OBJECTIVES: Clinical decision support (CDS), such as computerized alerts, improves prescribing in the setting of acute kidney injury (AKI), but considerable opportunity remains to improve patient safety. The authors sought to determine whether pharmacy surveillance of AKI patients could detect and prevent medication errors that are not corrected by automated interventions. METHODS: The authors conducted a randomized clinical trial among 396 patients admitted to an academic, tertiary care hospital between June 1, 2010 and August 31, 2010 with an acute 0.5 mg/dl change in serum creatinine over 48 hours and a nephrotoxic or renally cleared medication order. Patients randomly assigned to the intervention group received surveillance from a clinical pharmacist using a web-based surveillance tool to monitor drug prescribing and kidney function trends. CDS alerting and standard pharmacy services were active in both study arms. Outcome measures included blinded adjudication of potential adverse drug events (pADEs), adverse drug events (ADEs) and time to provider modification or discontinuation of targeted nephrotoxic or renally cleared medications. RESULTS:Potential ADEs or ADEs occurred for 104 (8.0%) of control and 99 (7.1%) of intervention patient-medication pairs (p=0.4). Additionally, the time to provider modification or discontinuation of targeted nephrotoxic or renally cleared medications did not differ between control and intervention patients (33.4 hrs vs. 30.3 hrs, p=0.3). CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacy surveillance had no incremental benefit over previously implemented CDS alerts.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Clinical decision support (CDS), such as computerized alerts, improves prescribing in the setting of acute kidney injury (AKI), but considerable opportunity remains to improve patient safety. The authors sought to determine whether pharmacy surveillance of AKI patients could detect and prevent medication errors that are not corrected by automated interventions. METHODS: The authors conducted a randomized clinical trial among 396 patients admitted to an academic, tertiary care hospital between June 1, 2010 and August 31, 2010 with an acute 0.5 mg/dl change in serum creatinine over 48 hours and a nephrotoxic or renally cleared medication order. Patients randomly assigned to the intervention group received surveillance from a clinical pharmacist using a web-based surveillance tool to monitor drug prescribing and kidney function trends. CDS alerting and standard pharmacy services were active in both study arms. Outcome measures included blinded adjudication of potential adverse drug events (pADEs), adverse drug events (ADEs) and time to provider modification or discontinuation of targeted nephrotoxic or renally cleared medications. RESULTS: Potential ADEs or ADEs occurred for 104 (8.0%) of control and 99 (7.1%) of intervention patient-medication pairs (p=0.4). Additionally, the time to provider modification or discontinuation of targeted nephrotoxic or renally cleared medications did not differ between control and intervention patients (33.4 hrs vs. 30.3 hrs, p=0.3). CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacy surveillance had no incremental benefit over previously implemented CDS alerts.
Authors: Lina Bladh; Ellinor Ottosson; John Karlsson; Lars Klintberg; Susanna M Wallerstedt Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2011-01-05 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Allison B McCoy; Lemuel R Waitman; Cynthia S Gadd; Ioana Danciu; James P Smith; Julia B Lewis; Jonathan S Schildcrout; Josh F Peterson Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2010-08-14 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Ross Koppel; Joshua P Metlay; Abigail Cohen; Brian Abaluck; A Russell Localio; Stephen E Kimmel; Brian L Strom Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-03-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jennifer R Pippins; Tejal K Gandhi; Claus Hamann; Chima D Ndumele; Stephanie A Labonville; Ellen K Diedrichsen; Marcy G Carty; Andrew S Karson; Ishir Bhan; Christopher M Coley; Catherine L Liang; Alexander Turchin; Patricia C McCarthy; Jeffrey L Schnipper Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-06-19 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Josh F Peterson; Sunil Kripalani; Ioana Danciu; Debbie Harrell; Marketa Marvanova; Amanda S Mixon; Carmen Rodriguez; James S Powers Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2014-11-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Michael Haase; Andreas Kribben; Walter Zidek; Jürgen Floege; Christian Albert; Berend Isermann; Bernt-Peter Robra; Anja Haase-Fielitz Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Judith W Dexheimer; Eric S Kirkendall; Michal Kouril; Philip A Hagedorn; Thomas Minich; Leo L Duan; Monifa Mahdi; Rhonda Szczesniak; S Andrew Spooner Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Mohammed Al-Jaghbeer; Dilhari Dealmeida; Andrew Bilderback; Richard Ambrosino; John A Kellum Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2017-11-02 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Zachary L Cox; Allison B McCoy; Michael E Matheny; Gautam Bhave; Neeraja B Peterson; Edward D Siew; Julia Lewis; Ioana Danciu; Aihua Bian; Ayumi Shintani; T Alp Ikizler; Erin B Neal; Josh F Peterson Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-03-28 Impact factor: 8.237