Literature DB >> 12698128

Measuring self-reported functional status and pain in patients with chronic low back pain by postal questionnaires: a reliability study.

Inger Holm1, Astrid Friis, Kjersti Storheim, Jens Ivar Brox.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A reliability study was performed.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the test-retest reliability of self-reported functional status and pain in chronic low back pain patients by postal questionnaires. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Evaluation tools focusing on the patients' self-reported physical function are recommended in studies on low back pain. Postal questionnaires are inexpensive and should be considered to assess long-term results. The reliability of a postal questionnaire has not been assessed in patients with chronic low back pain.
METHODS: Forty-two patients with chronic low back pain (15 men, 27 women; mean age, 40 years; range, 20-61 years) agreed to participate in the study. The mean duration of symptoms was 8.9 years (range, 1-40 years). A postal questionnaire was sent to the patients twice within a 2-week interval. The questionnaire included the following items: work, back satisfaction, General Function Score (GFS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), pain, fear-avoidance beliefs, life satisfaction and pain medication.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (88%) returned both questionnaires. Except for lumbar pain, there were no statistical differences between the answers from the two questionnaires. The intraclass coefficient values ranged from 0.70 (lumbar pain) to 0.94 (ODI). The repeatability or absolute size of measurement error was 11.9 for the ODI and 28.6 and 34.2 for lumbar and leg pain, respectively. The kappa values for work, back satisfaction, and pain medication were 0.94 and 0.61, 0.62, and 0.64, respectively. The kappa values for the separate items in the GFS ranged from 0.41 to 0.79. The correlations between ODI and the GFS, lumbar pain, life satisfaction, and back satisfaction were 0.35, -0.72, -0.76, and 0.76, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The ODI was highly reliable. The questions about work, back satisfaction, and pain medication showed good agreement. The GFS, pain intensity, fear-avoidance beliefs, and life satisfaction appeared to lack sufficient reliability to be recommended in postal questionnaires.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12698128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  26 in total

1.  Good brace compliance reduced curve progression and surgical rates in patients with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jens Ivar Brox; Johan Emil Lange; Ragnhild Beate Gunderson; Harald Steen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [Optimized assessment of the outcome in patients with radicular back pain of the lumbar spine. The modified NASS questionnaire].

Authors:  M Janousek; S Ferrari; U D Schmid; H A Bischoff; M Balsiger; R Theiler
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  Comparison of graded exercise and graded exposure clinical outcomes for patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Steven Z George; Virgil T Wittmer; Roger B Fillingim; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  No difference in 9-year outcome in CLBP patients randomized to lumbar fusion versus cognitive intervention and exercises.

Authors:  Anne Froholdt; Olav Reikeraas; Inger Holm; Anne Keller; Jens Ivar Brox
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 1: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity.

Authors:  A F Mannion; A Junge; J C T Fairbank; J Dvorak; D Grob
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-04-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Work-related outcome assessment instruments.

Authors:  Achim Elfering
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Preliminary study into the components of the fear-avoidance model of LBP: change after an initial chiropractic visit and influence on outcome.

Authors:  Jonathan R Field; Dave Newell; Peter W McCarthy
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2010-07-30

8.  Function after spinal treatment, exercise and rehabilitation (FASTER): improving the functional outcome of spinal surgery.

Authors:  A H McGregor; C J Doré; T P Morris; S Morris; K Jamrozik
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Retaining the patient perspective in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set for low back pain.

Authors:  Cecilie Røe; Unni Sveen; Erik Bautz-Holter
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  Radial extracorporeal shockwave treatment compared with supervised exercises in patients with subacromial pain syndrome: single blind randomised study.

Authors:  Kaia Engebretsen; Margreth Grotle; Erik Bautz-Holter; Leiv Sandvik; Niels G Juel; Ole Marius Ekeberg; Jens Ivar Brox
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.