| Literature DB >> 21304690 |
Johannes Sikorski, Brian J Tindall, Stephen Lowry, Susan Lucas, Matt Nolan, Alex Copeland, Tijana Glavina Del Rio, Hope Tice, Jan-Fang Cheng, Cliff Han, Sam Pitluck, Konstantinos Liolios, Natalia Ivanova, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Natalia Mikhailova, Amrita Pati, Lynne Goodwin, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Yun-Juan Chang, Cynthia D Jeffries, Manfred Rohde, Markus Göker, Tanja Woyke, James Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Nikos C Kyrpides, Hans-Peter Klenk, Alla Lapidus.
Abstract
Meiothermus silvanus (Tenreiro et al. 1995) Nobre et al. 1996 belongs to a thermophilic genus whose members share relatively low degrees of 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity. Meiothermus constitutes an evolutionary lineage separate from members of the genus Thermus, from which they can generally be distinguished by their slightly lower temperature optima. M. silvanus is of special interest as it causes colored biofilms in the paper making industry and may thus be of economic importance as a biofouler. This is the second completed genome sequence of a member of the genus Meiothermus and only the third genome sequence to be published from a member of the family Thermaceae. The 3,721,669 bp long genome with its 3,667 protein-coding and 55 RNA genes is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.Entities:
Keywords: Deinococci; GEBA; Gram-negative; Thermales; aerobic; biofouler; colored biofilm in paper industry; thermophilic
Year: 2010 PMID: 21304690 PMCID: PMC3035272 DOI: 10.4056/sigs.1042812
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stand Genomic Sci ISSN: 1944-3277
Classification and general features of M. silvanus VI-R2T according to the MIGS recommendations [19]
| | | | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current classification | Domain | TAS [ | |
| Phylum ‘ | TAS [ | ||
| Class | TAS [ | ||
| Order | TAS [ | ||
| Family | TAS [ | ||
| Genus | TAS [ | ||
| Species | TAS [ | ||
| Type strain RI-V2 | TAS [ | ||
| Gram stain | negative | TAS [ | |
| Cell shape | rod | TAS [ | |
| Motility | nonmotile | TAS [ | |
| Sporulation | no | TAS [ | |
| Temperature range | 40°C–65°C | TAS [ | |
| Optimum temperature | 55°C | TAS [ | |
| Salinity | does not grow with 1% or more NaCl | TAS [ | |
| MIGS-22 | Oxygen requirement | aerobic | TAS [ |
| Carbon source | a diverse set of sugars | TAS [ | |
| Energy source | carbohydrates | TAS [ | |
| MIGS-6 | Habitat | hot springs | TAS [ |
| MIGS-15 | Biotic relationship | free-living | TAS [ |
| MIGS-14 | Pathogenicity | not reported | |
| Biosafety level | 1 | TAS [ | |
| Isolation | hot spring | TAS [ | |
| MIGS-4 | Geographic location | Vizela, Portugal | TAS [ |
| MIGS-5 | Sample collection time | 1995 or before | TAS [ |
| MIGS-4.1 | Latitude | 41.38 | NAS |
| MIGS-4.3 | Depth | unknown | |
| MIGS-4.4 | Altitude | 157 m | NAS |
Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [29]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.
Figure 1Scanning electron micrograph of M. silvanus VI-R2T.
Figure 2Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of M. silvanus VI-R2T relative to the type strains of the other species within the genus and to the other type strains within the family Thermaceae. The tree was inferred from 1,442 aligned characters [30,31] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [32] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy [33]. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 900 bootstrap replicates [34] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [35] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold, i.e. Thermus thermophilus (AP008226) and the type species of the genus, M. ruber [36].
Genome sequencing project information
| | | |
|---|---|---|
| MIGS-31 | Finishing quality | Finished |
| MIGS-28 | Libraries used | Three genomic libraries: |
| MIGS-29 | Sequencing platforms | ABI3730, 454 Titanium, Illumina GAii |
| MIGS-31.2 | Sequencing coverage | 8.3× Sanger; 16.6× pyrosequence |
| MIGS-30 | Assemblers | Newbler version 1.1.02.15, Arachne |
| MIGS-32 | Gene calling method | Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP |
| INSDC ID | CP002042 chromosome | |
| Genbank Date of Release | June 4, 2010 | |
| GOLD ID | Gc01327 | |
| NCBI project ID | 29551 | |
| Database: IMG-GEBA | 2502790002 | |
| MIGS-13 | Source material identifier | DSM 9946 |
| Project relevance | Tree of Life, GEBA |
Genome Statistics
| | | |
|---|---|---|
| Genome size (bp) | 3,721,669 | 100.00% |
| DNA Coding region (bp) | 3,283,226 | 88.22% |
| DNA G+C content (bp) | 2,334,056 | 62.72% |
| Number of replicons | 3 | |
| Extrachromosomal elements | 2 | |
| Total genes | 3,722 | 100.00% |
| RNA genes | 55 | 1.48% |
| rRNA operons | 2 | |
| Protein-coding genes | 3,667 | 98.52% |
| Pseudo genes | 158 | 4.25% |
| Genes with function prediction | 2,400 | 64.48% |
| Genes in paralog clusters | 740 | 19.89% |
| Genes assigned to COGs | 2,530 | 67.97% |
| Genes assigned Pfam domains | 2,797 | 75.15% |
| Genes with signal peptides | 1,249 | 33.56% |
| Genes with transmembrane helices | 796 | 21.39% |
| CRISPR repeats | 16 |
Figure 3Graphical circular map of the genome and the larger of the two plasmids (not drawn to scale). From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.
Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories
| | | | |
|---|---|---|---|
| J | 151 | 5.4 | Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis |
| A | 0 | 0.0 | RNA processing and modification |
| K | 166 | 6.0 | Transcription |
| L | 195 | 7.0 | Replication, recombination and repair |
| B | 2 | 0.1 | Chromatin structure and dynamics |
| D | 33 | 1.2 | Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning |
| Y | 0 | 0.0 | Nuclear structure |
| V | 43 | 1.6 | Defense mechanisms |
| T | 120 | 4.3 | Signal transduction mechanisms |
| M | 128 | 4.6 | Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis |
| N | 26 | 0.9 | Cell motility |
| Z | 0 | 0.0 | Cytoskeleton |
| W | 0 | 0.0 | Extracellular structures |
| U | 53 | 1.9 | Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport |
| O | 107 | 5.5 | Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones |
| C | 168 | 6.1 | Energy production and conversion |
| G | 218 | 7.9 | Carbohydrate transport and metabolism |
| E | 292 | 10.5 | Amino acid transport and metabolism |
| F | 85 | 3.1 | Nucleotide transport and metabolism |
| H | 110 | 4.0 | Coenzyme transport and metabolism |
| I | 88 | 3.2 | Lipid transport and metabolism |
| P | 152 | 5.5 | Inorganic ion transport and metabolism |
| Q | 52 | 1.9 | Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism |
| R | 362 | 13.0 | General function prediction only |
| S | 227 | 8.2 | Function unknown |
| - | 1,192 | 32.0 | Not in COGs |