Literature DB >> 28392591

Achieving moral, high quality, affordable medical care in America through a true free market.

David McKalip1.   

Abstract

The basis of a just and moral economic model for health care is examined in the context of Catholic social teaching. The performance of the current model of "central economic planning" in medicine is evaluated in terms of the core principles of the social doctrine of the Catholic Church and compared to freedom-based economic models. It is clear that the best way to respect and serve human dignity, the common good, subsidiarity, and solidarity in medicine is through the establishment of a true, free-market health economy. Lay Summary : This article reviews the impact of recent healthcare reforms as well as traditional "third party payment" models for healthcare financing in America (insurance). Impact on patients and doctors are evaluated in the context of Catholic social doctrine and the Catechism. The many shortcomings and negative consequences of an economy planned centrally by government are compared to the benefits of a true free-market medical economy with empowered individuals. The analysis shows that interference in the patient-physician relationship and the centrally planned medical economy itself violates Catholic teachings, harms patients and doctors, and create morally evil outcomes and economic structures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Catholic social doctrine; Central economic planning; Free market; Health care; Pay for performance

Year:  2016        PMID: 28392591      PMCID: PMC5375601          DOI: 10.1080/00243639.2016.1253277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Linacre Q        ISSN: 0024-3639


  11 in total

1.  Surgical care improvement: should performance measures have performance measures.

Authors:  Mary T Hawn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions.

Authors:  Govind Persad; Alan Wertheimer; Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Association of hospital participation in a surgical outcomes monitoring program with inpatient complications and mortality.

Authors:  David A Etzioni; Nabil Wasif; Amylou C Dueck; Robert R Cima; Samuel F Hohmann; James M Naessens; Amit K Mathur; Elizabeth B Habermann
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Shaving.

Authors:  David McKalip
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  The long-term effect of premier pay for performance on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; Karen E Joynt; E John Orav; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians.

Authors:  Anthony Scott; Peter Sivey; Driss Ait Ouakrim; Lisa Willenberg; Lucio Naccarella; John Furler; Doris Young
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-09-07

7.  Medicare program: changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2009 rates; payments for graduate medical education in certain emergency situations; changes to disclosure of physician ownership in hospitals and physician self-referral rules; updates to the long-term care prospective payment system; updates to certain IPPS-excluded hospitals; and collection of information regarding financial relationships between hospitals. Final rules.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2008-08-19

8.  Does pay-for-performance improve surgical outcomes? An evaluation of phase 2 of the Premier Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration.

Authors:  Terry Shih; Lauren H Nicholas; Jyothi R Thumma; John D Birkmeyer; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Compliance with Surgical Care Improvement Project measures and hospital-associated infections following hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Zhong Wang; Foster Chen; Michael Ward; Timothy Bhattacharyya
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 10.  Do Health Care Delivery System Reforms Improve Value? The Jury Is Still Out.

Authors:  Deborah Korenstein; Kevin Duan; Manuel J Diaz; Rosa Ahn; Salomeh Keyhani
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  2 in total

1.  Caring for the Poor and Vulnerable: A Virtue Analysis of Mandated Health Insurance Compared with Healthcare Sharing Ministries.

Authors:  Ezra Sullivan
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2020-08-20

Review 2.  Multidisciplinary Firms and the Treatment of Chronic Pain: A Case Study of Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Julie G Pilitsis; Olga Khazen; Nikolai G Wenzel
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-11-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.