Literature DB >> 36178548

Learning curve for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review.

Yong Ahn1, Sol Lee2, Woo-Kyung Kim3, Sang-Gu Lee3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) is commonly used to treat degenerative lumbar spinal disorders. It facilitates a full-scale spinal decompression and interbody fusion with minimal neural retraction using the tubular retractor system. Despite the benefits of surgical efficiency and minimalism, this technique requires a long learning curve. There is currently no consensus on the learning curve characteristics and proper training methods for MI-TLIF. Thus, this systematic review aimed to discuss the cutoff point at which technical proficiency is achieved and ways to enhance the learning process.
METHODS: Major databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, were searched for learning curve studies that have evaluated the clinical outcome and learning progress of MI-TLIF using quantitative data. The qualities of the selected studies were assessed using the Newcastle‒Ottawa scale. The plateau points in the "learning curve" were analyzed according to various outcome measures.
RESULTS: Nine full-text articles, representing 753 cases, were included from 9743 screened studies. The most commonly used outcome measures were the operative time, followed by the complication rate. The mean cutoff point for the operative time was 31.33 ± 11.98 (range 13‒45) cases.
CONCLUSION: The plateau point in the learning curve for MI-TLIF may differ according to the outcome measures used. Most studies have demonstrated the learning progress based on simple task efficiency, rather than patient outcomes. Moreover, the learning rate may be affected by the patients' and technical conditions. Therefore, great care is required in interpreting the learning curve and cutoff point for MI-TLIF proficiency.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Interbody fusion; Learning curve; Lumbar; Minimally invasive; Transforaminal

Year:  2022        PMID: 36178548     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07397-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   2.721


  28 in total

1.  Advances in minimally invasive spine surgery.

Authors:  Kevin T Foley; Michael A Lefkowitz
Journal:  Clin Neurosurg       Date:  2002

2.  Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.

Authors:  David Rouben; Michael Casnellie; Michael Ferguson
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2011-07

3.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience.

Authors:  Constantin Schizas; Nicolas Tzinieris; Elefterios Tsiridis; Victor Kosmopoulos
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Complications and perioperative factors associated with learning the technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

Authors:  Darryl Lau; Jasmine G Lee; Seunggu J Han; Daniel C Lu; Dean Chou
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 5.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Prashanth J Rao; Andrew C Kam; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  [A one-stager procedure in operative treatment of spondylolistheses: dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion (author's transl)].

Authors:  J Harms; H Rolinger
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1982 May-Jun

7.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumber interbody fusion and degenerative lumbar spine disease.

Authors:  Antonio Tsahtsarlis; Martin Wood
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Sanjay S Dhall; Michael Y Wang; Praveen V Mummaneni
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2008-12

9.  Percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar instability.

Authors:  Kai-Michael Scheufler; Hildegard Dohmen; Vassilios I Vougioukas
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Minimally invasive versus traditional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Rongqing Qin; Tong Wu; Hongpeng Liu; Bing Zhou; Pin Zhou; Xing Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.