Literature DB >> 24685446

Spatiotemporal stability of Cu-ATSM and FLT positron emission tomography distributions during radiation therapy.

Tyler J Bradshaw1, Stephen Yip1, Ngoneh Jallow1, Lisa J Forrest2, Robert Jeraj3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In dose painting, in which functional imaging is used to define biological targets for radiation therapy dose escalation, changes in spatial distributions of biological properties during treatment can compromise the quality of therapy. The goal of this study was to assess the spatiotemporal stability of 2 potential dose painting targets--hypoxia and proliferation--in canine tumors during radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-two canine patients with sinonasal tumors (14 carcinoma and 8 sarcoma) were imaged before hypofractionated radiation therapy with copper(II)-diacetyl-bis(N4-methylthiosemicarbazone) (Cu-ATSM) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for hypoxia and 3'-deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymidine (FLT) PET/CT for proliferation. The FLT scans were repeated after 2 fractions and the Cu-ATSM scans after 3 fractions. Midtreatment PET/CT images were deformably registered to pretreatment PET/CT images. Voxel-based Spearman correlation coefficients quantified the spatial stability of Cu-ATSM and FLT uptake distributions between pretreatment and midtreatment scans. Paired t tests determined significant differences between the patients' respective Cu-ATSM and FLT correlations coefficients. Standardized uptake value measures were also compared between pretreatment and midtreatment scans by use of paired t tests.
RESULTS: Spatial distributions of Cu-ATSM and FLT uptake were stable through midtreatment for both sarcomas and carcinomas: the population mean ± standard deviation in Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.88 ± 0.07 for Cu-ATSM and 0.79 ± 0.13 for FLT. The patients' Cu-ATSM correlation coefficients were significantly higher than their respective FLT correlation coefficients (P=.001). Changes in Cu-ATSM SUV measures from pretreatment to midtreatment were histology dependent: carcinomas experienced significant decreases in Cu-ATSM uptake (P<.05), whereas sarcomas did not (P>.20). Both histologies experienced significant decreases in FLT uptake (P<.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Spatial distributions of Cu-ATSM were very stable after a few fractions of radiation therapy. FLT spatial distributions were generally stable early in therapy, although they were significantly less stable than Cu-ATSM distributions. Canine tumors had significantly lower proliferative activity at midtreatment than at pretreatment, and they experienced histology-dependent changes in Cu-ATSM uptake.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24685446      PMCID: PMC4041912          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  30 in total

Review 1.  Towards multidimensional radiotherapy (MD-CRT): biological imaging and biological conformality.

Authors:  C C Ling; J Humm; S Larson; H Amols; Z Fuks; S Leibel; J A Koutcher
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Theragnostic imaging for radiation oncology: dose-painting by numbers.

Authors:  Søren M Bentzen
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 3.  Repopulation of cancer cells during therapy: an important cause of treatment failure.

Authors:  John J Kim; Ian F Tannock
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  DNA damage checkpoint control in cells exposed to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  George Iliakis; Ya Wang; Jun Guan; Huichen Wang
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  Assessment of regional tumor hypoxia using 18F-fluoromisonidazole and 64Cu(II)-diacetyl-bis(N4-methylthiosemicarbazone) positron emission tomography: Comparative study featuring microPET imaging, Po2 probe measurement, autoradiography, and fluorescent microscopy in the R3327-AT and FaDu rat tumor models.

Authors:  Joseph A O'Donoghue; Pat Zanzonico; Andrei Pugachev; Bixiu Wen; Peter Smith-Jones; Shangde Cai; Eva Burnazi; Ronald D Finn; Paul Burgman; Shutian Ruan; Jason S Lewis; Michael J Welch; C Clifton Ling; John L Humm
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Pretreatment oxygenation predicts radiation response in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  M Nordsmark; M Overgaard; J Overgaard
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Heterogeneity in intratumor correlations of 18F-FDG, 18F-FLT, and 61Cu-ATSM PET in canine sinonasal tumors.

Authors:  Tyler J Bradshaw; Stephen R Bowen; Ngoneh Jallow; Lisa J Forrest; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Reoxygenation after single irradiation in rodent tumors of different types and sizes.

Authors:  R Murata; Y Shibamoto; K Sasai; N Oya; T Shibata; T Takagi; M Abe
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 9.  Spontaneous and genetically engineered animal models; use in preclinical cancer drug development.

Authors:  K Hansen; C Khanna
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Patterns of failure in patients receiving definitive and postoperative IMRT for head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  K S Clifford Chao; Gokhan Ozyigit; Binh N Tran; Mustafa Cengiz; James F Dempsey; Daniel A Low
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  5 in total

1.  Technology for Innovation in Radiation Oncology.

Authors:  Indrin J Chetty; Mary K Martel; David A Jaffray; Stanley H Benedict; Stephen M Hahn; Ross Berbeco; James Deye; Robert Jeraj; Brian Kavanagh; Sunil Krishnan; Nancy Lee; Daniel A Low; David Mankoff; Lawrence B Marks; Daniel Ollendorf; Harald Paganetti; Brian Ross; Ramon Alfredo C Siochi; Robert D Timmerman; John W Wong
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Use of Molecular Imaging Markers of Glycolysis, Hypoxia and Proliferation ((18)F-FDG, (64)Cu-ATSM and (18)F-FLT) in a Dog with Fibrosarcoma: The Importance of Individualized Treatment Planning and Monitoring.

Authors:  Kamilla Westarp Zornhagen; Malene M Clausen; Anders E Hansen; Ian Law; Fintan J McEvoy; Svend A Engelholm; Andreas Kjær; Annemarie T Kristensen
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2015-09-11

Review 3.  Towards multidimensional radiotherapy: key challenges for treatment individualisation.

Authors:  Iuliana Toma-Dasu; Alexandru Dasu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 4.  Imaging in Non-neurologic Oncologic Treatment Planning of the Head and Neck.

Authors:  Katherine S Hansen; Michael S Kent
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-03-28

Review 5.  The Importance of the Tumor Microenvironment and Hypoxia in Delivering a Precision Medicine Approach to Veterinary Oncology.

Authors:  Mark Gray; James Meehan; Arran K Turnbull; Carlos Martínez-Pérez; Charlene Kay; Lisa Y Pang; David J Argyle
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-11-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.