Literature DB >> 25479939

Correlation between hypersensitivity induced by esophageal acid infusion and the baseline impedance level in patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux.

A Young Seo1, Cheol Min Shin, Nayoung Kim, Hyuk Yoon, Young Soo Park, Dong Ho Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relevance between the pH parameters and baseline impedance level or esophageal hypomotility in patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux.
METHOD: The recordings of 51 patients with heartburn, acid regurgitation, globus or noncardiac chest pain were analyzed. Evaluation included a 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH test while on off-proton pump inhibitor therapy over 1 week, high-resolution manometry and Bernstein test. Mean baseline impedance level at the most distal portion of the impedance channel was assessed manually. Esophageal hypomotility was evaluated using transitional zone defect (TZD) and distal break (DB) length measurement. RESULT: In the study subjects (n = 51), 6 had a DeMeester score of more than 14.7 and 14 had a positive symptom index. The Bernstein test was positive in ten patients. The baseline impedance level was inversely correlated with the acid exposure time % (r = -0.660, P < 0.001). Also, all reflux and weakly acid reflux time % measured by impedance monitoring showed a weak correlation with TZD + DB length (r = 0.327 and 0.324, P = 0.019 and 0.020, respectively). Although a positive Bernstein test has no relevance for the acid exposure time or acid-related symptoms as represented by the DeMeester score or symptom index, the baseline impedance level was significantly lower in patients with a positive Bernstein test than in those with a negative one (2,628.4 ± 862.7 vs. 1,752.2 ± 611.1 Ω, P = 0.004).
CONCLUSION: A lower baseline impedance level is closely related to increased esophageal acid exposure. Hypersensitivity induced by esophageal acid infusion might be attributed to acid-induced mucosal changes of the esophagus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25479939     DOI: 10.1007/s00535-014-1013-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0944-1174            Impact factor:   7.527


  29 in total

1.  In vivo evaluation of acid-induced changes in oesophageal mucosa integrity and sensitivity in non-erosive reflux disease.

Authors:  Philip Woodland; Mohannad Al-Zinaty; Etsuro Yazaki; Daniel Sifrim
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Dilated intercellular spaces of esophageal epithelium in nonerosive reflux disease patients with physiological esophageal acid exposure.

Authors:  Renato Caviglia; Mentore Ribolsi; Nicola Maggiano; Armando M Gabbrielli; Sara Emerenziani; Michele Pier Luca Guarino; Simone Carotti; Fortunéé Irene Habib; Carla Rabitti; Michele Cicala
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Normal values for esophageal high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  A Bogte; A J Bredenoord; J Oors; P D Siersema; A J P M Smout
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 4.  Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography.

Authors:  A J Bredenoord; M Fox; P J Kahrilas; J E Pandolfino; W Schwizer; A J P M Smout
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Analysis of intersegmental trough and proximal latency of smooth muscle contraction using high-resolution esophageal manometry.

Authors:  Nitin Kumar; Ryan F Porter; Jake M Chanin; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.062

6.  The symptom index: a clinically important parameter of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring.

Authors:  G J Wiener; J E Richter; J B Copper; W C Wu; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Dilated intercellular spaces: a morphological feature of acid reflux--damaged human esophageal epithelium.

Authors:  N A Tobey; J L Carson; R A Alkiek; R C Orlando
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Transition zone defect associated with the response to proton pump inhibitor treatment in patients with globus sensation.

Authors:  Min Seok Han; Hyuk Lee; Jung Hyun Jo; In Rae Cho; Jun Chul Park; Sung Kwan Shin; Sang Kil Lee; Yong Chan Lee
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.029

9.  Oesophageal hypersensitivity in Japanese patients with non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux diseases.

Authors:  H Miwa; T Minoo; M Hojo; R Yaginuma; A Nagahara; M Kawabe; A Ohkawa; D Asaoka; A Kurosawa; T Ohkusa; N Sato
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.171

10.  Esophageal pressure topography criteria indicative of incomplete bolus clearance: a study using high-resolution impedance manometry.

Authors:  William J Bulsiewicz; Peter J Kahrilas; Monika A Kwiatek; Sudip K Ghosh; Albert Meek; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  6 in total

1.  The diagnostic value of 24-hour ambulatory intraesophageal pH-impedance in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms comparable with typical symptoms.

Authors:  Yusuf S Sakin; Rukiye Vardar; Baha Sezgin; Zeynep Erdogan Cetin; Yasemin Alev; Esra Yildirim; Tayfun Kirazli; Serhat Bor
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 2.  Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  Fabien Stenard; Antonio Iannelli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Impact of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Risk Factors Associated with Its Occurrence Based Upon Quality of Life.

Authors:  Abdullah Dalboh; Dafer M Al-Shehri; Walid M Abd El Maksoud; Khaled S Abbas; Abdulrahman J Alqahtani; Adnan Q Al-Malki; Khalid A Al-Shahrani
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 4.  Biomarkers of Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Leila Kia; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 5.  Revisiting Montreal: New Insights into Symptoms and Their Causes, and Implications for the Future of GERD.

Authors:  A Pali S Hungin; Michael Molloy-Bland; Carmelo Scarpignato
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Endoscopic-Guided Measurement of Mucosal Admittance can Discriminate Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease from Functional Heartburn.

Authors:  Tomoaki Matsumura; Hideaki Ishigami; Mai Fujie; Takashi Taida; Shingo Kasamatsu; Kenichiro Okimoto; Keiko Saito; Daisuke Maruoka; Tomoo Nakagawa; Takeshi Suzuki; Tatsuro Katsuno; Makoto Arai
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.488

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.