Literature DB >> 22680230

Relationship between baseline impedance levels and esophageal mucosal integrity in children with erosive and non-erosive reflux disease.

O Borrelli1, S Salvatore, V Mancini, M Ribolsi, M Gentile, B Bizzarri, M Cicala, K J Lindley, G L De'angelis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Baseline impedance measurement has been reported to be related to esophageal acid exposure and hypothesized to be a marker of microscopic changes of the esophageal mucosa. Aims of the study were to establish whether any relationship existed between the magnitude of intercellular space diameter (ISD) of esophageal mucosa and baseline impedance levels in children with gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), and to compare baseline impedance levels between children with non erosive (NERD) and erosive (ERD) reflux disease.
METHODS: Fifteen children (median age: 11.2 years) with NERD, and 11 with ERD (median age: 9.6 years) were prospectively studied. All patients underwent upper endoscopy. Biopsies were taken 2-3cm above the Z-line, and ISD was measured using transmission electron microscopy. All patients underwent impedance pH-monitoring, and baseline impedance levels were assessed in the most distal impedance channel. KEY
RESULTS: Mean (±SD) ISD did not differ between NERD (1.0±0.3μm) and ERD (1.1 ± 0.3 μm, ns). Considering all patients together, no correlation was found between distal baseline impedance and ISD (r: -0.15; ns). Conversely, negative correlations were found between distal baseline impedance and acid exposure time (r: -0.76; P<0.001), long-lasting reflux episodes (r: -0.78; P<0.001), acid reflux episodes (r: -0.62; P<0.001), and acid clearance time (r: -0.79; P<0.001). Distal baseline impedance was significantly lower in ERD [1455 (947-2338) Ω] than in NERD children [3065 (2253-3771) Ω; P<0.01]. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: In children with GERD baseline impedance levels are not useful in predicting reflux-induced ultrastructural changes in the esophageal mucosa, despite their ability to discriminate between NERD and ERD.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22680230     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.01947.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  12 in total

Review 1.  Adult and paediatric GERD: diagnosis, phenotypes and avoidance of excess treatments.

Authors:  Kornilia Nikaki; Philip Woodland; Daniel Sifrim
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 2.  BSPGHAN Motility Working Group position statement: paediatric multichannel intraluminal pH impedance monitoring-indications, methods and interpretation.

Authors:  Mohamed Mutalib; David Rawat; Keith Lindley; Osvaldo Borrelli; Steve Perring; Marcus K H Auth; Nikhil Thapar
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03-15

3.  Acid and bolus exposure in pediatric reflux disease according to the presence and severity of esophageal mucosal lesions.

Authors:  Takeshi Saito; Masaya Uesato; Keita Terui; Mitsuyuki Nakata; Shugo Komatsu; Hideo Yoshida
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  The diagnostic value of 24-hour ambulatory intraesophageal pH-impedance in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms comparable with typical symptoms.

Authors:  Yusuf S Sakin; Rukiye Vardar; Baha Sezgin; Zeynep Erdogan Cetin; Yasemin Alev; Esra Yildirim; Tayfun Kirazli; Serhat Bor
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.623

5.  Esophageal Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance and pH Monitoring in the Evaluation of Achalasia and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in a Child with Down Syndrome: a Case Report.

Authors:  Mihai-Mirel Stoicescu; Mihai Mocanu; Felicia Galos; Mihai Munteanu; Simina Visan; Coriolan Ulmeanu; Mihaela Balgradean
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2014-12

6.  Correlation between hypersensitivity induced by esophageal acid infusion and the baseline impedance level in patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  A Young Seo; Cheol Min Shin; Nayoung Kim; Hyuk Yoon; Young Soo Park; Dong Ho Lee
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 7.527

7.  Impact of esophageal mucosal permeability markers on provocation-induced esophageal reflexes in high-risk infants.

Authors:  Sudarshan R Jadcherla; Roseanna Helmick; Kathryn A Hasenstab; Minna Njeh; Enas Alshaikh
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2022-06

8.  Mucosal Impedance Measurements Differentiate Pediatric Patients With Active Versus Inactive Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Authors:  Mary Allyson Lowry; Michael F Vaezi; Hernan Correa; Tina Higginbotham; James C Slaughter; Sari Acra
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.839

9.  Multichannel impedance monitoring for distinguishing nonerosive reflux esophagitis with minor changes on endoscopy in children.

Authors:  Fujino Junko; David Moore; Taher Omari; Grace Seiboth; Rammy Abu-Assi; Paul Hammond; Richard Couper
Journal:  Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2021-07-15

10.  Esophageal Baseline Impedance Reflects Mucosal Integrity and Predicts Symptomatic Outcome With Proton Pump Inhibitor Treatment.

Authors:  Chenxi Xie; Daniel Sifrim; Yuwen Li; Minhu Chen; Yinglian Xiao
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.