Literature DB >> 22742058

Association of insurance status and age with cervical cancer stage at diagnosis: National Cancer Database, 2000-2007.

Stacey A Fedewa1, Vilma Cokkinides, Katherine S Virgo, Priti Bandi, Debbie Saslow, Elizabeth M Ward.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We examined the relationship of age at diagnosis and insurance status with stage among cervical cancer patients aged 21 to 85 years.
METHODS: We selected data on women (n = 69 739) diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer between 2000 and 2007 from the National Cancer Database. We evaluated the association between late stage (stage III/IV) and both insurance and age, with adjustment for race/ethnicity and other sociodemographic and clinical factors. We used multivariable log binomial models to estimate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS: The proportion of late-stage disease increased with age: from 16.53% (21-34 years) to 42.44% (≥ 70 years). The adjusted relative risk of advanced-stage disease among women aged 50 years and older was 2.2 to 2.5 times that of patients aged 21 to 34 years. Uninsured (RR = 1.44; 95% CI = 1.40, 1.49), Medicaid (RR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.34, 1.41), younger Medicare (RR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.06, 1.19), and older Medicare (RR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.15, 1.26) patients had a higher risk of late-stage disease than did privately insured patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Screening should be encouraged for women at high risk for advanced-stage disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22742058      PMCID: PMC3482026          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  45 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review.

Authors:  K Nanda; D C McCrory; E R Myers; L A Bastian; V Hasselblad; J D Hickey; D B Matchar
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-05-16       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys.

Authors:  N Breen; D K Wagener; M L Brown; W W Davis; R Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-11-21       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Carolyn D Runowicz; Diane Solomon; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Robert A Smith; Harmon J Eyre; Carmel Cohen
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Factors associated with age at natural menopause in a multiethnic sample of midlife women.

Authors:  E B Gold; J Bromberger; S Crawford; S Samuels; G A Greendale; S D Harlow; J Skurnick
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Access to care: how much difference does Medicaid make?

Authors:  M L Berk; C L Schur
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Clinical and demographic predictors of late-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  J M Ferrante; E C Gonzalez; R G Roetzheim; N Pal; L Woodard
Journal:  Arch Fam Med       Date:  2000-05

7.  The importance of health insurance as a determinant of cancer screening: evidence from the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  J Hsia; E Kemper; C Kiefe; J Zapka; S Sofaer; M Pettinger; D Bowen; M Limacher; L Lillington; E Mason
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 8.  2001 Consensus Guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities.

Authors:  Thomas C Wright; J Thomas Cox; L Stewart Massad; Leo B Twiggs; Edward J Wilkinson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-04-24       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The association between health care coverage and the use of cancer screening tests. Results from the 1992 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  A L Potosky; N Breen; B I Graubard; P E Parsons
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Late stage cancers in a Medicaid-insured population.

Authors:  Cathy J Bradley; Charles W Given; Caralee Roberts
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  17 in total

1.  Enhancing Adherence to Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines at a Student-Run Free Clinic.

Authors:  Corley Rachelle Price; Leigh Ann Hatch; Anna Radisic; Sri Harsha Palakurty; Sabrina Khalil; Elizabeth Simoneit; Anaisy Pargas; Ishana Shetty; Michelle Lyman; Patrick Couchot; Richard Roetzheim; Lucy Guerra; Eduardo Gonzalez
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2020-02

2.  Disparities in the management and outcome of cervical cancer in the United States according to health insurance status.

Authors:  Thomas Churilla; Brian Egleston; Yanqun Dong; Talha Shaikh; Colin Murphy; Gina Mantia-Smaldone; Christina Chu; Stephen Rubin; Penny Anderson
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Primary care provider practices and beliefs related to cervical cancer screening with the HPV test in Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Authors:  K B Roland; V B Benard; A Greek; N A Hawkins; D Manninen; M Saraiya
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Primary care providers human papillomavirus vaccine recommendations for the medically underserved: a pilot study in U.S. Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Authors:  Katherine B Roland; Vicki B Benard; April Greek; Nikki A Hawkins; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  The role of spatially-derived access-to-care characteristics in melanoma prevention and control in Los Angeles county.

Authors:  Loraine A Escobedo; Ashley Crew; Ariana Eginli; David Peng; Michael R Cousineau; Myles Cockburn
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 4.078

6.  To what extent do age, stage and treatment influence survival after invasive cervical cancer: a French population-based study.

Authors:  Zoéwendtalé Cyrille Compaoré; Elisabeth Monnet; Aurélie Gérazime; Florence Molinié; Anne-Valérie Guizard; Patricia Delafosse; Tienhan Sandrine Dabakuyo-Yonli; Gaëlle Coureau; Karima Hammas; Sandrine Plouvier; Simona Bara; Gautier Défossez; Bénédicte Lapôtre-Ledoux; Laetitia Daubisse-Marliac; Tania d'Almeida; Guy Launoy; Laura Mansi; Brigitte Trétarre; Anne-Sophie Woronoff
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Disparities in stage at diagnosis, treatment, and survival in nonelderly adult patients with cancer according to insurance status.

Authors:  Gary V Walker; Stephen R Grant; B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Karen E Hoffman; Benjamin D Smith; Matthew Koshy; Pamela K Allen; Usama Mahmood
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Cervical cancer outcome by type of health care facilities: National Cancer Database, 2004-2015.

Authors:  HyounKyoung G Park; Zhixin E Wang; Chenguang Wang; Warner K Huh; Sejong Bae
Journal:  Cancer Health Disparities       Date:  2019-04-23

9.  Provider beliefs associated with cervical cancer screening interval recommendations: A pilot study in Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Authors:  Katherine B Roland; April Greek; Nikki A Hawkins; Lavinia Lin; Vicki B Benard
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2015

10.  The association between insurance status and cervical cancer screening in community health centers: exploring the potential of electronic health records for population-level surveillance, 2008-2010.

Authors:  Stuart Cowburn; Matthew J Carlson; Jodi A Lapidus; Jennifer E DeVoe
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.