Literature DB >> 22675595

Complete genome sequence of the aerobic, heterotroph Marinithermus hydrothermalis type strain (T1(T)) from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent chimney.

Alex Copeland, Wei Gu, Montri Yasawong, Alla Lapidus, Susan Lucas, Shweta Deshpande, Ioanna Pagani, Roxanne Tapia, Jan-Fang Cheng, Lynne A Goodwin, Sam Pitluck, Konstantinos Liolios, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Natalia Mikhailova, Amrita Pati, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Chongle Pan, Evelyne-Marie Brambilla, Manfred Rohde, Brian J Tindall, Johannes Sikorski, Markus Göker, John C Detter, James Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk, Tanja Woyke.   

Abstract

Marinithermus hydrothermalis Sako et al. 2003 is the type species of the monotypic genus Marinithermus. M. hydrothermalis T1(T) was the first isolate within the phylum "Thermus-Deinococcus" to exhibit optimal growth under a salinity equivalent to that of sea water and to have an absolute requirement for NaCl for growth. M. hydrothermalis T1(T) is of interest because it may provide a new insight into the ecological significance of the aerobic, thermophilic decomposers in the circulation of organic compounds in deep-sea hydrothermal vent ecosystems. This is the first completed genome sequence of a member of the genus Marinithermus and the seventh sequence from the family Thermaceae. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. The 2,269,167 bp long genome with its 2,251 protein-coding and 59 RNA genes is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GEBA; Gram-negative; Thermaceae; hydrothermal vent; neutrophilic heterotroph; non-motile; strictly aerobic; thermophilic

Year:  2012        PMID: 22675595      PMCID: PMC3368408          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.2435521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain T1T (= DSM 14884 = JCM 11576) is the type strain of the species M. hydrothermalis, which is the type species of the monotypic genus Marinithermus [1,2]. The genus name is derived from the Latin word 'marinus' meaning 'of the sea' and the latinized Greek word 'thermos' meaning 'hot', yielding the Neo-Latin word 'Marinithermus' meaning 'an organism living in hot marine places' [1]. The species epithet is derived from the Neo-Latin word 'hydrothermalis' (pertaining to a hydrothermal vent) [1]. Strain T1T was isolated in November 2000 from the surface zone of a deep-sea hydrothermal vent chimney at Suiyo Seamount in the Izu-Bonin Arc, Japan, at a depth of 1,385 m [1]. M. hydrothermalis was the first isolate within the phylum “Thermus-Deinococcus” that grew optimally under a salinity equivalent to that of sea water [1]. The absolute requirement of NaCl for growth distinguishes M. hydrothermalis from members of the genera Thermus and Meiothermus [1,3]. No further isolates have been reported for M. hydrothermalis. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for M. hydrothermalis T1T, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

A representative genomic 16S rRNA sequence of M. hydrothermalis T1T was compared using NCBI BLAST [4,5] under default settings (e.g., considering only the high-scoring segment pairs (HSPs) from the best 250 hits) with the most recent release of the Greengenes database [6] and the relative frequencies of taxa and keywords (reduced to their stem [7]) were determined, weighted by BLAST scores. The most frequently occurring genera were Thermus (91.0%), Oceanithermus (4.9%), Marinithermus (3.3%) and Thermothrix (0.8%) (118 hits in total). Regarding the two hits to sequences from members of the species, the average identity within HSPs was 100.0%, whereas the average coverage by HSPs was 98.0%. Among all other species, the one yielding the highest score was O. profundus (NR_027212), which corresponded to an identity of 91.9% and HSP coverage of 93.3%. (Note that the Greengenes database uses the INSDC (= EMBL/NCBI/DDBJ) annotation, which is not an authoritative source for nomenclature or classification.) The highest-scoring environmental sequence was EU555123 [8] ('Microbial Sulfide Hydrothermal Vent Field Juan de Fuca Ridge Dudley hydrothermal vent clone 4132B16'), which showed an identity of 91.6% and HSP coverage of 92.1%. The most frequently occurring keywords within the labels of all environmental samples which yielded hits were 'spring' (6.9%), 'hot' (5.3%), 'microbi' (3.7%), 'nation, park, yellowston' (3.2%) and 'skin' (3.0%) (132 hits in total). Environmental samples which yielded hits of a higher score than the highest scoring species were not found. These key words are in accordance with the biotope of the strain T1T in the original description [1], although 'skin' indicates the possible presence of relatives in a moderate environment. Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of M. hydrothermalis T1T in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the three identical 16S rRNA gene copies in the genome differ by two nucleotides from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence (AB079382).
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of M. hydrothermalis relative to the type strains of the other species within the family Thermaceae. The tree was inferred from 1,426 aligned characters [9,10] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion [11]. Rooting was done initially using the midpoint method [12] and then checked for its agreement with the current classification (Table 1). The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers adjacent to the branches are support values from 850 ML bootstrap replicates [13] (left) and from 1,000 maximum-parsimony bootstrap replicates [14] (right) if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [15] are labeled with an asterisk, those also listed as 'Complete and Published' with two asterisks [16-19].

