Literature DB >> 22716081

Comparison of bacteria and fungus-binding mesh, foam and gauze as fillers in negative pressure wound therapy--pressure transduction, wound edge contraction, microvascular blood flow and fluid retention.

Malin Malmsjö1, Richard Ingemansson, Sandra Lindstedt, Lotta Gustafsson.   

Abstract

Bacteria- and fungus-binding mesh binds with and inactivates bacteria and fungus, which makes it an interesting alternative, wound filler for negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). This study was conducted to compare the performance of pathogen-binding mesh, foam and gauze as wound fillers in NPWT with regard to pressure transduction, fluid retention, wound contraction and microvascular blood flow. Wounds on the backs of 16 pigs were filled with pathogen-binding mesh, foam or gauze and treated with NPWT. The immediate effects of 0, -40, -60, -80 and -120 mmHg, on pressure transduction and blood flow were examined in eight pigs using laser Doppler velocimetry. Wound contraction and fluid retention were studied during 72 hours of NPWT at -80 and -120 mmHg in the other eight pigs. Pathogen-binding mesh, gauze and foam provide similar pressure transduction to the wound bed during NPWT. Blood flow was found to decrease 0.5 cm laterally from the wound edge and increase 2.5 cm from the wound edge, but was unaltered 5.0 cm from the wound edge. The increase in blood flow was similar with all wound fillers. The decrease in blood flow was more pronounced with foam than with gauze and pathogen-binding mesh. Similarly, wound contraction was more pronounced with foam, than with gauze and pathogen-binding mesh. Wound fluid retention was the same in foam and pathogen-binding mesh, while more fluid was retained in the wound when using gauze. The blood flow 0.5-5 cm from the wound edge and the contraction of the wound during NPWT were similar when using pathogen-binding mesh and gauze. Wound fluid was efficiently removed when using pathogen-binding mesh, which may explain previous findings that granulation tissue formation is more rapid under pathogen-binding mesh than under gauze. This, in combination with its pathogen-binding properties, makes this mesh an interesting wound filler for use in NPWT.
© 2012 The Authors. International Wound Journal © 2012 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Medicalhelplines.com Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood flow; Experimental surgery; Negative pressure wound therapy; Wound dressing; Wound healing

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22716081      PMCID: PMC7950607          DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01029.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  34 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based recommendations for the use of negative pressure wound therapy in chronic wounds: steps towards an international consensus.

Authors:  S Vig; C Dowsett; L Berg; C Caravaggi; P Rome; H Birke-Sorensen; A Bruhin; M Chariker; M Depoorter; R Dunn; F Duteille; F Ferreira; J M Francos Martínez; G Grudzien; D Hudson; S Ichioka; R Ingemansson; S Jeffery; E Krug; C Lee; M Malmsjo; N Runkel; R Martin; J Smith
Journal:  J Tissue Viability       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 2.932

Review 2.  [Negative pressure wound therapy. Knowledge of effect mechanisms and complications yield new possibilities].

Authors:  Ola Borgquist; Richard Ingemansson; Sandra Lindstedt; Malin Malmsjö
Journal:  Lakartidningen       Date:  2011 Nov 16-22

Review 3.  Mechanisms and clinical applications of the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) Device: a review.

Authors:  Mark L Venturi; Christopher E Attinger; Ali N Mesbahi; Christopher L Hess; Katherine S Graw
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 7.403

Review 4.  Clinical approach to wounds: débridement and wound bed preparation including the use of dressings and wound-healing adjuvants.

Authors:  Christopher E Attinger; Jeffrey E Janis; John Steinberg; Jaime Schwartz; Ali Al-Attar; Kara Couch
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Negative-pressure wound therapy II: negative-pressure wound therapy and increased perfusion. Just an illusion?

Authors:  Nicolas Kairinos; Anda M Voogd; Pieter H Botha; Tessa Kotze; Delawir Kahn; Donald A Hudson; Michael Solomons
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Retrospective clinical evaluation of gauze-based negative pressure wound therapy.

Authors:  Penny E Campbell; Gary S Smith; Jennifer M Smith
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 7.  The role of matrix metalloproteinases in wound healing.

Authors:  David G Armstrong; Edward B Jude
Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc       Date:  2002-01

8.  Effect of TNP on the microbiology of venous leg ulcers: a pilot study.

Authors:  M Khashram; P Huggan; R Ikram; S Chambers; J A Roake; D R Lewis
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.072

9.  Microdeformational wound therapy: effects on angiogenesis and matrix metalloproteinases in chronic wounds of 3 debilitated patients.

Authors:  Arin K Greene; Mark Puder; Roopali Roy; Danielle Arsenault; Stephanie Kwei; Marsha A Moses; Dennis P Orgill
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.539

10.  Use of bacteria- and fungus-binding mesh in negative pressure wound therapy provides significant granulation tissue without tissue ingrowth.

Authors:  Malin Malmsjö; Sandra Lindstedt; Richard Ingemansson; Lotta Gustafsson
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2014-01-17
View more
  1 in total

1.  Aged garlic extract preserves cutaneous microcirculation in patients with increased risk for cardiovascular diseases: A double-blinded placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Martine Wlosinska; Ann-Christin Nilsson; Joanna Hlebowicz; Malin Malmsjö; Mohammed Fakhro; Sandra Lindstedt
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.315

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.