Literature DB >> 24066194

Cardiac MRI for myocardial ischemia.

Caroline Daly1, Raymond Y Kwong.   

Abstract

Proper assessment of the physiologic impact of coronary artery stenosis on the LV myocardium can affect patient prognosis and treatment decisions. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) assesses myocardial perfusion by imaging the myocardium during a first-pass transit of an intravenous gadolinium bolus, with spatial and temporal resolution substantially higher than nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging. Coupled with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging for infarction during the same imaging session, CMR with vasodilating stress perfusion imaging can qualitatively and quantitatively assess the myocardial extent of hypoperfusion from coronary stenosis independent of infarcted myocardium. This approach has been validated experimentally, and multiple clinical trials have established its diagnostic robustness when compared to stress single-photon emission computed tomography. In specialized centers, dobutamine stress CMR has been shown to have incremental diagnostic value above stress echocardiography due to its high imaging quality and ability to image the heart with no restriction of imaging window. This paper reviews the technical aspects, diagnostic utility, prognostic values, challenges to clinical adaptation, and future developments of stress CMR imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CMR; cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; coronary artery stenosis; dobutamine stress CMR; myocardial ischemia; perfusion

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24066194      PMCID: PMC3782318          DOI: 10.14797/mdcj-9-3-123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J        ISSN: 1947-6108


  46 in total

1.  Stress myocardial perfusion imaging by CMR provides strong prognostic value to cardiac events regardless of patient's sex.

Authors:  Otavio R Coelho-Filho; Luciana F Seabra; François-Pierre Mongeon; Shuaib M Abdullah; Sanjeev A Francis; Ron Blankstein; Marcelo F Di Carli; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-08

2.  Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study.

Authors:  Nico H J Pijls; Pepijn van Schaardenburgh; Ganesh Manoharan; Eric Boersma; Jan-Willem Bech; Marcel van't Veer; Frits Bär; Jan Hoorntje; Jacques Koolen; William Wijns; Bernard de Bruyne
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Complementary prognostic values of stress myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement imaging by cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Kevin Steel; Ryan Broderick; Vijay Gandla; Eric Larose; Frederick Resnic; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Kenneth A Brown; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial.

Authors:  Juerg Schwitter; Christian M Wacker; Albert C van Rossum; Massimo Lombardi; Nidal Al-Saadi; Hakan Ahlstrom; Thorsten Dill; Henrik B W Larsson; Scott D Flamm; Moritz Marquardt; Lars Johansson
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-01-21       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) study.

Authors:  William F Fearon; Pim A L Tonino; Bernard De Bruyne; Uwe Siebert; Nico H J Pijls
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Prognostic value of normal adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Guenter Pilz; Andrea Jeske; Markus Klos; Eman Ali; Berthold Hoefling; Roland Scheck; Peter Bernhardt
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  k-Space and time sensitivity encoding-accelerated myocardial perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T: comparison with 1.5 T.

Authors:  Sven Plein; Juerg Schwitter; Daniel Suerder; John P Greenwood; Peter Boesiger; Sebastian Kozerke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kiran R Nandalur; Ben A Dwamena; Asim F Choudhri; Mohan R Nandalur; Ruth C Carlos
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Validation of magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with fractional flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Stuart Watkins; Ross McGeoch; Jonathan Lyne; Tracey Steedman; Richard Good; Mairi-Jean McLaughlin; Tony Cunningham; Vladimir Bezlyak; Ian Ford; Henry J Dargie; Keith G Oldroyd
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging at 3-tesla for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparison with 1.5-tesla.

Authors:  Adrian S H Cheng; Tammy J Pegg; Theodoros D Karamitsos; Nick Searle; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Robin P Choudhury; Adrian P Banning; Stefan Neubauer; Matthew D Robson; Joseph B Selvanayagam
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Applications of PET-MR Imaging in Cardiovascular Disorders.

Authors:  Rhanderson Cardoso; Thorsten M Leucker
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2020-07-21

Review 2.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for structural heart disease.

Authors:  Yiling Situ; Samuel C M Birch; Camila Moreyra; Cameron J Holloway
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2020-04

Review 3.  Myocardial blood flow quantification for evaluation of coronary artery disease by positron emission tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography.

Authors:  Alfonso H Waller; Ron Blankstein; Raymond Y Kwong; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Assessment of Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Pictorial Review.

Authors:  Cristina Ivette Olivas-Chacon; Carola Mullins; Agnieszka Solberg; Nassim Akle; Jesus E Calleros; Luis R Ramos-Duran
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2015-05-22

5.  MnO nanoparticles with potential application in magnetic resonance imaging and drug delivery for myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Zheng; Hong Zhang; Yuping Hu; Lu Bai; Jingyi Xue
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-10-08

6.  Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion at Rest and During Stress Using Dynamic First-Pass Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Healthy Dogs.

Authors:  Henning Richter; Patrick R Kircher; Fabiola B Joerger; Erika Bruellmann; Matthias Dennler
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-09-04

7.  MR image analysis of ex-vivo mouse model of heart ischemia.

Authors:  Faiz Alqarni; Mohammed Alsaadi; Fayka Karem
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 8.  Knee orthopedics as a template for the temporomandibular joint.

Authors:  Benjamin J Bielajew; Ryan P Donahue; M Gabriela Espinosa; Boaz Arzi; Dean Wang; David C Hatcher; Nikolaos K Paschos; Mark E K Wong; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Cell Rep Med       Date:  2021-04-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.