Literature DB >> 28074250

Cortical porosity exhibits accelerated rate of change in peri- compared with post-menopausal women.

L A Burt1, J L Bhatla1, D A Hanley2, S K Boyd3.   

Abstract

The rate of change in bone density was not different between peri- and post-menopausal women. Differences in rate of change were observed in bone microarchitecture, specifically cortical porosity (Ct.Po), where peri-menopausal women increased +9% per year compared with the +6% per year for post-menopausal women.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare changes in bone density and microarchitecture in peri- and post-menopausal women over 6 years.
METHODS: Peri- (n = 26) and post- (n = 65) menopausal women were selected from the Canadian Multicenter Osteoporosis Study. Caucasian women were scanned on dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) at baseline and follow-up, an average 6 years later. To compare repeat scans, automated 3D image registration was conducted. At the radius and tibia, total volumetric BMD (Tt.BMD), total bone area (Tt.Ar) and cortical porosity (Ct.Po) were assessed, and finite element analysis estimated apparent bone strength.
RESULTS: At the tibia, the rate of change for Ct.Po and Tt.Ar was different between groups. Peri-menopausal women had a + 9% per year increase in Ct.Po, but this increase was slower for post-menopausal women at +6% per year (p = 0.049). In addition, post-menopausal women had an increase in Tt.Ar of +0.13% per year compared with a slower increase of +0.06% per year for peri-menopausal women (p = 0.017). The rate of change of density between groups was not significantly different and was approximately -1% per year at the hip by DXA, and -1% per year at the radius and -0.5% per year tibia by HR-pQCT.
CONCLUSION: This is a 6-year prospective HR-pQCT study exploring rate of change in Caucasian peri- and post-menopausal women. The microarchitectural features represented by Ct.Po and Tt.Ar changed at a significantly different rate between groups, but group differences were not detected by density measures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone microarchitecture; High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography; Menopausal; Menopausal transition; Rate of change

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28074250     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-016-3900-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  33 in total

1.  Characterization of perimenopausal bone loss: a prospective study.

Authors:  R Recker; J Lappe; K Davies; R Heaney
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  A prospective study of bone loss in menopausal Australian-born women.

Authors:  J R Guthrie; P R Ebeling; J L Hopper; E Barrett-Connor; L Dennerstein; E C Dudley; H G Burger; J D Wark
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Apparent pre- and postmenopausal bone loss evaluated by DXA at different skeletal sites in women: the OFELY cohort.

Authors:  M E Arlot; E Sornay-Rendu; P Garnero; B Vey-Marty; P D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Bone loss in premenopausal, perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: results of a prospective observational study over 9 years.

Authors:  V Seifert-Klauss; S Fillenberg; H Schneider; P Luppa; D Mueller; M Kiechle
Journal:  Climacteric       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.005

5.  Age-related patterns of trabecular and cortical bone loss differ between sexes and skeletal sites: a population-based HR-pQCT study.

Authors:  Heather M Macdonald; Kyle K Nishiyama; Jian Kang; David A Hanley; Steven K Boyd
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Degenerative changes at the lumbar spine--implications for bone mineral density measurement in elderly women.

Authors:  M Tenne; F McGuigan; J Besjakov; P Gerdhem; K Åkesson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Bone remodeling increases substantially in the years after menopause and remains increased in older osteoporosis patients.

Authors:  Robert Recker; Joan Lappe; K Michael Davies; Robert Heaney
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-07-21       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Bone mineral density changes during the menopause transition in a multiethnic cohort of women.

Authors:  Joel S Finkelstein; Sarah E Brockwell; Vinay Mehta; Gail A Greendale; MaryFran R Sowers; Bruce Ettinger; Joan C Lo; Janet M Johnston; Jane A Cauley; Michelle E Danielson; Robert M Neer
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Bone loss and bone size after menopause.

Authors:  Henrik G Ahlborg; Olof Johnell; Charles H Turner; Gunnar Rannevik; Magnus K Karlsson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  A population-based assessment of rates of bone loss at multiple skeletal sites: evidence for substantial trabecular bone loss in young adult women and men.

Authors:  B Lawrence Riggs; L Joseph Melton; Richard A Robb; Jon J Camp; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Lisa McDaniel; Shreyasee Amin; Peggy A Rouleau; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  1 in total

1.  Guidelines for the assessment of bone density and microarchitecture in vivo using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  D E Whittier; S K Boyd; A J Burghardt; J Paccou; A Ghasem-Zadeh; R Chapurlat; K Engelke; M L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.507

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.