Literature DB >> 11716426

Morselized bone grafting of defects in revision total knee arthroplasty.

J Benjamin1, G Engh, B Parsley, T Donaldson, T Coon.   

Abstract

In a prospective, multicenter study evaluating one revision knee system, 33 of 409 patients underwent morselized bone grafting for tibial and femoral defects. Fifty-four percent of defects were bicondylar and the defect volumes averaged 36 cc3. There was no difference in preoperative or postoperative knee scores between patients undergoing morselized grafting and the entire group. Radiographic evaluation showed remodeling of the grafted areas consistent with viable incorporation of the graft. The incidence of radiolucent lines, at 2 years followup, was not different between the patients who received grafting and the patients who did not receive grafting. There have been no clinical failures or reoperations in the patients who received morselized bone grafting. Morselized bone grafting seems to offer a viable alternative in the reconstruction of osseous defects in patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11716426     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200111000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  9 in total

1.  Bone mineral density changes of the proximal tibia after revision total knee arthroplasty. A randomised study with the use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones.

Authors:  Claus L Jensen; Michael M Petersen; Henrik M Schrøder; Bjarne Lund
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Impaction bone grafting for the reconstruction of large bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M Rudert; B M Holzapfel; E von Rottkay; D E Holzapfel; U Noeth
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  Revision total knee arthroplasty for major osteolysis.

Authors:  R Stephen J Burnett; James A Keeney; William J Maloney; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2009

4.  No Difference Between Trabecular Metal Cones and Femoral Head Allografts in Revision TKA: Minimum 5-year Followup.

Authors:  Nemandra A Sandiford; Peter Misur; Donald S Garbuz; Nelson V Greidanus; Bassam A Masri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Can tantalum cones provide fixation in complex revision knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Michael P Bolognesi; Robert A Henderson; Elizabeth S Soileau; Thomas Parker Vail
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Changes in bone mineral density of the distal femur after revision total knee arthroplasty with metaphyseal press-fit stem.

Authors:  Claus L Jensen; Michael M Petersen; Henrik M Schrøder; Bjarne Lund
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-07-15

7.  Patient outcome following revision total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Puyi Sheng; Matti Lehto; Matti Kataja; Pekka Halonen; Teemu Moilanen; Jorma Pajamäki
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Tibial bone loss in revision TKA: Options for management without sleeves and cones -a schematic review.

Authors:  Sibin Surendran; P Gopinathan
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-17

9.  10-year results following impaction bone grafting of major bone defects in 29 rotational and hinged knee revision arthroplasties: a follow-up of a previous report.

Authors:  Verena Hilgen; Mustafa Citak; Eik Vettorazzi; Carl Haasper; Kimberly Day; Michael Amling; Thorsten Gehrke; Matthias Gebauer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.