Literature DB >> 22682245

The intra-S phase checkpoint targets Dna2 to prevent stalled replication forks from reversing.

Jiazhi Hu1, Lei Sun, Fenfen Shen, Yufei Chen, Yu Hua, Yang Liu, Mian Zhang, Yiren Hu, Qingsong Wang, Wei Xu, Fei Sun, Jianguo Ji, Johanne M Murray, Antony M Carr, Daochun Kong.   

Abstract

When replication forks stall at damaged bases or upon nucleotide depletion, the intra-S phase checkpoint ensures they are stabilized and can restart. In intra-S checkpoint-deficient budding yeast, stalling forks collapse, and ∼10% form pathogenic chicken foot structures, contributing to incomplete replication and cell death (Lopes et al., 2001; Sogo et al., 2002; Tercero and Diffley, 2001). Using fission yeast, we report that the Cds1(Chk2) effector kinase targets Dna2 on S220 to regulate, both in vivo and in vitro, Dna2 association with stalled replication forks in chromatin. We demonstrate that Dna2-S220 phosphorylation and the nuclease activity of Dna2 are required to prevent fork reversal. Consistent with this, Dna2 can efficiently cleave obligate precursors of fork regression-regressed leading or lagging strands-on model replication forks. We propose that Dna2 cleavage of regressed nascent strands prevents fork reversal and thus stabilizes stalled forks to maintain genome stability during replication stress.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22682245     DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell        ISSN: 0092-8674            Impact factor:   41.582


  92 in total

Review 1.  A tough row to hoe: when replication forks encounter DNA damage.

Authors:  Darshil R Patel; Robert S Weiss
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 5.407

Review 2.  DNA replication stress: from molecular mechanisms to human disease.

Authors:  Sergio Muñoz; Juan Méndez
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Redox Chemistry in the Genome: Emergence of the [4Fe4S] Cofactor in Repair and Replication.

Authors:  Jacqueline K Barton; Rebekah M B Silva; Elizabeth O'Brien
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 23.643

4.  Direct Visualization of RNA-DNA Primer Removal from Okazaki Fragments Provides Support for Flap Cleavage and Exonucleolytic Pathways in Eukaryotic Cells.

Authors:  Bochao Liu; Jiazhi Hu; Jingna Wang; Daochun Kong
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Rad9/53BP1 protects stalled replication forks from degradation in Mec1/ATR-defective cells.

Authors:  Matteo Villa; Diego Bonetti; Massimo Carraro; Maria Pia Longhese
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 6.  Replication fork reversal in eukaryotes: from dead end to dynamic response.

Authors:  Kai J Neelsen; Massimo Lopes
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 94.444

7.  Competing interaction partners modulate the activity of Sgs1 helicase during DNA end resection.

Authors:  Kristina Kasaciunaite; Fergus Fettes; Maryna Levikova; Peter Daldrop; Roopesh Anand; Petr Cejka; Ralf Seidel
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Replication fork stalling elicits chromatin compaction for the stability of stalling replication forks.

Authors:  Gang Feng; Yue Yuan; Zeyang Li; Lu Wang; Bo Zhang; Jiechen Luo; Jianguo Ji; Daochun Kong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Replication fork regression and its regulation.

Authors:  Xiangzhou Meng; Xiaolan Zhao
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Cdc24 Is Essential for Long-range End Resection in the Repair of Double-stranded DNA Breaks.

Authors:  Huimin Zhang; Yu Hua; Rui Li; Daochun Kong
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.