Literature DB >> 2271342

Dipyridamole magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison with thallium-201 emission tomography.

D J Pennell1, S R Underwood, P J Ell, R H Swanton, J M Walker, D B Longmore.   

Abstract

Limitation of space and motion artefact make magnetic resonance imaging during dynamic exercise difficult. Pharmacological stress with dipyridamole can be used as an alternative to exercise for thallium scanning. Forty patients with a history of angina and an abnormal exercise electrocardiogram were studied by dipyridamole thallium myocardial perfusion tomography and dipyridamole magnetic resonance wall motion imaging with a cine gradient refocused sequence. Images for both scans were obtained in the oblique horizontal and vertical long axis and short axis planes before and after pharmacological stress with dipyridamole. The myocardium was divided into nine segments for direct comparison of perfusion with wall motion. Segments were assessed visually into grades--normal, hypokinesis or reduced perfusion, and akinesis or very reduced perfusion. After dipyridamole there were reversible wall motion abnormalities in 24 (62%) of 39 patients with coronary artery disease and 24 (67%) of 36 patients with reversible thallium defects. The site of wall motion deterioration was always the site of a reversible thallium defect. Thallium defects affecting more than two segments were always associated with wall motion deterioration but most single segment thallium defects were undetected by magnetic resonance imaging. There was a significant correlation between detection of wall motion abnormality, the angiographic severity of coronary artery disease, and the induction of chest pain by dipyridamole. There were no significant differences in ventricular volume or ejection fraction changes after dipyridamole between the groups with and without detectable reversible wall motion changes but the normalised magnetic resonance signal intensity of the abnormally moving segments was significantly less than the signal intensity of the normal segments. In nine patients the change was apparent visually and it was maximal in the subendocardial region. Magnetic resonance imaging of reversible wall motion abnormalities in patients with coronary artery disease is feasible during pharmacological stress with dipyridamole and may be associated with a reduced magnetic resonance signal. The failure to show wall motion abnormalities in all cases of reversible thallium defects may be because the defect was small or because dipyridamole caused perfusion defects in the absence of myocardial ischaemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2271342      PMCID: PMC1224811          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.64.6.362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Heart J        ISSN: 0007-0769


  23 in total

1.  Myocardial imaging with dipyridamole: comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of 201Tl versus MUGA.

Authors:  D Harris; D Taylor; B Condon; D Ackery; N Conway
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1982

2.  Measurement of flow with NMR imaging using a gradient pulse and phase difference technique.

Authors:  D J Bryant; J A Payne; D N Firmin; D B Longmore
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Acute effect of intravenous dipyridamole on regional coronary hemodynamics and metabolism.

Authors:  R L Feldman; W W Nichols; C J Pepine; C R Conti
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Evaluation of coronary artery disease in the patient unable to exercise: alternatives to exercise stress testing.

Authors:  H G Stratmann; H L Kennedy
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  [A new pharmacological test for diagnosing coronary artery disease (author's transl)].

Authors:  M Tauchert; D W Behrenbeck; J Hötzel; H H Hilger
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1976-01-09       Impact factor: 0.628

6.  Dimensional accuracy of magnetic resonance in studies of the heart.

Authors:  D B Longmore; R H Klipstein; S R Underwood; D N Firmin; G N Hounsfield; M Watanabe; C Bland; K Fox; P A Poole-Wilson; R S Rees
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-06-15       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Exercise echocardiography: a clinically practical addition in the evaluation of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  W S Robertson; H Feigenbaum; W F Armstrong; J C Dillon; J O'Donnell; P W McHenry
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Persistence of regional left ventricular dysfunction after exercise-induced myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  D C Homans; E Sublett; X Z Dai; R J Bache
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Intravenous dipyridamole combined with isometric handgrip for near maximal acute increase in coronary flow in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  B G Brown; M A Josephson; R B Petersen; C D Pierce; M Wong; H S Hecht; E Bolson; H T Dodge
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Transluminal, subselective measurement of coronary artery blood flow velocity and vasodilator reserve in man.

Authors:  R F Wilson; D E Laughlin; P H Ackell; W M Chilian; M D Holida; C J Hartley; M L Armstrong; M L Marcus; C W White
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  13 in total

1.  Comparison of left ventricular function at rest and post-stress in patients with myocardial infarction: Evaluation with gated SPECT.

Authors:  C D Bavelaar-Croon; Y G America; D E Atsma; P Dibbets-Schneider; A H Zwinderman; M P Stokkel; E K Pauwels; E E van der Wall
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Cardiac magnetic resonance stress testing: results and prognosis.

Authors:  Amedeo Chiribiri; Nuno Bettencourt; Eike Nagel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Assessment of myocardial ischemia with cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Bobak Heydari; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.194

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of non-ischemic cardiomyopathies: current applications and future perspectives.

Authors:  Ilan Gottlieb; Robson Macedo; David A Bluemke; João A C Lima
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.214

7.  Assessment of magnetic resonance velocity mapping of global ventricular function during dobutamine infusion in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  D J Pennell; D N Firmin; P Burger; G Z Yang; C C Manzara; P J Ell; R H Swanton; J M Walker; S R Underwood; D B Longmore
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-08

8.  Identification of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenoses by dipyridamole-magnetic resonance imaging and 99mTc-methoxyisobutyl-isonitrile-SPECT.

Authors:  F M Baer; K Smolarz; P Theissen; E Voth; H Schicha; U Sechtem
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1993-06

Review 9.  Myocardial viability: what do we need?

Authors:  H Schoeder; M Friedrich; H Topp
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-09

Review 10.  Cardiac MRI for myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  Caroline Daly; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.