Literature DB >> 22711234

The effects of prolonged cathodal direct current stimulation on the excitatory and inhibitory circuits of the ipsilateral and contralateral motor cortex.

V Di Lazzaro1, F Manganelli, M Dileone, F Notturno, M Esposito, M Capasso, R Dubbioso, M Pace, F Ranieri, G Minicuci, L Santoro, A Uncini.   

Abstract

Weak cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the human hand area modulates corticospinal excitability with a suppression of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The changes in excitability persist beyond the time of stimulation if tDCS is given for several minutes and can remain stable for an hour or more. The aim of present study was to evaluate whether a long-lasting suppression of cortical excitability could be induced by prolonged cathodal tDCS (20 min of stimulation). We also explored the impact of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene polymorphisms, on tDCS after-effects. Cortical excitability to single and paired-pulse TMS was evaluated both for the stimulated and contralateral hemisphere, before and up to 24 h after 20 min of cathodal tDCS. We evaluated threshold and amplitude of MEPs, short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF). tDCS produced a pronounced suppression of MEP amplitude that was still significant at 3 h after the end of stimulation. The BDNF genotype had not influence on tDCS after-effects. Thresholds for MEPs, SICI and ICF were not affected. No significant effect was observed in the contralateral hemisphere. Twenty minutes of cathodal tDCS is capable of inducing a long-lasting suppression of the excitability of the human motor cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22711234     DOI: 10.1007/s00702-012-0845-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)        ISSN: 0300-9564            Impact factor:   3.575


  34 in total

1.  Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortex on corticospinal and transcallosal excitability.

Authors:  N Lang; M A Nitsche; W Paulus; J C Rothwell; R N Lemon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Preconditioning of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence for homeostatic plasticity in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Hartwig R Siebner; Nicolas Lang; Vincenzo Rizzo; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus; Roger N Lemon; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-03-31       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Modulating neuronal excitability in the motor cortex with tDCS shows moderate hemispheric asymmetry due to subjects' handedness: a pilot study.

Authors:  Sebastian Schade; Vera Moliadze; Walter Paulus; Andrea Antal
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Antje Seeber; Kai Frommann; Cornelia Carmen Klein; Christian Rochford; Maren S Nitsche; Kristina Fricke; David Liebetanz; Nicolas Lang; Andrea Antal; Walter Paulus; Frithjof Tergau
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Updates on the use of non-invasive brain stimulation in physical and rehabilitation medicine.

Authors:  Julie A Williams; Marta Imamura; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex ameliorates chronic pain and reduces short intracortical inhibition.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Daniella Terney; Stefanie Kühnl; Walter Paulus
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.612

7.  Direct current stimulation promotes BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity: potential implications for motor learning.

Authors:  Brita Fritsch; Janine Reis; Keri Martinowich; Heidi M Schambra; Yuanyuan Ji; Leonardo G Cohen; Bai Lu
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans.

Authors:  M A Nitsche; W Paulus
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Modulation of LTP at rat hippocampal CA3-CA1 synapses by direct current stimulation.

Authors:  F Ranieri; M V Podda; E Riccardi; G Frisullo; M Dileone; P Profice; F Pilato; V Di Lazzaro; C Grassi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  A common polymorphism in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene (BDNF) modulates human cortical plasticity and the response to rTMS.

Authors:  Binith Cheeran; Penelope Talelli; Francesco Mori; Giacomo Koch; Antonio Suppa; Mark Edwards; Henry Houlden; Kailash Bhatia; Richard Greenwood; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  28 in total

1.  Local and remote effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the electrical activity of the motor cortical network.

Authors:  Francesca Notturno; Laura Marzetti; Vittorio Pizzella; Antonino Uncini; Filippo Zappasodi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Brain-derived neurotrophic factor: its impact upon neuroplasticity and neuroplasticity inducing transcranial brain stimulation protocols.

Authors:  L Chaieb; A Antal; G G Ambrus; W Paulus
Journal:  Neurogenetics       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.660

3.  Different cortical excitability profiles in hereditary brain iron and copper accumulation.

Authors:  Raffaele Dubbioso; Lucia Ruggiero; Marcello Esposito; Paola Tarantino; Marcello De Angelis; Francesco Aruta; Sabina Pappatà; Lorenzo Ugga; Alberto Piperno; Raffaele Iorio; Lucio Santoro; Rosa Iodice; Fiore Manganelli
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions.

Authors:  Jared Cooney Horvath; Simon J Vogrin; Olivia Carter; Mark J Cook; Jason D Forte
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effect of paired-pulse stimulus parameters on the two phases of short interval intracortical inhibition in the quadriceps muscle group.

Authors:  Chandramouli Krishnan
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.406

6.  Corticospinal excitability in the non-dominant hand is affected by BDNF genotype.

Authors:  Won Hyuk Chang; Jung Min Hwang; Kyeong Eun Uhm; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Yun-Hee Kim
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 7.  BDNF-based synaptic repair as a disease-modifying strategy for neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Bai Lu; Guhan Nagappan; Xiaoming Guan; Pradeep J Nathan; Paul Wren
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 8.  Electrifying the motor engram: effects of tDCS on motor learning and control.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Dual-tDCS Enhances Online Motor Skill Learning and Long-Term Retention in Chronic Stroke Patients.

Authors:  S Lefebvre; P Laloux; A Peeters; P Desfontaines; J Jamart; Y Vandermeeren
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Different current intensities of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation do not differentially modulate motor cortex plasticity.

Authors:  Dawson J Kidgell; Robin M Daly; Kayleigh Young; Jarrod Lum; Gregory Tooley; Shapour Jaberzadeh; Maryam Zoghi; Alan J Pearce
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 3.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.