Literature DB >> 26623103

A comparative analysis of lung cancer patients treated with lobectomy via three-dimensional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus two-dimensional resection.

Chengliang Yang1, Lili Mo1, Yegang Ma1, Guilin Peng1, Yi Ren1, Wei Wang1, Yongyu Liu1, Jianxing He1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) vision systems are now available for thoracic surgery. It is unclear whether 3D video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is superior to 2D VATS systems. This study aimed to compare the operative and perioperative data between 2D and 3D VATS lobectomy (VTL) and to identify the actual role of 3D VTL in thoracic surgery.
METHODS: A two-institutional comparative study was conducted from November 2013 to November 2014 at Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute and the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, China, of 300 patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients were assigned to receive either the 3D VATS (n=150) or 2D VATS (n=150) lobectomy. The operative and perioperative data between 2D VATS and 3D VATS were compared.
RESULTS: Although there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the incidence of each single complication, a significantly less operative time was found in the 3D VATS group (145 min) than in the 2D VATS group (176 min) (P=0.006). Postoperative mortality rates in 3D VATS and 2D VATS groups were both 0%.No significant difference was found between groups for estimated blood loss (P=0.893), chest drainage tube placement time (P=0.397), length of hospital stay (P=0.199), number of lymph nodes resected (P=0.397), postoperative complications (P=0.882) and cost of care (P=0.913).
CONCLUSIONS: Early results of this study demonstrate that the 3D VATS lobectomy procedure can be performed with less operative time. 3D VATS and 2D VATS lobectomy are both safe procedures in first-line surgical treatment of NSCLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS); lobectomy; three-dimensional (3D)

Year:  2015        PMID: 26623103      PMCID: PMC4635286          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.10.59

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  29 in total

1.  Three-dimensional laparoscopy. Gadget or progress? A randomized trial on the efficacy of three-dimensional laparoscopy.

Authors:  M D Mueller; C Camartin; E Dreher; W Hänggi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The effect of a second-generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons.

Authors:  N Taffinder; S G Smith; J Huber; R C Russell; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Effect of binocular stereopsis on surgical manipulation performance and fatigue when using a stereoscopic endoscope.

Authors:  Yasushi Yamauchi; Kazuhiko Shinohara
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2005

Review 4.  Amblyopia: prevalence, natural history, functional effects and treatment.

Authors:  Ann L Webber; Joanne Wood
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.742

5.  A meta-analysis of unmatched and matched patients comparing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and conventional open lobectomy.

Authors:  Christopher Cao; Con Manganas; Su C Ang; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-05

6.  Thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Authors:  T J Kirby; T W Rice
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  VATS lobectomy reduces cytokine responses compared with conventional surgery.

Authors:  A P Yim; S Wan; T W Lee; A A Arifi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification of malignant tumours.

Authors:  Peter Goldstraw; John Crowley; Kari Chansky; Dorothy J Giroux; Patti A Groome; Ramon Rami-Porta; Pieter E Postmus; Valerie Rusch; Leslie Sobin
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 15.609

9.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy reduces the morbidity after surgery for stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Masashi Muraoka; Tadayuki Oka; Shinji Akamine; Tsutomu Tagawa; Akihiro Nakamura; Satoshi Hashizume; Keitaro Matsumoto; Masato Araki; Yutaka Tagawa; Takeshi Nagayasu
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2006-02

10.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is more favorable than thoracotomy for resection of clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Bryan A Whitson; Rafael S Andrade; Adam Boettcher; Ricardo Bardales; Robert A Kratzke; Peter S Dahlberg; Michael A Maddaus
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  7 in total

1.  Three-Dimensional Versus Two-Dimensional Video-Assisted Endoscopic Surgery: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Data.

Authors:  Hengrui Liang; Wenhua Liang; Zhao Lei; Zhichao Liu; Wei Wang; Jiaxi He; Yuan Zeng; Weizhe Huang; Manting Wang; Yuehan Chen; Jianxing He
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Three-dimensional video-assisted thoracic surgery for pulmonary resections: an update.

Authors:  Duilio Divisi; Mirko Barone; Roberto Crisci
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-06-04

Review 3.  Challenges in complex video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and spontaneous respiration video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery procedures.

Authors:  Jingpei Li; Hui Liu; Jun Liu; Xusen Zou; Lili Mo; Hui Pan; Guilin Peng; Wenlong Shao; Lindsey Hamblin; Lixia Liang; Qinglong Dong; Jianxing He
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-03-17

4.  Technological innovation in video-assisted thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Mehmet Oğuzhan Özyurtkan; Erkan Kaba; Alper Toker
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-02-15

5.  Application of a three-dimensional video system in the training for uniportal thoracoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Kook Nam Han; Hyun Koo Kim; Young Ho Choi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Three-Dimensional Thoracoscopic Surgery for Spine Fractures: A Technical Report With First Results and Experiences.

Authors:  Arjen J Smits; Jaap Deunk; Frank W Bloemers
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-05-10

Review 7.  Robotic versus thoracoscopic lung resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Emmert; Carmen Straube; Judith Buentzel; Christian Roever
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.889

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.