Literature DB >> 12914270

Failed degenerative lumbar spine surgery.

Ashish D Diwan1, Hari Parvartaneni, Frank Cammisa.   

Abstract

Significant back and leg symptoms develop in approximately 10%-15% of patients who have undergone a spinal decompression procedure and approximately 15%-20% of patients who have had a spinal fusion procedure for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine during the ensuing 3-5 year so that they require revision lumbar surgery. The cause for their symptoms has to be diligently looked for, as that is a main predictor of good outcome following revision surgery. Good history taking, including a detailed old chart review, repeat physical evaluation, and input from therapists--physical and psychological, neurologist, and other caregivers--should be sought. These, together with intelligent use of investigations, go a long way in helping establish a cause for failure. Furthermore, developing a revision surgical strategy is also an intellectual exercise in which a simple algorithmic approach may not always work. The process of evaluation and surgical management for failed lumbar degeneration is a science and an art that requires a great deal of understanding and commitment on the part of the surgeon. The temporal trend of improving outcomes is aided in part by emerging technologies, however, one has to be constantly aware of simple factors that influence outcome. The use of published literature and experiences of peers helps one offer appropriate surgical intervention while improving the long-term results of revision surgery of the lumbar spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12914270     DOI: 10.1016/s0030-5898(03)00028-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am        ISSN: 0030-5898            Impact factor:   2.472


  8 in total

1.  No difference in 9-year outcome in CLBP patients randomized to lumbar fusion versus cognitive intervention and exercises.

Authors:  Anne Froholdt; Olav Reikeraas; Inger Holm; Anne Keller; Jens Ivar Brox
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Long-term outcomes of the revision open lumbar discectomy by fenestration: A follow-up study of more than 10 years.

Authors:  Jiong Jiong Guo; Huilin Yang; Tiansi Tang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Segment-by-segment stabilization for degenerative disc disease: a hybrid technique.

Authors:  Othmar Schwarzenbach; Nathalie Rohrbach; Ulrich Berlemann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Efficacy of spinal implant removal after thoracolumbar junction fusion.

Authors:  Seok Won Kim; Chang Il Ju; Chong Gue Kim; Seung Myung Lee; Ho Shin
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2008-03-20

5.  The outcome of pedicle screw instrumentation removal for ongoing low back pain following posterolateral lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Mario G Zotti; Oscar P Brumby-Rendell; Ben McDonald; Tom Fisher; Christovalantis Tsimiklis; Wai Weng Yoon; Orso L Osti
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-12

6.  Biomechanical evaluation of a novel posterior integrated clamp that attaches to an existing posterior instrumentation for use in thoracolumbar revision.

Authors:  Patrick Senatus; Suresh Reddy Chinthakunta; Pedram Vazifeh; Saif Khalil
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2013-03-06

7.  Exercise therapy for low back pain: a narrative review of the literature.

Authors:  Kristopher Keller
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2006

8.  Assessment of the suitability of biodegradable rods for use in posterior lumbar fusion: An in-vitro biomechanical evaluation and finite element analysis.

Authors:  Fon-Yih Tsuang; Yueh-Ying Hsieh; Yi-Jie Kuo; Chia-Hsien Chen; Feng-Huei Lin; Chen-Sheng Chen; Chang-Jung Chiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.