Literature DB >> 17938002

Time course for the development of muscle history in lumbar paraspinal muscle spindles arising from changes in vertebral position.

Weiqing Ge1, Joel G Pickar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: In neutral spinal postures with low loading moments, the lumbar spine is not inherently stable. Small compromises in paraspinal muscle activity may affect lumbar spinal biomechanics. Proprioceptive feedback from muscle spindles is considered important for control of muscle activity. Because skeletal muscle and muscle spindles are thixotropic, their length history changes their physical properties. The present study explores a mechanism that can affect the responsiveness of paraspinal muscle spindles in the lumbar spine.
PURPOSE: This study has the following two aims: to extend our previous findings demonstrating the history-dependent effects of vertebral position on the responsiveness of lumbar paraspinal muscle spindles and to determine the time course for these effects. Based on previous studies, if a cross-bridge mechanism underlies these thixotropic effects, then the relationship between the magnitude of spindle discharge and the duration of the vertebral position will be one of exponential decay or growth. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: A neurophysiological study using the lumbar spine in a feline model.
METHODS: The discharge from individual muscle spindle afferents innervating lumbar paraspinal muscles in response to the duration and direction of vertebral position was obtained from teased filaments in the L(6) dorsal roots of 30 Nembutal-anesthetized cats. The L(6) vertebra was controlled using a displacement-controlled feedback motor and was held in each of three different conditioning positions for durations of 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 seconds. Two of the conditioning positions stretched or shortened the lumbar muscles relative to an intermediate conditioning position. Conditioning positions for all cats ranged from 0.9 to 2.0mm dorsal- and ventralward relative to the intermediate position. These magnitudes were determined based on the displacement that loaded the L(6) vertebra to 50% to 60% of the cat's body weight. Conditioning was thought to simulate a motion segment's position that might be passively maintained because of fixation, external load, a prolonged posture, or structural change. After conditioning positions that stretched (hold-long) and shortened (hold-short) the spindle, the vertebra was repositioned identically and muscle spindle discharge at rest and to movement was compared with having conditioned at the intermediate position.
RESULTS: Lumbar vertebral positions maintained for less than 2 seconds were capable of evoking different discharge rates from lumbar paraspinal muscle spindles despite the vertebra having been returned to an identical locations. Both resting spindle discharge and their responsiveness to movement were altered. Conditioning vertebral positions that stretched the spindles decreased spindle activity and positions that unloaded the spindles increased spindle activity on returning the vertebra to its identical original (intermediate) position. The magnitude of these effects increased as conditioning duration increased to 2 seconds. These effects developed with a time course following a first-order exponential reaching a maximal value after approximately 4 seconds of history. The time constant for a hold-short history was 2.6 seconds and for a hold-long history was approximately half of that at 1.1 seconds.
CONCLUSIONS: Thixotropic contributions to the responsiveness of muscle spindles in the low back are caused by the rapid, spontaneous formation of stable crossbridges. These sensory alterations because of vertebral history would represent a proprioceptive input not necessarily representative of the current state of intersegmental positioning. As such, they would constitute a source of inaccurate sensory feedback. Examples are presented suggesting ways in which this novel finding may affect spinal physiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17938002      PMCID: PMC2366132          DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  26 in total

Review 1.  Why adult mammalian intrafusal and extrafusal fibers contain different myosin heavy-chain isoforms.

Authors:  J M Walro; J Kucera
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 2.  Do cross-bridges contribute to the tension during stretch of passive muscle?

Authors:  U Proske; D L Morgan
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  Vertebral position alters paraspinal muscle spindle responsiveness in the feline spine: effect of positioning duration.

Authors:  Weiqing Ge; Cynthia R Long; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Mathematical models of proprioceptors. I. Control and transduction in the muscle spindle.

Authors:  Milana P Mileusnic; Ian E Brown; Ning Lan; Gerald E Loeb
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Muscular response to sudden load. A tool to evaluate fatigue and rehabilitation.

Authors:  D G Wilder; A R Aleksiev; M L Magnusson; M H Pope; K F Spratt; V K Goel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Mammalian muscle spindle: peripheral mechanisms.

Authors:  C C Hunt
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 37.312

7.  After-effects of fusimotor stimulation on the response of muscle spindle primary afferent endings.

Authors:  M C Brown; G M Goodwin; P B Matthews
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Use of noninvasive techniques for quantification of spinal range-of-motion in normal subjects and chronic low-back dysfunction patients.

Authors:  T G Mayer; A F Tencer; S Kristoferson; V Mooney
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Changes in size of the stretch reflex of cat and man attributed to aftereffects in muscle spindles.

Authors:  J E Gregory; D L Morgan; U Proske
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Head repositioning errors in normal student volunteers: a possible tool to assess the neck's neuromuscular system.

Authors:  Edward F Owens; Charles N R Henderson; M Ram Gudavalli; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2006-03-06
View more
  10 in total

1.  Plane of vertebral movement eliciting muscle lengthening history in the low back influences the decrease in muscle spindle responsiveness of the cat.

Authors:  Weiqing Ge; Dong-Yuan Cao; Cynthia R Long; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-09-29

2.  Lengthening but not shortening history of paraspinal muscle spindles in the low back alters their dynamic sensitivity.

Authors:  Dong-Yuan Cao; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The decreased responsiveness of lumbar muscle spindles to a prior history of spinal muscle lengthening is graded with the magnitude of change in vertebral position.

Authors:  Weiqing Ge; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.368

4.  Thoracolumbar fascia does not influence proprioceptive signaling from lumbar paraspinal muscle spindles in the cat.

Authors:  Dong-Yuan Cao; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Integrated neuroscience program: an alternative approach to teaching neurosciences to chiropractic students.

Authors:  Xiaohua He; James La Rose; Niu Zhang
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2009

6.  Effect of spinal manipulation on the development of history-dependent responsiveness of lumbar paraspinal muscle spindles in the cat.

Authors:  Dong-Yuan Cao; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-06

7.  Neural responses to the mechanical parameters of a high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation: effect of preload parameters.

Authors:  William R Reed; Cynthia R Long; Gregory N Kawchuk; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 1.437

8.  Effects of Manual Therapy and Mechanical Massage on Spinal Alignment, Extension Range of Motion, Back Extensor Electromyographic Activity, and Thoracic Extension Strength in Individuals with Thoracic Hyperkyphosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sung-Hoon Jung; Ui-Jae Hwang; Sun-Hee Ahn; Jun-Hee Kim; Oh-Yun Kwon
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.629

9.  Sensorimotor function of the cervical spine in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Neil J Artz; Michael A Adams; Patricia Dolan
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  A quasi-experimental study on the effects of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization on mechanosensitive neurons.

Authors:  Weiqing Ge; Emily Roth; Alyssa Sansone
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-04-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.