Literature DB >> 34027312

Cervical cancer outcome by type of health care facilities: National Cancer Database, 2004-2015.

HyounKyoung G Park1,2, Zhixin E Wang1,2, Chenguang Wang3, Warner K Huh4,2, Sejong Bae1,2.   

Abstract

The National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2015 was analyzed to identify cervical cancer outcomes associated with demographic and clinical characteristics measured by types of facility. Chi-Square tests were used to compare proportions and logistic regression to determine factors associated with cervical cancer outcomes. Women treated at Academic/Research Programs (ARPs) were younger at diagnosis, more likely black, less educated and more in Stage 2, lived further away from treatment facilities, had less comorbidities and better 5-year survival, and were more likely to be alive at 30 and 90 days after surgery compared to other programs. Women treated at Community Cancer Programs were more likely 75 and older at diagnosis, more likely to receive radiation treatment and more in Stage 4, more living in rural areas and less than 10 miles from the facility, and had more comorbidities, and lower 5-year survival compared to other programs. Women treated at Comprehensive Community Cancer Programs were more likely white and educated, had more private insurance, and underwent surgery. Women treated at Integrated Network Cancer Programs were more likely to live in urban, south region, and in Stage 1B2, had more surgery and one comorbidity, and died fewer than 30 days after surgery. The type of facility and treatment had varied effects on mortality and 5-year survival. Considering the different cervical cancer outcomes from different health care facilities, further research is needed to identify what factors influence women to choose a health care facility for their treatment and how this choice can affect different health outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; mortality; survival; type of facility

Year:  2019        PMID: 34027312      PMCID: PMC8136613     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Health Disparities        ISSN: 2573-9530


  28 in total

1.  Disparities in cervical cancer in African American women: What primary care physicians can do.

Authors:  Cynthia Arvizo; Haider Mahdi
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.321

2.  The effect of race and rural residence on prostate cancer treatment choice among men in Georgia.

Authors:  Kyle Steenland; Michael Goodman; Jonathan Liff; Colleen Diiorio; Susan Butler; Phil Roberts; Judith L Smith; Donatus Ekwueme; Ingrid J Hall
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Factors associated with decisions to undergo surgery among patients with newly diagnosed early-stage lung cancer.

Authors:  Samuel Cykert; Peggye Dilworth-Anderson; Michael H Monroe; Paul Walker; Franklin R McGuire; Giselle Corbie-Smith; Lloyd J Edwards; Audrina Jones Bunton
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Hysterectomy-corrected cervical cancer mortality rates reveal a larger racial disparity in the United States.

Authors:  Anna L Beavis; Patti E Gravitt; Anne F Rositch
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  The impact of health insurance status on the stage of cervical cancer diagnosis at a tertiary care center in Massachusetts.

Authors:  Michelle Davis; Kyle Strickland; Sarah Rae Easter; Michael Worley; Colleen Feltmate; Michael Muto; Neil Horowitz; Ross Berkowitz; Sarah Feldman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Evaluating the urban-rural paradox: The complicated relationship between distance and the receipt of guideline-concordant care among cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  Lisa P Spees; Stephanie B Wheeler; Mahesh Varia; Morris Weinberger; Christopher D Baggett; Xi Zhou; Victoria M Petermann; Wendy R Brewster
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Impact of cervical screening on cervical cancer mortality: estimation using stage-specific results from a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Rebecca Landy; Francesca Pesola; Alejandra Castañón; Peter Sasieni
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Recent trends in racial and regional disparities in cervical cancer incidence and mortality in United States.

Authors:  Wonsuk Yoo; Sangmi Kim; Warner K Huh; Sarah Dilley; Steven S Coughlin; Edward E Partridge; Yunmi Chung; Vivian Dicks; Jae-Kwan Lee; Sejong Bae
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Differences in the risk of cervical cancer and human papillomavirus infection by education level.

Authors:  S Franceschi; M Plummer; G Clifford; S de Sanjose; X Bosch; R Herrero; N Muñoz; S Vaccarella
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Cervical cancer in women over 65: An analysis of screening.

Authors:  S Yost; A Hoekstra
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-05-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.