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of M. hydrothermalis relative to the type strains of the other species within the family Thermaceae. The tree was inferred from 1,426 aligned characters [9,10] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion [11]. Rooting was done initially using the midpoint method [12] and then checked for its agreement with the current classification (Table 1). The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers adjacent to the branches are support values from 850 ML bootstrap replicates [13] (left) and from 1,000 maximum-parsimony bootstrap replicates [14] (right) if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [15] are labeled with an asterisk, those also listed as 'Complete and Published' with two asterisks [16-19].
Table 1

Classification and general features of M. hydrothermalis T1T according to the MIGS recommendations [20] and the NamesforLife database [21].

MIGS ID    Property      Term    Evidence code
    Current classification      Domain Bacteria    TAS [22]
      Phylum "Deinococcus-Thermus"    TAS [23-25]
      Class Deinococci    TAS [26,27]
      Order Thermales    TAS [26,28]
      Family Thermaceae    TAS [26,29]
      Genus Marinithermus    TAS [1]
      Species Marinithermus hydrothermalis    TAS [1]
      Type strain T1    TAS [1]
    Gram stain      negative    TAS [1]
    Cell shape      straight rods    TAS [1]
    Motility      non-motile    TAS [1]
    Sporulation      none    NAS
    Temperature range      50.0°C-72.5°C    TAS [1]
    Optimum temperature      67.5°C    TAS [1]
    Salinity      0.5-4.5%, optimum 3% NaCl    TAS [1]
MIGS-22    Oxygen requirement      strictly aerobic    TAS [1]
    Carbon source      casamino acids, yeast extract, tryptone    TAS [1]
    Energy metabolism      neutrophilic heterotroph    TAS [1]
MIGS-6    Habitat      deep-sea, hydrothermal vent, marine    TAS [1]
MIGS-15    Biotic relationship      free-living    NAS
MIGS-14    Pathogenicity      not reported
    Biosafety level      1    TAS [30]
    Isolation      deep-sea hydrothermal vent chimny    TAS [1]
MIGS-4    Geographic location      Suiyo Seamount, Izu-Bonin Arc, Japan    TAS [1]
MIGS-5    Sample collection time      November 2000    TAS [1]
MIGS-4.1    Latitude      28.65    TAS [1]
MIGS-4.2    Longitude      140.82    TAS [1]
MIGS-4.3    Depth      1,385 m    TAS [1]
MIGS-4.4    Altitude      - 1,385 m    TAS [1]

Evidence codes - NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [31].

