Literature DB >> 22740029

Compliance with Surgical Care Improvement Project measures and hospital-associated infections following hip arthroplasty.

Zhong Wang1, Foster Chen, Michael Ward, Timothy Bhattacharyya.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hospital compliance with the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) measures has increased recently for patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. However, reductions in postoperative infections were less than expected, and concern remains about complications associated with prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism (VTE). We sought to examine the association between hospital adherence to SCIP measures and postoperative infections.
METHODS: We conducted an observational study of 17,714 patients who underwent hip replacement in 2008 at 128 New York state hospitals. These hospitals were divided into less compliant and highly compliant groups, on the basis of their levels of compliance compared with the median value of compliance with SCIP measures. From the New York State Department of Health annual report, we collected the confirmed postoperative infections at the facility level. From the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project state inpatient database, we identified incidences of postoperative infections at the patient level, using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes.
RESULTS: During 2008, mean hospital compliance increased from 93.5% to 96.0% for the infection prevention measure and from 91.4% to 97.5% for the VTE prevention measure. Higher adherence to infection prevention measures was not associated with a significant reduction in infection (p ≥ 0.09 for all). Hospitals that were at least 97% compliant with the SCIP VTE-2 measure (patients receiving VTE prophylaxis around the time of surgery) reported significantly higher infection rates compared with less compliant hospitals (1.60% versus 0.93%; p < 0.001). Similarly, patients from highly compliant hospitals (for the VTE-2 measure) were at significant risk of postoperative infection (adjusted odds ratio, 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 2.12; p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Targeting complete compliance with SCIP infection prevention measures was not associated with additional reductions in infection outcomes following hip replacement. Furthermore, significant risk of postoperative infections may result from increased perioperative use of VTE prophylactics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22740029      PMCID: PMC3401140          DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  22 in total

1.  Association of surgical care improvement project infection-related process measure compliance with risk-adjusted outcomes: implications for quality measurement.

Authors:  Angela M Ingraham; Mark E Cohen; Karl Y Bilimoria; Justin B Dimick; Karen E Richards; Mehul V Raval; Lee A Fleisher; Bruce L Hall; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030.

Authors:  Steven Kurtz; Kevin Ong; Edmund Lau; Fionna Mowat; Michael Halpern
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Factors associated with prolonged wound drainage after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Vipul P Patel; Michael Walsh; Bantoo Sehgal; Charles Preston; Hargovind DeWal; Paul E Di Cesare
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Preoperative low molecular weight heparin as venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients at risk for prosthetic infection after knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Angel Asensio; Antonio Ramos; Elena Múñez; José L Vilanova; Pedro Torrijos; Fernando J García
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.254

5.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.

Authors:  A Elixhauser; C Steiner; D R Harris; R M Coffey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  The surgical infection prevention and surgical care improvement projects: national initiatives to improve outcomes for patients having surgery.

Authors:  Dale W Bratzler; David R Hunt
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  A meta-analysis of thromboembolic prophylaxis following elective total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  K B Freedman; K R Brookenthal; R H Fitzgerald; S Williams; J H Lonner
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Failure of the American College of Chest Physicians-1A protocol for lovenox in clinical outcomes for thromboembolic prophylaxis.

Authors:  R Stephen J Burnett; John C Clohisy; Rick W Wright; Douglas J McDonald; Robert A Shively; Stephanie A Givens; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 9.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy.

Authors:  William H Geerts; Graham F Pineo; John A Heit; David Bergqvist; Michael R Lassen; Clifford W Colwell; Joel G Ray
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Risk factors for surgical-site infection following primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brian Minnema; Mary Vearncombe; Anne Augustin; Jeffrey Gollish; Andrew E Simor
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.254

View more
  9 in total

1.  Postdischarge antibiotic use for prophylaxis following spinal fusion.

Authors:  David K Warren; Katelin B Nickel; Jennifer H Han; Pam Tolomeo; Christopher J Hostler; Katherine Foy; Ian R Banks; Victoria J Fraser; Margaret A Olsen
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.254

2.  Impact of Medicare's Nonpayment Program on Venous Thromboembolism Following Hip and Knee Replacements.

Authors:  Caroline P Thirukumaran; Laurent G Glance; Meredith B Rosenthal; Helena Temkin-Greener; Rishi Balkissoon; Addisu Mesfin; Yue Li
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Achieving moral, high quality, affordable medical care in America through a true free market.

Authors:  David McKalip
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2016-11

Review 4.  Identification and preoperative optimization of risk factors to prevent periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Seung-Hoon Baek
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-07-18

5.  Prevalence and Predictors of Postdischarge Antibiotic Use Following Mastectomy.

Authors:  Margaret A Olsen; Katelin B Nickel; Victoria J Fraser; Anna E Wallace; David K Warren
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.254

6.  Lack of association of post-discharge prophylactic antibiotics with decreased risk of surgical site infection following spinal fusion.

Authors:  Margaret A Olsen; Jacob K Greenberg; Kate Peacock; Katelin B Nickel; Victoria J Fraser; David K Warren
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.758

7.  Surgical site infections and other postoperative complications following prophylactic anticoagulation in total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Zhong Wang; Frederick A Anderson; Michael Ward; Timothy Bhattacharyya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Non-compliance with clinical guidelines increases the risk of complications after primary total hip and knee joint replacement surgery.

Authors:  Helen Mary Badge; Tim Churches; Justine M Naylor; Wei Xuan; Elizabeth Armstrong; Leeanne Gray; John Fletcher; Iain Gosbell; Christine Lin; Ian A Harris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evidence-base for aspirin as venous thromboembolic prophylaxis following joint replacement.

Authors:  S S Jameson; P N Baker; D J Deehan; A Port; M R Reed
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.853

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.