0.7a | 47.3 ± 10.5 |
| Lean mass index (kg/m2) | 17.0 ± 0.3a | 15.3 ± 0.3b | 17.9 ± 0.2c | 16.5 ± 2.4 |
| Leg fat mass (kg) | 5.7 (5.2, 6.3)a | 6.7 (6.2, 7.3)b | 9.9 (9.5, 10.4)c | 8.9 (8.5, 9.4) |
| Trunk to leg fat ratio | 1.2 ± 0.08a | 1.5 ± 0.07b | 1.8 ± 0.04c | 1.5 ± 0.57 |
| Visceral fat mass (kg) | 0.18 (0.13, 0.25)a | 0.44 (0.34, 0.57)b | 1.18 (1.01, 1.37)c | 0.62 (0.52, 0.73) |
| VO2 maximum (mL/min/kg)+ | 44.0 ± 2.0a | 36.1 ± 1.7b | 35.3 ± 1.0b | 36.9 ± 10.7 |
Demographic characteristics are presented as mean ± SD or count (percent).
For body composition and clinical variables by body composition subtype, data are presented as adjusted mean ± SE or, for variables that were log-transformed, geometric mean (95% confidence interval). Estimates are adjusted for age, sex, and race. Variables within rows that are connected by the same letter are statistically similar (P > 0.05) while those with different letters are significantly different via Tukey’s comparisons at P < 0.05.
* Groups within rows are significantly different at P < 0.017 following χ2 post-hoc results using a Bonferroni correction.
+ N = 167; n = 25 lean, n = 40 NWO, n = 102 overweight-obesity.
Abbreviations: NWO, normal weight obesity; BMI, body mass index; VO2, volume of oxygen consumption.
Fig. 1Levels of plasma adiponectin between lean, normal weight obesity, and overweight-obesity groups. Geometric mean and 95% confidence interval are shown for each group. Groups connected with the same letters are statistically similar (P > 0.05), while groups with different letters are significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Tukey post-hoc comparisons.
Cross-sectional associations between body composition measures (independent variable) and adipokine concentrations (dependent variable) [β ± SE (p-value)].a
| Body Composition Measure | Plasma adiponectin | Plasma apelin |
|---|---|---|
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | −0.007 ± 0.01 | |
| Fat mass (%) | −0.01 ± 0.01 | |
| Fat mass (kg) | −0.003 ± 0.006 | |
| Fat mass index | −0.01 ± 0.02 | |
| Lean mass (kg) | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.003 ± 0.01 |
| Lean mass index (kg/m2) | −0.0009 ± 0.04 | 0.01 ± 0.05 |
| Leg fat mass (kg) | −0.07 ± 0.37 | |
| Trunk to leg fat ratio | −0.11 ± 0.15 | |
| Visceral fat mass (kg) | −0.02 ± 0.11 |
R2 values for adiponectin analyses ranged from 0.33 to 0.41 with leg fat mass having the highest R2.
R2 values for apelin analyses ranged from 0.08 to 0.09, indicating low goodness of fit across all analyses.
All coefficient estimates are from multiple linear regression analyses with body composition measures as a continuous variable. Analyses were conducted individually for each measure of body composition. All estimates for adiponectin analyses are adjusted for age, race, and sex. Estimates for lean mass and lean mass index are adjusted for age, race, sex, and fat mass. Estimates for variables of fat distribution (leg fat mass, trunk to leg fat ratio, and visceral fat mass) were adjusted for age, race, sex, and fat mass excluding the variable of interest. In addition, all estimates for apelin analyses are adjusted for VO2 maximum. Bolded values indicate significant findings.
Variable was natural log-transformed for analyses.
n = 167.
Fig. 2Levels of plasma apelin between lean, normal weight obesity, and overweight-obesity groups. Geometric mean and 95% confidence interval are shown for each group. Groups connected with the same letters are statistically similar (P > 0.05), while groups with different letters are significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Tukey post-hoc comparisons.
Fig. 3Relationship between VO2 maximum and log-transformed plasma apelin concentrations [−0.03 ± 0.01, p < 0.001, mean square error (MSE) = 0.699] adjusting for age, race, sex, and fat mass percent. A multiple linear regression model was fit to test the association between VO2 maximum and log-transformed plasma apelin.