Literature DB >> 22695515

Assessment of annular distensibility in the aortic valve.

John O'Dea1, David J Nolan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES The recent introduction of transcatheter aortic heart valves into clinical practice has driven the need to develop methodologies to size such valves without access to the annulus in the manner hitherto possible with open heart surgery. To date, sizing has largely been done according to manufacturer-supplied guidelines based on transoesophageal echocardiography or multidetector computed tomography. We sought to examine how the diameter of the aortic valve annulus stretches under typical pressures encountered in normal and diseased states. In particular, we sought to measure how the area-derived diameter, Dcsa, i.e. the diameter derived from a cross-sectional area, varies with distending pressure. METHODS We conducted testing on 14 explanted pig hearts. Placing each heart in a 37 °C bath, an EndoFLIP EF-325 catheter (Crospon, Galway, Ireland) was introduced into the aortic valve transapically. The catheter allows intra-balloon pressure and up to 16 area-derived diameters to be measured simultaneously, thus permitting the shape of a lumen to be observed. By dividing the minimum area-derived diameter by distending pressure, a measure of distensibility (mm/mmHg) could be determined. Once the balloon was centred, balloon pressure was ramped between 100 and 200 mmHg, and the area-derived diameter was calculated at each pressure. RESULTS Between 100 and 200 mmHg, the mean (SD) increase in diameter was found to be 3.0 (1.5) mm. Distensibility in the different hearts ranged from 0 to 0.05 mm/mmHg. In some cases, the diameter change over the pressure range was negligible, whereas in one case, the diameter change over the range was 5 mm. Whereas different nominal values of diameter are to be expected, a significant variation in the degree of distensibility was observed. CONCLUSIONS Distensibility of the aortic valve annulus is highly variable. Measurement of this parameter in addition to nominal annulus diameter may suggest occasions where a larger transcatheter aortic-valve implantation valve than would be suggested by annulus diameter measurement alone, could be deployed safely with an objective of reducing regurgitation where the annulus is sufficiently distensible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22695515      PMCID: PMC3422965          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivs273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  7 in total

1.  Aortic annulus diameter determination by multidetector computed tomography: reproducibility, applicability, and implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Ronen Gurvitch; John G Webb; Ren Yuan; Mark Johnson; Cameron Hague; Alexander B Willson; Stefan Toggweiler; David A Wood; Jian Ye; Robert Moss; Christopher R Thompson; Stephan Achenbach; James K Min; Troy M Labounty; Ricardo Cury; Jonathon Leipsic
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 11.195

2.  Optimizing transcatheter aortic valve sizing and minimizing vascular complications.

Authors:  Carlos E Ruiz
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Deformation dynamics and mechanical properties of the aortic annulus by 4-dimensional computed tomography: insights into the functional anatomy of the aortic valve complex and implications for transcatheter aortic valve therapy.

Authors:  Ashraf Hamdan; Victor Guetta; Eli Konen; Orly Goitein; Amit Segev; Ehud Raanani; Dan Spiegelstein; Ilan Hay; Elio Di Segni; Michael Eldar; Ehud Schwammenthal
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Cross-sectional computed tomographic assessment improves accuracy of aortic annular sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement and reduces the incidence of paravalvular aortic regurgitation.

Authors:  Hasan Jilaihawi; Mohammad Kashif; Gregory Fontana; Azusa Furugen; Takahiro Shiota; Gerald Friede; Rakhee Makhija; Niraj Doctor; Martin B Leon; Raj R Makkar
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Aortic root distensibility and cross-sectional areas in stented and subcoronary stentless bioprostheses in pigs.

Authors:  Jonas Amstrup Funder; Steffen Ringgaard; Markus Winther Frost; Per Wierup; Kaj-Erik Klaaborg; Vibeke Hjortdal; Hans Nygaard; John Michael Hasenkam
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-03-31

6.  A comparison of balloon- and self-expanding stents.

Authors: 
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.442

7.  Three dimensional evaluation of the aortic annulus using multislice computer tomography: are manufacturer's guidelines for sizing for percutaneous aortic valve replacement helpful?

Authors:  Carl J Schultz; Adriaan Moelker; Nicolo Piazza; Apostolos Tzikas; Amber Otten; Rutger J Nuis; Lisan A Neefjes; Robert J van Geuns; Pim de Feyter; Gabriel Krestin; Patrick W Serruys; Peter P T de Jaegere
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 29.983

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Can finite element models of ballooning procedures yield mechanical response of the cardiovascular site to overexpansion?

Authors:  Giorgia M Bosi; Benedetta Biffi; Giovanni Biglino; Valentina Lintas; Rod Jones; Spyros Tzamtzis; Gaetano Burriesci; Francesco Migliavacca; Sachin Khambadkone; Andrew M Taylor; Silvia Schievano
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Population-specific material properties of the implantation site for transcatheter aortic valve replacement finite element simulations.

Authors:  Giorgia M Bosi; Claudio Capelli; Mun Hong Cheang; Nicola Delahunty; Michael Mullen; Andrew M Taylor; Silvia Schievano
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.712

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.