The cells of strain T1T are Gram-negative, non-motile, straight rods measuring 7.5 - 9.4 µm by 0.9 - 1.0 µm during the exponential growth phase [1] (Figure 2 and Table 1). In the stationary growth phase the cells tend to form filaments [1]. Rotund bodies were not observed from the cells [1]. Cells of strain T1T have an envelope which consists of a cytoplasmic membrane with a simple outline and a cell wall with an inner, electron-dense thin layer, which presumably represents the peptidoglycan [1]. Colonies are whitish and have 2.5 - 3.0 mm of diameter [1]. The organism is an obligate heterotroph and grows only under strictly aerobic culture conditions [1]. Growth was not observed in anaerobic or autotrophic culture conditions [1]. However, it should be noted that according to Mori and colleagues [32] this was tested only in the presence of sulfide. Steinsbu and colleagues [3] argue that it is therefore possible that M. hydrothermalis has the capability of anaerobic growth under unreduced conditions, as has been observed for Rhabdothermus arcticus, Vulcanithermus mediatlanticus, O. profundus and O. desulfurans [3,32-34]. Unlike members of the genus Thermus, reactions were negative for catalase- and cytochrome oxidase and hydrolysis of gelatin, starch or casein was negative [1]. Growth occurs over the temperature range of 50.0 - 72.5°C (optimum 67.5°C), pH range 6.25 - 7.75 (optimum pH 7.0), and at NaCl concentrations in the range 0.5 - 4.5% (optimum 3%) [1]. The generation time under the above listed optimal condition and in medium MJYPV is about 30 minutes [1]. M. hydrothermalis T1T differs from the members of the genera Oceanithermus by having a higher optimal temperature for growth and a higher oxygen tolerance [3]. Strain T1T is able to utilize complex organic substrates such as Casamino acids, tryptone and yeast extract as sole energy and carbon sources [1].
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of M. hydrothermalis T1T

Scanning electron micrograph of M. hydrothermalis T1T Evidence codes - NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [31]. Strain T1T shares with its closest related genome-sequenced neighbors, O. profundus [17], Meiothermus silvanus [18] and Thermus thermophilus [16] (Figure 1), the presence of two linked 5S-23S rRNA gene clusters, with two 16S rRNA genes located separately in the genomes, but has one surplus, third 16S rRNA gene copy.

Chemotaxonomy

The major cellular fatty acids of strain T1T, when grown at 67.5°C, were iso-C15:0 (40.4%), iso-C17:0 (28.5%), C16:0 (12.9%), anteiso-C15:0 (6.0%), anteiso-C17:0 (5.4%), iso-C16:0 (2.8%) and iso 3-OH C11:0 (1.0%). Menaquinone-8 was the major respiratory quinone. The fatty acid and respiratory quinone composition were similar to those of members of the genus Thermus, as described previously [35,36]. However, the presence of iso 3-OH C11:0 in strain T1T distinguishes it from Thermus species [1].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [37], and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of acteria and rchaea project [38]. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes OnLine Database [15] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID   Property    Term
MIGS-31   Finishing quality    Finished
MIGS-28   Libraries used    Four genomic libraries: one 454 pyrosequence standard library, two 454 PE libraries (7.0 kb insert size), one Illumina library
MIGS-29   Sequencing platforms    Illumina GAii, 454 GS FLX Titanium
MIGS-31.2   Sequencing coverage    1,608.4 × Illumina; 58.1 × pyrosequence
MIGS-30   Assemblers    Newbler version 2.3, Velvet version 0.7.63, phrap version SPS - 4.24
MIGS-32   Gene calling method    Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP
   INSDC ID    CP002630
   Genbank Date of Release    April 15, 2011
   GOLD ID    Gc001721
   NCBI project ID    50827
   Database: IMG-GEBA    2504643006
MIGS-13   Source material identifier    DSM 14884
   Project relevance    Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

M. hydrothermalis T1T, DSM 14884, was grown in DSMZ medium 973 (Marinithermus hydrothermalis medium) [39] at 70°C. DNA was isolated from 0.5-1 g of cell paste using MasterPure Gram-positive DNA purification kit (Epicentre MGP04100) following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer, with modification st/DL for cell lysis as described in Wu et al. [38]. DNA is available through the DNA Bank Network [40].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at the JGI website [41]. Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler (Roche). The initial Newbler assembly consisting of 70 contigs in one scaffold was converted into a phrap [42] assembly by making fake reads from the consensus, to collect the read pairs in the 454 paired end library. Illumina GAii sequencing data (3,943.0 Mb) was assembled with Velvet [43] and the consensus sequences were shredded into 2.0 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. The 454 draft assembly was based on 167.5 Mb 454 draft data and all of the 454 paired end data. Newbler parameters are -consed -a 50 -l 350 -g -m -ml 20. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package [42] was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment in the subsequent finishing process. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution [41], Dupfinisher [44], or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J.-F. Chang, unpublished). A total of 97 additional reactions were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. Illumina reads were also used to correct potential base errors and increase consensus quality using a software Polisher developed at JGI [45]. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together, the combination of the Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms provided 1,666.5 × coverage of the genome. The final assembly contained 458,684 pyrosequence and 48,027,166 Illumina reads.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [46] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [47]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) non-redundant database, UniProt, TIGR-Fam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [48].

