Literature DB >> 29543695

Mucosal Impedance Measurements Differentiate Pediatric Patients With Active Versus Inactive Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Mary Allyson Lowry1, Michael F Vaezi2, Hernan Correa3, Tina Higginbotham2, James C Slaughter4, Sari Acra1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic disorder in children that requires continued assessment of disease activity, involving repeated sedation, endoscopy, and biopsy analysis. We investigated whether mucosal impedance measurements can be used to monitor disease activity in pediatric patients with EoE.
METHODS: We measured mucosal impedance at 3 locations in the esophagus in pediatric patients (1-18 years old; 32 with active EoE, 10 with inactive EoE, 32 with nonerosive reflux disease [NERD]) and 53 children with symptoms but normal findings from histologic analyses (controls) undergoing routine esophagogastroduodenoscopy at the Vanderbilt Pediatric Gastroenterology Clinic. Pathologists reviewed biopsies per routine protocol, determined eosinophilic density, and graded spongiosis on an ordinal visual scale. Mucosal impedance measurements were compared within patient groups. The primary outcome was correlation of mucosal impedance measurements with disease activity, based on severity of spongiosis and eosinophil counts.
RESULTS: Mucosal impedance measurements were significantly lower in patients with active EoE at 2, 5, and 10 cm above the squamo-columnar junction (median values of 1069, 1368, and 1707, respectively) compared to patients with inactive EoE (median values of 3663, 3657, and 4494, respectively), NERD (median values of 2754, 3243, and 4387), and controls (median values of 3091, 3760, and 4509) (P < 0.001 for all comparisons to patients with active EoE). We found inverse correlations between mucosal impedance measurements and eosinophil count (P < 0.001), and spongiosis severity (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Mucosal impedance measurements may provide immediate information about mucosal inflammation in children. Patients with active EoE have significantly lower mucosal impedance values than patients with inactive EoE, NERD, or controls; mucosal impedance measurements correlate inversely with eosinophil counts and spongiosis severity. Mucosal impedance is a promising rapid and less-invasive method to monitor EoE activity in pediatric patients with EoE; it could reduce costs and risks of disease monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29543695      PMCID: PMC6060000          DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr        ISSN: 0277-2116            Impact factor:   2.839


  18 in total

1.  Eosinophilic esophagitis.

Authors:  Richard J Noel; Philip E Putnam; Marc E Rothenberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Delay in diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis increases risk for stricture formation in a time-dependent manner.

Authors:  Alain M Schoepfer; Ekaterina Safroneeva; Christian Bussmann; Tanja Kuchen; Susanne Portmann; Hans-Uwe Simon; Alex Straumann
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Neurodevelopment of children exposed to anesthesia: design of the Mayo Anesthesia Safety in Kids (MASK) study.

Authors:  Stephen J Gleich; Randall Flick; Danqing Hu; Michael J Zaccariello; Robert C Colligan; Slavica K Katusic; Darrell R Schroeder; Andrew Hanson; Shonie Buenvenida; Robert T Wilder; Juraj Sprung; Robert G Voigt; Merle G Paule; John J Chelonis; David O Warner
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 4.  Eosinophilic esophagitis: updated consensus recommendations for children and adults.

Authors:  Chris A Liacouras; Glenn T Furuta; Ikuo Hirano; Dan Atkins; Stephen E Attwood; Peter A Bonis; A Wesley Burks; Mirna Chehade; Margaret H Collins; Evan S Dellon; Ranjan Dohil; Gary W Falk; Nirmala Gonsalves; Sandeep K Gupta; David A Katzka; Alfredo J Lucendo; Jonathan E Markowitz; Richard J Noel; Robert D Odze; Philip E Putnam; Joel E Richter; Yvonne Romero; Eduardo Ruchelli; Hugh A Sampson; Alain Schoepfer; Nicholas J Shaheen; Scott H Sicherer; Stuart Spechler; Jonathan M Spergel; Alex Straumann; Barry K Wershil; Marc E Rothenberg; Seema S Aceves
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 10.793

5.  Dissociation between symptoms and histological severity in pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis.

Authors:  Scott Pentiuk; Phillip E Putnam; Margaret H Collins; Marc E Rothenberg
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.839

6.  Early exposure to anesthesia and learning disabilities in a population-based birth cohort.

Authors:  Robert T Wilder; Randall P Flick; Juraj Sprung; Slavica K Katusic; William J Barbaresi; Christopher Mickelson; Stephen J Gleich; Darrell R Schroeder; Amy L Weaver; David O Warner
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Current hurdles in the management of eosinophilic oesophagitis: the next steps.

Authors:  Stephen Ea Attwood; Michael Sj Wilson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Eosinophilic esophagitis in children and adults: a systematic review and consensus recommendations for diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Glenn T Furuta; Chris A Liacouras; Margaret H Collins; Sandeep K Gupta; Chris Justinich; Phil E Putnam; Peter Bonis; Eric Hassall; Alex Straumann; Marc E Rothenberg
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Esophageal impedance and esophagitis in children: any correlation?

Authors:  S Salvatore; B Hauser; T Devreker; S Arrigo; P Marino; C Citro; A Salvatoni; Y Vandenplas
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.839

10.  Esophageal impedance baseline is age dependent.

Authors:  Silvia Salvatore; Alessandro Salvatoni; Marieke Van Berkel; Kristel Van Steen; Dario Unmarino; Abdallah Ghanma; Bruno Hauser; Yvan Vandenplas
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.839

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  A Conceptual Approach to Understanding Treatment Response in Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Authors:  Evan S Dellon; Sandeep K Gupta
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 11.382

2.  Development and Validation of a Mucosal Impedance Contour Analysis System to Distinguish Esophageal Disorders.

Authors:  Dhyanesh A Patel; Tina Higginbotham; James C Slaughter; Muhammad Aslam; Elif Yuksel; David Katzka; C Prakash Gyawali; Melina Mashi; John Pandolfino; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 3.  New Developments in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Authors:  Quan M Nhu; Fouad J Moawad
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-03

Review 4.  EoE disease monitoring: Where we are and where we are going.

Authors:  Bridget Godwin; Benjamin Wilkins; Amanda B Muir
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 6.347

5.  An Evolving Approach to the Diagnosis of Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Authors:  Hannah P Kim; Evan S Dellon
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2018-06

Review 6.  Novel Advances in the Evaluation and Treatment of Children With Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Rachel Rosen
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.569

7.  Trends in gastroesophageal reflux disease research: A bibliometric and visualized study.

Authors:  Tai Zhang; Beihua Zhang; Wende Tian; Yuchen Wei; Fengyun Wang; Xiaolan Yin; Xiuxiu Wei; Jiali Liu; Xudong Tang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.