Literature DB >> 22740496

The impact of pronuclei morphology and dynamicity on live birth outcome after time-lapse culture.

A Azzarello1, T Hoest, A L Mikkelsen.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Can the pronuclei (PN) morphology and the time of PN breakdown (PNB) predict the potential of embryos to result in live birth? SUMMARY ANSWER: In comparison to embryos resulting in no live birth, PNB occurred significantly later in embryos resulting in live birth and never earlier than 20 h 45 min. None of the tested scoring systems were shown to predict the live birth outcome in a time-lapse set-up. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The PN morphology is supported as a prominent embryo selection parameter in single light microscopy observations, although controversial results have been reported. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a prospective study of 159 embryos, all of which were later transferred. The PN morphology of 46 embryos which resulted in live birth was compared with that of 113 embryos which resulted in no live birth. PARTICIPANTS,
SETTING: From 1 March 2010 to 30 August 2011, 130 couples underwent fertility treatment by ICSI. Embryo culture was performed in a time-lapse set-up from fertilization to intrauterine transfer. PN morphological assessment was performed on every embryo replaced, using six different scoring systems at different times. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: No embryo with PNB earlier than 20 h 45 min resulted in live birth. All six PN assessment models showed no significant distribution of scores (P = NS) between the live birth and no live birth groups at 16 h post-fertilization (PF), 18 h PF and 40 min before PNB. The outcomes of assessments changed significantly (P < 0.001) over time and the time of PNB was found to be the optimal stage to evaluate the PN morphology. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The study includes only embryos reaching the 4-cell stage after ICSI, and transferred at 44 h PF. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: The PN morphology changes over time, indicating that the single light microscopy observation approach is deficient in comparison to time-lapse. Although the assessment of the PN morphology does not improve embryo selection, the timing of PNB should be included in embryo selection parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22740496     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  38 in total

1.  Morphokinetic parameters using time-lapse technology and day 5 embryo quality: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ashleigh Storr; Christos A Venetis; Simon Cooke; Daisy Susetio; Suha Kilani; William Ledger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Selecting embryos with the highest implantation potential using data mining and decision tree based on classical embryo morphology and morphokinetics.

Authors:  Beatriz Carrasco; Gemma Arroyo; Yolanda Gil; Mª José Gómez; Ignacio Rodríguez; Pedro N Barri; Anna Veiga; Montserrat Boada
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Live birth rate and number of blastomeres on day 2 transfer.

Authors:  Antonino Azzarello; Thomas Hoest; Anders Hay-Schmidt; Anne Lis Mikkelsen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Unaltered timing of embryo development in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS): a time-lapse study.

Authors:  Linda Sundvall; Kirstine Kirkegaard; Hans Jakob Ingerslev; Ulla Breth Knudsen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Morphokinetic parameters of early embryo development via time lapse monitoring and their effect on embryo selection and ICSI outcomes: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Charalampos Siristatidis; Maria Aggeliki Komitopoulou; Andreas Makris; Afrodite Sialakouma; Mitrodora Botzaki; George Mastorakos; George Salamalekis; Stefano Bettocchi; Giles Anthony Palmer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Biomarkers identified with time-lapse imaging: discovery, validation, and practical application.

Authors:  Alice A Chen; Lei Tan; Vaishali Suraj; Renee Reijo Pera; Shehua Shen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 7.  Chromosomal instability in mammalian pre-implantation embryos: potential causes, detection methods, and clinical consequences.

Authors:  Brittany L Daughtry; Shawn L Chavez
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 5.249

8.  The combination of pronuclear and blastocyst morphology: a strong prognostic tool for implantation potential.

Authors:  Daniela Paes Almeida Ferreira Braga; Amanda S Setti; Rita de Cássia S Figueira; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-08-11       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Assessing equine embryo developmental competency by time-lapse image analysis.

Authors:  Kelsey E Brooks; Brittany L Daughtry; Elizabeth Metcalf; Keith Masterson; David Battaglia; Lina Gao; Byung Park; Shawn L Chavez
Journal:  Reprod Fertil Dev       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Assisted oocyte activation effects on the morphokinetic pattern of derived embryos.

Authors:  M Martínez; M Durban; J Santaló; A Rodríguez; R Vassena
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.