Literature DB >> 22721784

The decreased responsiveness of lumbar muscle spindles to a prior history of spinal muscle lengthening is graded with the magnitude of change in vertebral position.

Weiqing Ge1, Joel G Pickar.   

Abstract

In the lumbar spine, muscle spindle responsiveness is affected by the duration and direction of a lumbar vertebra's positional history. The purpose of the present study was to determine the relationship between changes in the magnitude of a lumbar vertebra's positional history and the responsiveness of lumbar muscle spindles to a subsequent vertebral position and subsequent vertebral movement. Neural activity from multifidus and longissimus muscle spindle afferents in deeply anesthetized cats was recorded while creating positional histories of the L(6) vertebra. History was induced using a displacement-controlled feedback motor. It held the L(6) vertebra for 4 s at an intermediate position (hold-intermediate at 0 mm) and at seven positions from 0.07 to 1.55 mm more ventralward and dorsalward which lengthened (hold-long) and shortened (hold-short) the lumbar muscles. Following the conditioning hold positions, L(6) was returned to the intermediate position. Muscle spindle discharge at this position and during a lengthening movement was compared between hold-intermediate and hold-short conditionings and between hold-intermediate and hold-short conditionings. We found that regardless of conditioning magnitude, the seven shortening magnitudes similarly increased muscle spindle responsiveness to both vertebral position and movement. In contrast, the seven lengthening magnitudes produced a graded decrease in responsiveness to both position and movement. The decrease to position became maximal following conditioning magnitudes of ∼0.75 mm. The decrease to movement did not reach a maximum even with conditioning magnitudes of ∼1.55 mm. The data suggest that the fidelity of proprioceptive information from muscle spindles in the low back is influenced by small changes in the previous length history of lumbar muscles.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22721784      PMCID: PMC3749777          DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  28 in total

1.  Response of trunk muscle coactivation to changes in spinal stability.

Authors:  K P Granata; K F Orishimo
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Plane of vertebral movement eliciting muscle lengthening history in the low back influences the decrease in muscle spindle responsiveness of the cat.

Authors:  Weiqing Ge; Dong-Yuan Cao; Cynthia R Long; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-09-29

3.  Vertebral position alters paraspinal muscle spindle responsiveness in the feline spine: effect of positioning duration.

Authors:  Weiqing Ge; Cynthia R Long; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Muscle spindle signals combine with the sense of effort to indicate limb position.

Authors:  J A Winter; T J Allen; U Proske
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Role of reflex dynamics in spinal stability: intrinsic muscle stiffness alone is insufficient for stability.

Authors:  Kevin M Moorhouse; Kevin P Granata
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 6.  Spine stability: the six blind men and the elephant.

Authors:  N Peter Reeves; Kumpati S Narendra; Jacek Cholewicki
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  Evidence from proprioception of fusimotor coactivation during voluntary contractions in humans.

Authors:  Trevor J Allen; Gabrielle E Ansems; Uwe Proske
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 2.969

8.  Time course for the development of muscle history in lumbar paraspinal muscle spindles arising from changes in vertebral position.

Authors:  Weiqing Ge; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 9.  Can acute low back pain result from segmental spinal buckling during sub-maximal activities? A review of the current literature.

Authors:  Richard Preuss; Joyce Fung
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2005-02

10.  The influence of muscle spindle discharge on the human H reflex and the monosynaptic reflex in the cat.

Authors:  S A Wood; J E Gregory; U Proske
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  6 in total

1.  Neural responses to the mechanical characteristics of high velocity, low amplitude spinal manipulation: Effect of specific contact site.

Authors:  William R Reed; Cynthia R Long; Gregory N Kawchuk; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2015-03-27

2.  Effect of spinal manipulation on the development of history-dependent responsiveness of lumbar paraspinal muscle spindles in the cat.

Authors:  Dong-Yuan Cao; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-06

3.  Neural responses to the mechanical parameters of a high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation: effect of preload parameters.

Authors:  William R Reed; Cynthia R Long; Gregory N Kawchuk; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 1.437

4.  Effect of changing lumbar stiffness by single facet joint dysfunction on the responsiveness of lumbar muscle spindles to vertebral movement.

Authors:  William R Reed; Joel G Pickar; Cynthia R Long
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-06

5.  Effects of unilateral facet fixation and facetectomy on muscle spindle responsiveness during simulated spinal manipulation in an animal model.

Authors:  William R Reed; Cynthia R Long; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 1.437

6.  A quasi-experimental study on the effects of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization on mechanosensitive neurons.

Authors:  Weiqing Ge; Emily Roth; Alyssa Sansone
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-04-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.