Literature DB >> 12973134

Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration.

Jens Ivar Brox1, Roger Sørensen, Astrid Friis, Øystein Nygaard, Aage Indahl, Anne Keller, Tor Ingebrigtsen, Hege R Eriksen, Inger Holm, Anne Kathrine Koller, Rolf Riise, Olav Reikerås.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Single blind randomized study.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of lumbar instrumented fusion with cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: To the authors' best knowledge, only one randomized study has evaluated the effectiveness of lumbar fusion. The Swedish Lumbar Spine Study reported that lumbar fusion was better than continuing physiotherapy and care by the family physician. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-four patients aged 25-60 years with low back pain lasting longer than 1 year and evidence of disc degeneration at L4-L5 and/or L5-S1 at radiographic examination were randomized to either lumbar fusion with posterior transpedicular screws and postoperative physiotherapy, or cognitive intervention and exercises. The cognitive intervention consisted of a lecture to give the patient an understanding that ordinary physical activity would not harm the disc and a recommendation to use the back and bend it. This was reinforced by three daily physical exercise sessions for 3 weeks. The main outcome measure was the Oswestry Disability Index.
RESULTS: At the 1-year follow-up visit, 97% of the patients, including 6 patients who had either not attended treatment or changed groups, were examined. The Oswestry Disability Index was significantly reduced from 41 to 26 after surgery, compared with 42 to 30 after cognitive intervention and exercises. The mean difference between groups was 2.3 (-6.7 to 11.4) (P = 0.33). Improvements inback pain, use of analgesics, emotional distress, life satisfaction, and return to work were not different. Fear-avoidance beliefs and fingertip-floor distance were reduced more after nonoperative treatment, and lower limb pain was reduced more after surgery. The success rate according to an independent observer was 70% after surgery and 76% after cognitive intervention and exercises. The early complication rate in the surgical group was 18%.
CONCLUSION: The main outcome measure showed equal improvement in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration randomized to cognitive intervention and exercises, or lumbar fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12973134     DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000083234.62751.7A

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  112 in total

1.  Predictors of outcome after surgery with disc prosthesis and rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc: 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Christian Hellum; Lars Gunnar Johnsen; Øyvind Gjertsen; Linda Berg; Gesche Neckelmann; Oliver Grundnes; Ivar Rossvoll; Jan Sture Skouen; Jens Ivar Brox; Kjersti Storheim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  No difference in 9-year outcome in CLBP patients randomized to lumbar fusion versus cognitive intervention and exercises.

Authors:  Anne Froholdt; Olav Reikeraas; Inger Holm; Anne Keller; Jens Ivar Brox
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Exercise in the management of chronic back pain.

Authors:  Thomas E Dreisinger
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

4.  Differences among outcome measures in occupational low back pain.

Authors:  Sue A Ferguson; William S Marras; Deborah L Burr
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-09

5.  Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Pain and Functional Outcomes After Lumbar Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Sara Khor; Danielle Lavallee; Amy M Cizik; Carlo Bellabarba; Jens R Chapman; Christopher R Howe; Dawei Lu; A Alex Mohit; Rod J Oskouian; Jeffrey R Roh; Neal Shonnard; Armagan Dagal; David R Flum
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Fusion as treatment for chronic low back pain--existing evidence, the scientific frontier and research strategies.

Authors:  Peter Fritzell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Policy-relevant research: when does it matter?

Authors:  Gary M Franklin; Thomas M Wickizer; Deborah Fulton-Kehoe; Judith A Turner
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2004-07

8.  Surgery versus intensive rehabilitation programmes for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Bart W Koes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-05-28

Review 9.  Health economic evaluation in lumbar spinal fusion: a systematic literature review anno 2005.

Authors:  Rikke Soegaard; Finn B Christensen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Methodological aspects of outcomes research.

Authors:  Rudi Hiebert; Margareta Nordin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-30       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.