PURPOSE: Pulmonary edema (PE) is associated with fluid accumulation in the lungs. Device-based impedance measurements have been used to detect fluid overload prior to hospitalization. However, studies have reported a high false positive rate (FPR). The objective of this study was to develop and test a new multivector impedance-based algorithm that reliably tracks PE clinical events. METHODS: We enrolled patients with implanted CRT-Ds in 23 US centers within 2 weeks of device implant. Six-vector impedance data was collected automatically by the CRT-Ds every 30 min during emergency department visits/hospitalizations and every 2 h at all other times. Detection algorithms for cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) and implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) devices were developed using those impedance vectors that would be available in corresponding devices and retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: There were 75 patients (69 % male), mean age 66 ± 12 years, with a LVEF of 23 ± 6 % and QRS of 149 ± 25 ms. Twenty-one major clinical events occurred over 8.2 ± 2.6 months of follow-up time. CRT-D vector combinations resulted in a sensitivity of 71.4 % (95 % confidence interval 47.8-88.7) and a FPR of 0.56 (0.30-0.94) false positives per patient-year (FPs/pt-yr); ICD vector combinations resulted in a sensitivity of 61.9 % (38.4-81.9) and a FPR of 0.63 (0.36-0.90) FPs/pt-yr. In comparison, the single-vector RVCoil-Can implementation of this algorithm resulted in a sensitivity of 57.1 % (34.0-78.2) and a FPR of 0.74 (0.44-1.12) FPs/pt-yr. CONCLUSIONS: This multivector impedance algorithm was effective in tracking PE clinical events in this patient population. Additional studies are needed to prospectively evaluate the performance of this algorithm in a larger population.
PURPOSE:Pulmonary edema (PE) is associated with fluid accumulation in the lungs. Device-based impedance measurements have been used to detect fluid overload prior to hospitalization. However, studies have reported a high false positive rate (FPR). The objective of this study was to develop and test a new multivector impedance-based algorithm that reliably tracks PE clinical events. METHODS: We enrolled patients with implanted CRT-Ds in 23 US centers within 2 weeks of device implant. Six-vector impedance data was collected automatically by the CRT-Ds every 30 min during emergency department visits/hospitalizations and every 2 h at all other times. Detection algorithms for cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) and implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) devices were developed using those impedance vectors that would be available in corresponding devices and retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: There were 75 patients (69 % male), mean age 66 ± 12 years, with a LVEF of 23 ± 6 % and QRS of 149 ± 25 ms. Twenty-one major clinical events occurred over 8.2 ± 2.6 months of follow-up time. CRT-D vector combinations resulted in a sensitivity of 71.4 % (95 % confidence interval 47.8-88.7) and a FPR of 0.56 (0.30-0.94) false positives per patient-year (FPs/pt-yr); ICD vector combinations resulted in a sensitivity of 61.9 % (38.4-81.9) and a FPR of 0.63 (0.36-0.90) FPs/pt-yr. In comparison, the single-vector RVCoil-Can implementation of this algorithm resulted in a sensitivity of 57.1 % (34.0-78.2) and a FPR of 0.74 (0.44-1.12) FPs/pt-yr. CONCLUSIONS: This multivector impedance algorithm was effective in tracking PE clinical events in this patient population. Additional studies are needed to prospectively evaluate the performance of this algorithm in a larger population.
Authors: Jay Ritzema; Richard Troughton; Iain Melton; Ian Crozier; Robert Doughty; Henry Krum; Anthony Walton; Philip Adamson; Saibal Kar; Prediman K Shah; Mark Richards; Neal L Eigler; James S Whiting; Garrie J Haas; J Thomas Heywood; Christopher M Frampton; William T Abraham Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-02-22 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Claudia Ypenburg; Jeroen J Bax; Ernst E van der Wall; Martin J Schalij; Lieselot van Erven Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2007-01-02 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: William T Abraham; Steven Compton; Garrie Haas; Blair Foreman; Robert C Canby; Robert Fishel; Scott McRae; Gloria B Toledo; Shantanu Sarkar; Douglas A Hettrick Journal: Congest Heart Fail Date: 2011-03-21
Authors: William T Abraham; Philip B Adamson; Robert C Bourge; Mark F Aaron; Maria Rosa Costanzo; Lynne W Stevenson; Warren Strickland; Suresh Neelagaru; Nirav Raval; Steven Krueger; Stanislav Weiner; David Shavelle; Bradley Jeffries; Jay S Yadav Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-02-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Dirk Vollmann; Herbert Nägele; Patrick Schauerte; Uwe Wiegand; Christian Butter; Gabriele Zanotto; Aurelio Quesada; Axel Guthmann; Michael R S Hill; Barbara Lamp Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2007-02-19 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Joseph S Ross; Jersey Chen; Zhenqiu Lin; Héctor Bueno; Jeptha P Curtis; Patricia S Keenan; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Geoffrey Schreiner; John A Spertus; Maria T Vidán; Yongfei Wang; Yun Wang; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2009-11-10 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Christopher J Charles; Miriam T Rademaker; Iain C Melton; Dan Gutfinger; Neal L Eigler; Fujian Qu; Richard W Troughton Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: Barbara A Lara; Fujian Qu; E Kevin Heist; Behzad B Pavri; Adrian B Van Bakel; John M Herre; Philip F Binkley Journal: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Date: 2015-05-15