Literature DB >> 22700163

Relative importance measures for reprioritization response shift.

Lisa M Lix1, Tolulope T Sajobi, Richard Sawatzky, Juxin Liu, Nancy E Mayo, Yuhui Huang, Lesley A Graff, John R Walker, Jason Ediger, Ian Clara, Kathryn Sexton, Rachel Carr, Charles N Bernstein.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Response shift (RS), a change in the meaning of an individual's self-evaluation of a target construct, such as health-related quality of life (HRQOL), can affect the interpretation of change in measures of the construct collected over time. This study proposes new statistical methods to test for reprioritization RS, in which the relative importance of HRQOL domains changes over time.
METHODS: The methods use descriptive discriminant analysis or logistic regression models and bootstrap inference to test for change in relative importance weights (method 1) or ranks (method 2) for discriminating between patient groups at two occasions. The methods are demonstrated using data from the Manitoba Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Cohort Study (n = 388). Reprioritization of domains from the IBD Questionnaire (IBDQ) and SF-36 was investigated for groups with active and inactive disease symptoms.
RESULTS: The IBDQ bowel symptoms and SF-36 bodily pain domains had the highest ranks for group discrimination. Using Method 1, there was evidence of reprioritization RS in the IBDQ social functioning domain and the SF-36 bodily pain and social functioning domains. Method 2 did not detect change for any of the domains.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to IBD patients without active disease symptoms, those with active symptoms were likely to change the meaning of their self-evaluations of pain and social interactions. Further research is needed to compare these new RS detection methods under a variety of data analytic conditions before recommendations about the optimal method can be made.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22700163     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-012-0198-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  28 in total

Review 1.  Methodological and statistical considerations for threats to internal validity in pediatric outcome data: response shift in self-report outcomes.

Authors:  Daniel F Brossart; Daniel L Clay; Victor L Willson
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb

2.  Interpreting Discriminant Functions: A Data Analytic Approach.

Authors:  D R Thomas
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1992-07-01       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Methods to detect response shift in quality of life data: a convergent validity study.

Authors:  Mechteld R M Visser; Frans J Oort; Mirjam A G Sprangers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  The inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire: a valid and reliable measure in ulcerative colitis patients in the North East of England.

Authors:  S W Han; E McColl; N Steen; J R Barton; M R Welfare
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  The contribution of individual variables to Hotelling's T2, Wilks' lambda, and R2.

Authors:  A C Rencher
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Evidence of disagreement between patient-perceived change and conventional longitudinal evaluation of change in health-related quality of life among older adults.

Authors:  Steven McPhail; Tracy Comans; Terry Haines
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 3.477

8.  Response shift in the assessment of quality of life among people attending cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  Martin Dempster; Rosa Carney; Roger McClements
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2009-07-13

9.  Response shift, recall bias and their effect on measuring change in health-related quality of life amongst older hospital patients.

Authors:  Steven McPhail; Terry Haines
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  The use of bootstrap methods for analysing Health-Related Quality of Life outcomes (particularly the SF-36).

Authors:  Stephen J Walters; Michael J Campbell
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  16 in total

1.  Guidelines for secondary analysis in search of response shift.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Sara Ahmed; Richard Sawatzky; Tolulope Sajobi; Nancy Mayo; Joel Finkelstein; Lisa Lix; Mathilde G E Verdam; Frans J Oort; Mirjam A G Sprangers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Method variation in the impact of missing data on response shift detection.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Tolulope T Sajobi; Mathilde G E Verdam; Veronique Sebille; Lisa M Lix; Alice Guilleux; Mirjam A G Sprangers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Identifying reprioritization response shift in a stroke caregiver population: a comparison of missing data methods.

Authors:  Tolulope T Sajobi; Lisa M Lix; Gurbakhshash Singh; Mark Lowerison; Jordan Engbers; Nancy E Mayo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Appraisal assessment in patient-reported outcome research: methods for uncovering the personal context and meaning of quality of life.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Joel A Finkelstein; Bruce D Rapkin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-12-17       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Scoping review of response shift methods: current reporting practices and recommendations.

Authors:  Tolulope T Sajobi; Ronak Brahmbatt; Lisa M Lix; Bruno D Zumbo; Richard Sawatzky
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  A systematic review of the quality of reporting of simulation studies about methods for the analysis of complex longitudinal patient-reported outcomes data.

Authors:  Aynslie M Hinds; Tolulope T Sajobi; Véronique Sebille; Richard Sawatzky; Lisa M Lix
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  If it's information, it's not "bias": a scoping review and proposed nomenclature for future response-shift research.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Gudrun Rohde; Elijah Biletch; Richard B B Stuart; I-Chan Huang; Joseph Lipscomb; Roland B Stark; Richard L Skolasky
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Changing values, changing outcomes: the influence of reprioritization response shift on outcome assessment after spine surgery.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Tolulope T Sajobi; Lisa M Lix; Brian R Quaranto; Joel A Finkelstein
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Evaluation of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system in a large cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases.

Authors:  Michael D Kappelman; Millie D Long; Christopher Martin; Darren A DeWalt; Patricia M Kinneer; Wenli Chen; James D Lewis; Robert S Sandler
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  Creating idiometric short-form measures of cognitive appraisal: balancing theory and pragmatics.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Roland B Stark; Bruce D Rapkin
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2021-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.