Literature DB >> 25714681

Replication fork reversal in eukaryotes: from dead end to dynamic response.

Kai J Neelsen1, Massimo Lopes2.   

Abstract

The remodelling of replication forks into four-way junctions following replication perturbation, known as fork reversal, was hypothesized to promote DNA damage tolerance and repair during replication. Albeit conceptually attractive, for a long time fork reversal in vivo was found only in prokaryotes and specific yeast mutants, calling its evolutionary conservation and physiological relevance into question. Based on the recent visualization of replication forks in metazoans, fork reversal has emerged as a global, reversible and regulated process, with intriguing implications for replication completion, chromosome integrity and the DNA damage response. The study of the putative in vivo roles of recently identified eukaryotic factors in fork remodelling promises to shed new light on mechanisms of genome maintenance and to provide novel attractive targets for cancer therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25714681     DOI: 10.1038/nrm3935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 1471-0072            Impact factor:   94.444


  141 in total

Review 1.  Preventing replication stress to maintain genome stability: resolving conflicts between replication and transcription.

Authors:  Rodrigo Bermejo; Mong Sing Lai; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 2.  The FANCM family of DNA helicases/translocases.

Authors:  Matthew C Whitby
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2010-02-08

Review 3.  PARP inhibition: PARP1 and beyond.

Authors:  Michèle Rouleau; Anand Patel; Michael J Hendzel; Scott H Kaufmann; Guy G Poirier
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Polyubiquitinated PCNA recruits the ZRANB3 translocase to maintain genomic integrity after replication stress.

Authors:  Alberto Ciccia; Amitabh V Nimonkar; Yiduo Hu; Ildiko Hajdu; Yathish Jagadheesh Achar; Lior Izhar; Sarah A Petit; Britt Adamson; John C Yoon; Stephen C Kowalczykowski; David M Livingston; Lajos Haracska; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Substrate-selective repair and restart of replication forks by DNA translocases.

Authors:  Rémy Bétous; Frank B Couch; Aaron C Mason; Brandt F Eichman; Maria Manosas; David Cortez
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 6.  Role of yeast Rad5 and its human orthologs, HLTF and SHPRH in DNA damage tolerance.

Authors:  Ildiko Unk; Ildikó Hajdú; András Blastyák; Lajos Haracska
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2010-01-21

7.  The WRN and MUS81 proteins limit cell death and genome instability following oncogene activation.

Authors:  I Murfuni; S Nicolai; S Baldari; M Crescenzi; M Bignami; A Franchitto; P Pichierri
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Phosphorylation of a C-terminal auto-inhibitory domain increases SMARCAL1 activity.

Authors:  Clinton Carroll; Carol E Bansbach; Runxiang Zhao; Sung Yun Jung; Jun Qin; David Cortez
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Single-molecule sorting reveals how ubiquitylation affects substrate recognition and activities of FBH1 helicase.

Authors:  Tokiha Masuda-Ozawa; Trish Hoang; Yeon-Soo Seo; Lin-Feng Chen; Maria Spies
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 10.  Replication fork reversal and the maintenance of genome stability.

Authors:  John Atkinson; Peter McGlynn
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  201 in total

Review 1.  A tough row to hoe: when replication forks encounter DNA damage.

Authors:  Darshil R Patel; Robert S Weiss
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 5.407

Review 2.  DNA replication stress: from molecular mechanisms to human disease.

Authors:  Sergio Muñoz; Juan Méndez
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Mycobacterium tuberculosis RecG protein but not RuvAB or RecA protein is efficient at remodeling the stalled replication forks: implications for multiple mechanisms of replication restart in mycobacteria.

Authors:  Roshan Singh Thakur; Shivakumar Basavaraju; Jasbeer Singh Khanduja; K Muniyappa; Ganesh Nagaraju
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Tel1/ATM prevents degradation of replication forks that reverse after topoisomerase poisoning.

Authors:  Luca Menin; Sebastian Ursich; Camilla Trovesi; Ralph Zellweger; Massimo Lopes; Maria Pia Longhese; Michela Clerici
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 5.  The MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 Complex Conducts the Orchestration of Damage Signaling and Outcomes to Stress in DNA Replication and Repair.

Authors:  Aleem Syed; John A Tainer
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 6.  Replication-Coupled DNA Repair.

Authors:  David Cortez
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 7.  Rescuing Replication from Barriers: Mechanistic Insights from Single-Molecule Studies.

Authors:  Bo Sun
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 8.  Replication fork regression and its regulation.

Authors:  Xiangzhou Meng; Xiaolan Zhao
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Neutrophil-induced genomic instability impedes resolution of inflammation and wound healing.

Authors:  Veronika Butin-Israeli; Triet M Bui; Hannah L Wiesolek; Lorraine Mascarenhas; Joseph J Lee; Lindsey C Mehl; Kaitlyn R Knutson; Stephen A Adam; Robert D Goldman; Arthur Beyder; Lisa Wiesmuller; Stephen B Hanauer; Ronen Sumagin
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Genetic and biochemical evidences reveal novel insights into the mechanism underlying Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2-mediated abrogation of DNA replication stress.

Authors:  Indrajeet Ghodke; K Muniyappa
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.826

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.