Literature DB >> 22692557

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumber interbody fusion and degenerative lumbar spine disease.

Antonio Tsahtsarlis1, Martin Wood.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) surgery for degenerative lumbar spine disease.
METHODS: A prospective analysis of 34 consecutive patients who underwent a MI-TLIF using image guidance between July 2008 and November 2010. The patient group comprised 19 males and 15 females (mean age 56), 23 of whom had undergone additional reduction of spondylolisthesis. All patients underwent post-operative CT imaging to assess pedicle screw, cage placement and fusion at 6 months. Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were recorded pre-operatively and at 6-month follow up.
RESULTS: 33/34 (97.1%) patients showed evidence of fusion at 6 months with a mean improvement of 27 on ODI scores. The mean length of hospital stay was 4 days. The mean operative time was 173 min. COMPLICATIONS OBSERVED: 1/34 (2.9%) suffered a pulmonary embolism and 1/34 (2.9%) patients developed transient nerve root pain post-operatively. There were no occurrences of infection and no post-operative CSF leaks.
CONCLUSION: MI-TLIF offers patients a safe and effective surgical treatment option to treat degenerative lumbar spine disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22692557      PMCID: PMC3481093          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2376-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  25 in total

1.  Advances in minimally invasive spine surgery.

Authors:  Kevin T Foley; Michael A Lefkowitz
Journal:  Clin Neurosurg       Date:  2002

Review 2.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Isaac O Karikari; Robert E Isaacs
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation.

Authors:  Robert E Isaacs; Vinod K Podichetty; Paul Santiago; Faheem A Sandhu; John Spears; Kevin Kelly; Laurie Rice; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2005-08

4.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience.

Authors:  Constantin Schizas; Nicolas Tzinieris; Elefterios Tsiridis; Victor Kosmopoulos
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using unilateral pedicle screws and a translaminar screw.

Authors:  Anil Sethi; Sandra Lee; Rahul Vaidya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  The lumbar multifidus muscle five years after surgery for a lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.

Authors:  J Rantanen; M Hurme; B Falck; H Alaranta; F Nykvist; M Lehto; S Einola; H Kalimo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery.

Authors:  R Gejo; H Matsui; Y Kawaguchi; H Ishihara; H Tsuji
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Yue Zhou; Zheng Feng Zhang; Chang Qing Li; Wen Jie Zheng; Jie Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results.

Authors:  James D Schwender; Langston T Holly; David P Rouben; Kevin T Foley
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2005-02

10.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Chan Wearn Benedict Peng; Wai Mun Yue; Seng Yew Poh; William Yeo; Seang Beng Tan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  18 in total

1.  Comparative outcomes between collared versus collarless and short versus long stem of direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and indirect meta-analysis.

Authors:  Phonthakorn Panichkul; Suthorn Bavonratanavech; Alisara Arirachakaran; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-07-30

Review 2.  Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gun Keorochana; Kitipong Setrkraising; Patarawan Woratanarat; Alisara Arirachakaran; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 3.  Learning curve for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yong Ahn; Sol Lee; Woo-Kyung Kim; Sang-Gu Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 2.721

4.  Microendoscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: short-term and medium-term outcomes.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Bin Liu; Li-Min Rong; Rui-Qiang Chen; Jian-Wen Dong; Pei-Gen Xie; Liang-Ming Zhang; Feng Feng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

5.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence.

Authors:  Nai-Feng Tian; Yao-Sen Wu; Xiao-Lei Zhang; Hua-Zi Xu; Yong-Long Chi; Fang-Min Mao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Liang Wang; Yipeng Wang; Zhengyao Li; Bin Yu; Ye Li
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Comparison between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Conventional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lei Xie; Wen-Jian Wu; Yu Liang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 8.  Minimally Invasive Versus Open Laminectomy/Discectomy, Transforaminal Lumbar, and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusions: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Allicia O Imada; Tridu R Huynh; Doniel Drazin
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-07-18

9.  Incidence and management of cerebrospinal fluid fistulas in 336 multilevel laminectomies with noninstrumented fusions.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-10-08

10.  Finite Element Analysis of a New Pedicle Screw-Plate System for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Jie Li; Jin Shang; Yue Zhou; Changqing Li; Huan Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.