Literature DB >> 31420789

Enhancing Adherence to Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines at a Student-Run Free Clinic.

Corley Rachelle Price1, Leigh Ann Hatch2,3, Anna Radisic1, Sri Harsha Palakurty1, Sabrina Khalil1, Elizabeth Simoneit1, Anaisy Pargas1, Ishana Shetty1, Michelle Lyman1, Patrick Couchot1, Richard Roetzheim4, Lucy Guerra4, Eduardo Gonzalez4.   

Abstract

Women who lack health insurance have much lower rates of cervical cancer screening and higher rates of cervical cancer than insured women. The current screening rate for insured patients is 86.9%, while the rate for uninsured women is 68.2%. Student-run free clinics may help increase the rates of cervical cancer screening in uninsured women. As screening rates in this setting are uncertain, this study was performed to determine rates of cervical cancer screening at a student-run free clinic, and therefore determine its effectiveness in increasing screening rates in uninsured women. A retrospective chart review was conducted among female patients ages 21-64 at a student-run free clinic to determine how many patients were up-to-date with cervical cancer screening per American Cancer Society (ACS) guidelines. A total of 239 women were included in the retrospective chart review. At their most recent visit, 87.9% of clinic patients were up-to-date on cervical cancer screening. This screening rate is higher than both the reported uninsured (68.2%) and insured (86.9%) national screening rates in the United States. Although there are multiple barriers that prevent uninsured patients from undergoing cervical cancer screenings, screening rates at our student-run free clinic are higher than national screening rates. This higher screening rate can be attributed to a standardized screening system, access to resources including Pap tests provided by community partners, and the clinic's ability to longitudinally follow patients. However, there remain areas for improvement, such as reducing no-show rates and ensuring that staff screen for cervical cancer at each visit.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer screening; Pap smear; Student-run free clinic; Uninsured

Year:  2020        PMID: 31420789     DOI: 10.1007/s10900-019-00724-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  5 in total

Review 1.  Factors underlying disparities in cervical cancer incidence, screening, and treatment in the United States.

Authors:  Aletha Y Akers; Sara J Newmann; Jennifer S Smith
Journal:  Curr Probl Cancer       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.187

2.  National assessment of HPV and Pap tests: Changes in cervical cancer screening, National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Meg Watson; Vicki Benard; Jessica King; Anatasha Crawford; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Association of insurance status and age with cervical cancer stage at diagnosis: National Cancer Database, 2000-2007.

Authors:  Stacey A Fedewa; Vilma Cokkinides; Katherine S Virgo; Priti Bandi; Debbie Saslow; Elizabeth M Ward
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Cervical Cancer Screening Barriers and Risk Factor Knowledge Among Uninsured Women.

Authors:  Marvellous Akinlotan; Jane N Bolin; Janet Helduser; Chinedum Ojinnaka; Anna Lichorad; David McClellan
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-08

5.  Cancer survival disparities by health insurance status.

Authors:  Xiaoling Niu; Lisa M Roche; Karen S Pawlish; Kevin A Henry
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 4.452

  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  A Three-Year Analysis of the Impact of a Student-Run Gynecology Clinic on Access to Reproductive Health Care for Uninsured Women in East Harlem.

Authors:  Eileen Wang; Chloe Getrajdman; Gabriela Frid; Japjot Bal; Cynthia Abraham; Adam Jacobs; Yasmin Meah; Farida Nentin
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2021-05-13

2.  Preventative Cancer Screening Rates Among Uninsured Patients in Free Clinics: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Cancer Survivors and Non-cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Madeline MacDonald; Abu-Sayeef Mirza; Rahul Mhaskar; Aldenise Ewing; Liwei Chen; Katherine Robinson; Yuanyuan Lu; Noura Ayoubi; Eduardo Gonzalez; Lucy Guerra; Richard Roetzheim; Laurie Woodard; Smitha Pabbathi
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

Review 3.  Patient Outcomes from Student-Run Health Services: An Integrative Review.

Authors:  Patrick Broman; Ema Tokolahi; Oliver W A Wilson; Marrin Haggie; Patrea Andersen; Sharon Brownie
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2022-03-30

4.  Comparison of quality metrics in an education-centered medical home with local and national benchmarks.

Authors:  Ana Sofia Mesa; Marianne Tschoe
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2022-12

Review 5.  Understanding Student-Run Health Initiatives in the Context of Community-Based Services: A Concept Analysis and Proposed Definitions.

Authors:  Daniel A Nagel; Taylor T Naccarato; Mark T Philip; Victoria K Ploszay; Janice Winkler; Diana C Sanchez-Ramirez; Jamie L Penner
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.