Literature DB >> 479921

Forward masking of auditory nerve fiber responses.

D M Harris, P Dallos.   

Abstract

1. Responses of single fibers were obtained from the auditory nerve of chinchillas. Tone-burst stimuli consisted of a masking stimulus followed by a probe stimulus. Forward masking of a fiber's response is defined as a reduction in the magnitude of the probe-evoked response caused by the addition of the masking stimulus. 2. The recovery of probe response magnitude as a function of the time interval between masker offset and probe onset (delta T) follows an exponential time course. A relationship between the time course or magnitude of poststimulus recovery and the characteristic frequency (CF) of a fiber was not detected. 3. The iso-forward masking contour near the threshold of the masking effect across masker frequencies approximates a fiber's frequency threshold curve (FTC). In other words, forward masking tuning curves are essentially the same as frequency threshold curves. 4. The frequency dependence of forward masking is compared to that of two-tone suppression. Tonal stimuli outside the boundaries of a fiber's FTC that produce two-tone suppression are ineffective forward maskers. Certain frequency/intensity combinations within the FTC may produce both suppression and forward masking and tones within the remaining area of the FTC produce no suppression but are effective forward maskers. 5. Both the time course and the magnitude of the forward masking effect are dependent on the discharge rate evoked by the masker regardless of the masker's absolute level or spectral content. An increase in masker-evoked excitation causes an increase in time constant and a greater reduction in probe response magnitude, rd. The function relating rd to masker level parallels the firing rate/masker level function up to 40 dB above response threshold. 6. A decrease in masker duration from 100 ms leads to a decrease in both rd and the time constant of recovery. There is no significant difference between the 100 and 200 ms duration conditions. 7. Forward masking in single fibers is related to the period of poststimulus recovery of spontaneous activity, a component of a fiber's response pattern to the masker, and this component is tentatively identified as a period of recovery from short-term adaptation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 479921     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1979.42.4.1083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  92 in total

1.  Properties of derived cochlear action potentials in forward tonal masking in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Y A Al'tman; N I Nikitin
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct

2.  Neural correlates of an auditory afterimage in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  A J Noreña; J J Eggermont
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-09

3.  Time course of dynamic range adaptation in the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Bo Wen; Grace I Wang; Isabel Dean; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Young infants' perception of liquid coarticulatory influences on following stop consonants.

Authors:  C A Fowler; C T Best; G W McRoberts
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-12

5.  Level-tuned neurons in primary auditory cortex adapt differently to loud versus soft sounds.

Authors:  Paul V Watkins; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  A psychoacoustic method to find the perceptual cues of stop consonants in natural speech.

Authors:  Feipeng Li; Anjali Menon; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Isoresponse versus isoinput estimates of cochlear filter tuning.

Authors:  Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-23

8.  Disruption of adaptor protein 2μ (AP-2μ) in cochlear hair cells impairs vesicle reloading of synaptic release sites and hearing.

Authors:  SangYong Jung; Tanja Maritzen; Carolin Wichmann; Zhizi Jing; Andreas Neef; Natalia H Revelo; Hanan Al-Moyed; Sandra Meese; Sonja M Wojcik; Iliana Panou; Haydar Bulut; Peter Schu; Ralf Ficner; Ellen Reisinger; Silvio O Rizzoli; Jakob Neef; Nicola Strenzke; Volker Haucke; Tobias Moser
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Spike timing precision changes with spike rate adaptation in the owl's auditory space map.

Authors:  Clifford H Keller; Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Diverse effects of stimulus history in waking mouse auditory cortex.

Authors:  Elizabeth A K Phillips; Christoph E Schreiner; Andrea R Hasenstaub
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.