Literature DB >> 15943495

Mechanisms and clinical applications of the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) Device: a review.

Mark L Venturi1, Christopher E Attinger, Ali N Mesbahi, Christopher L Hess, Katherine S Graw.   

Abstract

The use of sub-atmospheric pressure dressings, available commercially as the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) device, has been shown to be an effective way to accelerate healing of various wounds. The optimal sub-atmospheric pressure for wound healing appears to be approximately 125 mm Hg utilizing an alternating pressure cycle of 5 minutes of suction followed by 2 minutes off suction. Animal studies have demonstrated that this technique optimizes blood flow, decreases local tissue edema, and removes excessive fluid from the wound bed. These physiologic changes facilitate the removal of bacteria from the wound. Additionally, the cyclical application of sub-atmospheric pressure alters the cytoskeleton of the cells in the wound bed, triggering a cascade of intracellular signals that increases the rate of cell division and subsequent formation of granulation tissue. The combination of these mechanisms makes the VAC device an extremely versatile tool in the armamentarium of wound healing. This is evident in the VAC device's wide range of clinical applications, including treatment of infected surgical wounds, traumatic wounds, pressure ulcers, wounds with exposed bone and hardware, diabetic foot ulcers, and venous stasis ulcers. VAC has also proven useful in reconstruction of wounds by allowing elective planning of the definitive reconstructive surgery without jeopardizing the wound or outcome. Furthermore, VAC has significantly increased the skin graft success rate when used as a bolster over the freshly skin-grafted wound. VAC is generally well tolerated and, with few contraindications or complications, is fast becoming a mainstay of current wound care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15943495     DOI: 10.2165/00128071-200506030-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol        ISSN: 1175-0561            Impact factor:   7.403


  76 in total

1.  Comparison of bacteria and fungus-binding mesh, foam and gauze as fillers in negative pressure wound therapy--pressure transduction, wound edge contraction, microvascular blood flow and fluid retention.

Authors:  Malin Malmsjö; Richard Ingemansson; Sandra Lindstedt; Lotta Gustafsson
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Surgical Treatment of Pyoderma Gangrenosum with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Skin Grafting, Including Xenografts: Personal Experience and Comprehensive Review on 161 Cases.

Authors:  Klaus Eisendle; Tobias Thuile; Jenny Deluca; Maria Pichler
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  The diabetic foot: the importance of biofilms and wound bed preparation.

Authors:  Stephen C Davis; Lisa Martinez; Robert Kirsner
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 4.  Negative pressure wound therapy: evidence-based treatment for complex diabetic foot wounds.

Authors:  Jennifer J Suess; Paul J Kim; John S Steinberg
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.810

5.  Negative pressure wound therapy as an adjunct in healing of chronic wounds.

Authors:  Vijay Langer; Prem S Bhandari; Satyamoorthy Rajagopalan; Mrinal K Mukherjee
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Intra-abdominal Pressure Monitoring in Open Abdomen Management with Dynamic Abdominal Closure.

Authors:  A Ebru Sarer; Fahri Yetisir; Muhittin Aygar; Hasan Zafer Acar; Yılmaz Polat; Gokhan Osmanoglu
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 0.656

7.  Vacuum-assisted closure improves the incorporation of artificial dermis in soft tissue defects: Terudermis(®) and Pelnac(®).

Authors:  SuRak Eo; YoongSoo Kim; SangHun Cho
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  Results of endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure device for treatment of upper GI leaks.

Authors:  Marc Bludau; Hans F Fuchs; Till Herbold; Martin K H Maus; Hakan Alakus; Felix Popp; Jessica M Leers; Christiane J Bruns; Arnulf H Hölscher; Wolfgang Schröder; Seung-Hun Chon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Use of polypropylene mesh in contaminated and dirty strangulated hernias: short-term results.

Authors:  H Pandey; D S Thakur; U Somashekar; R Kothari; P Agarwal; D Sharma
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Does treatment of split-thickness skin grafts with negative-pressure wound therapy improve tissue markers of wound healing in a porcine experimental model?

Authors:  Christopher Ward; David Ciraulo; Michael Coulter; Steven Desjardins; Lucy Liaw; Sarah Peterson
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.313

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.