Literature DB >> 18494633

Retrospective clinical evaluation of gauze-based negative pressure wound therapy.

Penny E Campbell1, Gary S Smith, Jennifer M Smith.   

Abstract

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is an established modality in the treatment of challenging wounds. However, most existing clinical evidence is derived from the use of open-cell polyurethane foam at -125 mmHg. Alternative negative pressure systems are becoming available, which use gauze at a pressure of -80 mmHg. This study describes clinical results from a retrospective non comparative analysis of 30 patients treated with Chariker-Jeter gauze-based negative pressure systems (V1STA, Versatile-1 and EZ-Care; Smith & Nephew, Inc.) in a long-term care setting. The mean age of the patients was 72 years. The wounds consisted of chronic (n = 11), surgical dehiscence (n = 11) and surgical incision (n = 8). Wound volume and area were recorded at commencement and at the cessation of therapy. Discontinuation of therapy was instigated upon closure through secondary intention or when size and exudate were sufficiently reduced that the wounds could be managed by conventional wound dressing (median 41 days). An overall median reduction in wound volume of 88.0% (P < 0.001) and a 68.0% reduction in area (P < 0.001) compared with baseline were observed over the course of NPWT. The overall rate of volume reduction (15.1% per week) compares favourably with published data from foam-based systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18494633      PMCID: PMC7951744          DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2008.00485.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  12 in total

Review 1.  Negative pressure wound therapy: "a rose by any other name".

Authors:  Michael S Miller; Chris A Lowery
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.629

2.  Vacuum-assisted closure: state of clinic art.

Authors:  Louis C Argenta; Michael J Morykwas; Malcolm W Marks; Anthony J DeFranzo; Joseph A Molnar; Lisa R David
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  Vacuum-assisted closure: state of basic research and physiologic foundation.

Authors:  Michael J Morykwas; Jordan Simpson; Kally Punger; Anne Argenta; Lieveke Kremers; Joseph Argenta
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Surgical wound case studies with the versatile 1 wound vacuum system for negative pressure wound therapy.

Authors:  Penny E Campbell
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.741

5.  State-of-the-art treatment of chronic leg ulcers: A randomized controlled trial comparing vacuum-assisted closure (V.A.C.) with modern wound dressings.

Authors:  Jeroen D D Vuerstaek; Tryfon Vainas; Jan Wuite; Patty Nelemans; Martino H A Neumann; Joep C J M Veraart
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 6.  Subatmospheric pressure wound therapy and the vacuum-assisted closure device: basic science and current clinical successes.

Authors:  Christina M Plikaitis; Joseph A Molnar
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.166

7.  Negative pressure wound therapy: treating a venomous insect bite.

Authors:  Michael S Miller; Marta Ortegon; Cheryl McDaniel
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 8.  Evidence-based medicine: vacuum-assisted closure in wound care management.

Authors:  Judith E Hunter; Luc Teot; Raymond Horch; Paul E Banwell
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: animal studies and basic foundation.

Authors:  M J Morykwas; L C Argenta; E I Shelton-Brown; W McGuirt
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.539

10.  Negative pressure therapy is effective to manage a variety of wounds in infants and children.

Authors:  Shannon S McCord; Bindi J Naik-Mathuria; Kathy M Murphy; Kathy M McLane; Andre N Gay; C Bob Basu; Cara R Downey; Larry H Hollier; Oluyinka O Olutoye
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.617

View more
  18 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of gauze-based negative pressure wound therapy in challenging wounds.

Authors:  Umut Tuncel; Ünal Erkorkmaz; Aydın Turan
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Comparison of bacteria and fungus-binding mesh, foam and gauze as fillers in negative pressure wound therapy--pressure transduction, wound edge contraction, microvascular blood flow and fluid retention.

Authors:  Malin Malmsjö; Richard Ingemansson; Sandra Lindstedt; Lotta Gustafsson
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Clinical evaluation of improvised gauze-based negative pressure wound therapy in military wounds.

Authors:  Junaid Mansoor; Irfan Ellahi; Zartash Junaid; Adeel Habib; Uzair Ilyas
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Early use of negative pressure therapy in combination with silver dressings in a difficult breast abscess.

Authors:  Alastair J Richards; Sue M Hagelstein; Girish K Patel; Nicola M Ivins; Helen M Sweetland; Keith G Harding
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Negative pressure wound therapy using gauze and foam: histological, immunohistochemical and ultrasonography morphological analysis of the granulation tissue and scar tissue. Preliminary report of a clinical study.

Authors:  Marco Fraccalvieri; Enrico Zingarelli; Erind Ruka; Umberto Antoniotti; Renato Coda; Antonino Sarno; Maria Alessandra Bocchiotti; Stefano Bruschi
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  The influence on wound contraction and fluid evacuation of a rigid disc inserted to protect exposed organs during negative pressure wound therapy.

Authors:  Erik Anesäter; K Markus Roupé; Markus Roupé; Peter Robertsson; Ola Borgquist; Christian Torbrand; Richard Ingemansson; Sandra Lindstedt; Malin Malmsjö
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Impact of gauze-based NPWT on the patient and nursing experience in the treatment of challenging wounds.

Authors:  Theresa Hurd; Paul Chadwick; Julien Cote; John Cockwill; Trevor R Mole; Jennifer M Smith
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  Effects on heart pumping function when using foam and gauze for negative pressure wound therapy of sternotomy wounds.

Authors:  Malin Malmsjö; Sandra Lindstedt; Richard Ingemansson
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.637

9.  Demonstration of a microcurrent-generating wound care device for wound healing within a rehabilitation center patient population.

Authors:  Emily Whitcomb; Nina Monroe; Jennifer Hope-Higman; Penny Campbell
Journal:  J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec       Date:  2013-07-12

10.  Advanced wound therapies in the management of severe military lower limb trauma: a new perspective.

Authors:  S L A Jeffery
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2009-07-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.