Genome properties

The genome consists of a 2,269,167 bp long chromosome with a 68.1% GC content (Figure 3 and Table 3). Of the 2,310 genes predicted, 2,251 were protein-coding genes, and 59 RNAs; 46 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (75.5%) were assigned with a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 3

Genome Statistics

Attribute    Value    % of Total
Genome size (bp)    2,269,167    100.00%
DNA coding region (bp)    2,092,686    92.22%
DNA G+C content (bp)    1,544,754    68.08%
Number of replicons    1
Extrachromosomal elements    0
Total genes    2,310    100.00%
RNA genes    59    2.55%
RNA operons    2*
Protein-coding genes    2,251    97.45%
Pseudo genes    46    1.99%
Genes with function prediction    1,743    75.45%
Genes in paralog clusters    963    41.69%
Genes assigned to COGs    1,858    80.43%
Genes assigned Pfam domains    1,840    79.65%
Genes with signal peptides    479    20.74%
Genes with transmembrane helices    512    22.16%
CRISPR repeats    4

* but three 16S rRNA genes

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code   Value  %age    Description
J   151  7.5    Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A   0  0.0    RNA processing and modification
K   96  4.7    Transcription
L   99  4.9    Replication, recombination and repair
B   2  0.1    Chromatin structure and dynamics
D   27  1.3    Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y   0  0.0    Nuclear structure
V   30  1.5    Defense mechanisms
T   73  3.6    Signal transduction mechanisms
M   108  5.3    Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N   21  1.0    Cell motility
Z   0  0.0    Cytoskeleton
W   0  0.0    Extracellular structures
U   49  2.4    Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport
O   86  4.2    Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C   149  7.4    Energy production and conversion
G   125  6.2    Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E   215  10.6    Amino acid transport and metabolism
F   67  3.3    Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H   117  5.8    Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I   77  3.8    Lipid transport and metabolism
P   94  4.6    Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q   33  1.6    Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R   255  12.6    General function prediction only
S   154  7.6    Function unknown
-   452  19.6    Not in COGs
Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew. * but three 16S rRNA genes
  30 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  The Deinococcus-Thermus phylum and the effect of rRNA composition on phylogenetic tree construction.

Authors:  W G Weisburg; S J Giovannoni; C R Woese
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.022

3.  Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSEM. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.747

4.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB.

Authors:  T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  List of Bacterial Names with Standing in Nomenclature: a folder available on the Internet.

Authors:  J P Euzéby
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1997-04

8.  The genome sequence of the extreme thermophile Thermus thermophilus.

Authors:  Anke Henne; Holger Brüggemann; Carsten Raasch; Arnim Wiezer; Thomas Hartsch; Heiko Liesegang; Andre Johann; Tanja Lienard; Olivia Gohl; Rosa Martinez-Arias; Carsten Jacobi; Vytaute Starkuviene; Silke Schlenczeck; Silke Dencker; Robert Huber; Hans-Peter Klenk; Wilfried Kramer; Rainer Merkl; Gerhard Gottschalk; Hans-Joachim Fritz
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2004-04-04       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; I-Min A Chen; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Philip Hugenholtz; Victor M Markowitz; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  1 in total

1.  Two ATP-binding cassette transporters involved in (S)-2-aminoethyl-cysteine uptake in thermus thermophilus.

Authors:  Yuko Kanemaru; Fumihito Hasebe; Takeo Tomita; Tomohisa Kuzuyama; Makoto Nishiyama
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.490

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.