Literature DB >> 19594987

Response shift in the assessment of quality of life among people attending cardiac rehabilitation.

Martin Dempster1, Rosa Carney, Roger McClements.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether any response shift in quality of life (QoL) assessment over the course of a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programme could be explained by changes in individuals' internal standards (recalibration), values (reprioritization), and/or conceptualization of QoL and the extent to which any response shift could be explained by health locus of control, optimism, and coping strategy.
DESIGN: Longitudinal survey design.
METHODS: The schedule for evaluation of individual QoL-direct weighting (SEIQoL-DW) was administered at the beginning and end of a CR programme. At the end of the programme, the SEIQoL-DW then-test was also administered to measure response shift. A total of 57 participants completed these measures and other measures to assess health locus of control, optimism, and coping.
RESULTS: Response shift effects were observed in this population mainly due to recalibration. When response shift was incorporated into the analysis of QoL a larger treatment effect was observed. Active coping as a mechanism in the response shift model was found to have a significant positive correlation with response shift.
CONCLUSION: This study showed that response shift occurs during CR. The occurrence of response shift in QoL ratings over time for this population could have implications for the estimation of the effectiveness of the intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19594987     DOI: 10.1348/135910709X464443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Health Psychol        ISSN: 1359-107X


  6 in total

1.  Response shift effects in patients' assessments of their quality of life after cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  Michael Friedrich; Jan Karoff; Andreas Hinz
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Relative importance measures for reprioritization response shift.

Authors:  Lisa M Lix; Tolulope T Sajobi; Richard Sawatzky; Juxin Liu; Nancy E Mayo; Yuhui Huang; Lesley A Graff; John R Walker; Jason Ediger; Ian Clara; Kathryn Sexton; Rachel Carr; Charles N Bernstein
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Bias in retrospective assessment of perceived dental treatment effects when using the Oral Health Impact Profile.

Authors:  Daniel R Reissmann; Antje Erler; Christian Hirsch; Ira Sierwald; Carolina Machuca; Oliver Schierz
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Using the random forest method to detect a response shift in the quality of life of multiple sclerosis patients: a cohort study.

Authors:  Mohamed Boucekine; Anderson Loundou; Karine Baumstarck; Patricia Minaya-Flores; Jean Pelletier; Badih Ghattas; Pascal Auquier
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Agreement between the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life-Direct Weighting (SEIQoL-DW) interview and a paper-administered adaption.

Authors:  Marion Burckhardt; Steffen Fleischer; Almuth Berg
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Detection of response shift in health-related quality of life studies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Estelina Ortega-Gómez; Purificación Vicente-Galindo; Helena Martín-Rodero; Purificación Galindo-Villardón
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 3.186

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.