| Literature DB >> 22731939 |
Lyndsay N Kubicek1, Songwon Seo, Richard J Chappell, Robert Jeraj, Lisa J Forrest.
Abstract
The purpose of our study was to compare setup variation in four degrees of freedom (vertical, longitudinal, lateral, and roll) between canine nasal tumor patients immobilized with a mattress and bite block, versus a mattress alone. Our secondary aim was to define a clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) expansion margin based on our mean systematic error values associated with nasal tumor patients immobilized by a mattress and bite block. We evaluated six parameters for setup corrections: systematic error, random error, patient-patient variation in systematic errors, the magnitude of patient-specific random errors (root mean square [RMS]), distance error, and the variation of setup corrections from zero shift. The variations in all parameters were statistically smaller in the group immobilized by a mattress and bite block. The mean setup corrections in the mattress and bite block group ranged from 0.91 mm to 1.59 mm for the translational errors and 0.5°. Although most veterinary radiation facilities do not have access to Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), we identified a need for more rigid fixation, established the value of adding IGRT to veterinary radiation therapy, and define the CTV-PTV setup error margin for canine nasal tumor patients immobilized in a mattress and bite block.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22731939 PMCID: PMC3690917 DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2012.01947.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Radiol Ultrasound ISSN: 1058-8183 Impact factor: 1.363