Literature DB >> 21044931

Non-absorbable interrupted versus absorbable continuous skin closure in pediatric appendectomies.

S L Pauniaho1, T Lahdes-Vasama, M T Helminen, T Iber, E Mäkelä, O Pajulo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: appendectomy wounds are still commonly closed with non-absorbable sutures. Stitch removal has financial costs and causes anxiety in children. Our aim was to compare interrupted non-absorbable (NA) and continuous intradermal absorbable (A) sutures in appendectomy wounds to evaluate whether absorbable suturing increases the risk of complications.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 198 children (age 4-18 years) including perforated cases were prospectively randomized into two groups (NA and A skin closure). The wounds and inflammatory markers were evaluated on the first two postoperative days. The appearance of the wound was evaluated one week postoperatively by a district nurse. Follow-up data were obtained from 166 patients (87 in NA group and 79 in A group).
RESULTS: in NA group 86 % and in A group 81 % had appendicitis (8 % and 15.6 % perforated and 9.3 % and 25 % gangrenous cases in NA and A groups, respectively). The total wound infection rate was low, 1.8 % (2.3 % in NA Group and 1.3% in A Group). No differences in the inflammatory markers or the appearance of the wound were noted between the groups, but nine children in NA Group (10.3 %) had a partial wound dehiscence after stitch removal.
CONCLUSION: appendectomy wounds in children can be closed with continuous, absorbable sutures, even in complicated cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21044931     DOI: 10.1177/145749691009900308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Surg        ISSN: 1457-4969            Impact factor:   2.360


  9 in total

1.  Wound healing after open appendectomies in adult patients: a prospective, randomised trial comparing two methods of wound closure.

Authors:  S Kotaluoto; S-L Pauniaho; M Helminen; H Kuokkanen; T Rantanen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Systematic review of absorbable vs non-absorbable sutures used for the closure of surgical incisions.

Authors:  Muhammad S Sajid; Malcolm R McFall; Pauline A Whitehouse; Parv S Sains
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-12-27

3.  Appendectomy in Germany-an analysis of a nationwide survey 2011/2012.

Authors:  Dirk Rolf Bulian; Jürgen Knuth; Axel Sauerwald; Michael Alfred Ströhlein; Rolf Lefering; Jörg Ansorg; Markus Maria Heiss
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Appendectomy Skin Closure Technique, Randomized Controlled Trial: Changing Paradigms (ASC).

Authors:  Luis Angel Medina Andrade; Franz Yeudiel Pérez Muñoz; María Valeria Jiménez Báez; Stephanie Serrano Collazos; Maria de Los Angeles Martinez Ferretiz; Brenda Ruiz; Oscar Montes; Stephanie Woolf; Jessica Gonzalez Noriega; Uriel Maldonado Aparicio; Israel Gonzalez Gonzalez
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Continuous absorbable intradermal sutures yield better cosmetic results than nonabsorbable interrupted sutures in open appendectomy wounds: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Anne Koskela; Sannamari Kotaluoto; Ilkka Kaartinen; Satu-Liisa Pauniaho; Tuomo Rantanen; Hannu Kuokkanen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Subcuticular sutures for skin closure in non-obstetric surgery.

Authors:  Saori Goto; Takashi Sakamoto; Riki Ganeko; Koya Hida; Toshi A Furukawa; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-09

Review 7.  Outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses of appendicitis treatments in children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nigel J Hall; Mufiza Z Kapadia; Simon Eaton; Winnie W Y Chan; Cheri Nickel; Agostino Pierro; Martin Offringa
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  The Japan Society for Surgical Infection: guidelines for the prevention, detection, and management of gastroenterological surgical site infection, 2018.

Authors:  Hiroki Ohge; Toshihiko Mayumi; Seiji Haji; Yuichi Kitagawa; Masahiro Kobayashi; Motomu Kobayashi; Toru Mizuguchi; Yasuhiko Mohri; Fumie Sakamoto; Junzo Shimizu; Katsunori Suzuki; Motoi Uchino; Chizuru Yamashita; Masahiro Yoshida; Koichi Hirata; Yoshinobu Sumiyama; Shinya Kusachi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 9.  Intraoperative surgical site infection control and prevention: a position paper and future addendum to WSES intra-abdominal infections guidelines.

Authors:  Belinda De Simone; Massimo Sartelli; Federico Coccolini; Chad G Ball; Pietro Brambillasca; Massimo Chiarugi; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Gabriela Nita; Davide Corbella; Ari Leppaniemi; Elena Boschini; Ernest E Moore; Walter Biffl; Andrew Peitzmann; Yoram Kluger; Michael Sugrue; Gustavo Fraga; Salomone Di Saverio; Dieter Weber; Boris Sakakushev; Osvaldo Chiara; Fikri M Abu-Zidan; Richard Ten Broek; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Imtiaz Wani; Raul Coimbra; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Micheal D Kelly; Luca Ansaloni; Fausto Catena
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 5.469

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.