Literature DB >> 22663560

Reading through a noisy channel: why there's nothing special about the perception of orthography.

Dennis Norris1, Sachiko Kinoshita.   

Abstract

The goal of research on how letter identity and order are perceived during reading is often characterized as one of "cracking the orthographic code." Here, we suggest that there is no orthographic code to crack: Words are perceived and represented as sequences of letters, just as in a dictionary. Indeed, words are perceived and represented in exactly the same way as other visual objects. The phenomena that have been taken as evidence for specialized orthographic representations can be explained by assuming that perception involves recovering information that has passed through a noisy channel: the early stages of visual perception. The noisy channel introduces uncertainty into letter identity, letter order, and even whether letters are present or absent. We develop a computational model based on this simple principle and show that it can accurately simulate lexical decision data from the lexicon projects in English, French, and Dutch, along with masked priming data that have been taken as evidence for specialized orthographic representations. Copyright 2012 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22663560     DOI: 10.1037/a0028450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  25 in total

1.  Tracking the time course of letter visual-similarity effects during word recognition: A masked priming ERP investigation.

Authors:  Eva Gutiérrez-Sigut; Ana Marcet; Manuel Perea
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  A compositional neural code in high-level visual cortex can explain jumbled word reading.

Authors:  Aakash Agrawal; Kvs Hari; S P Arun
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  An RT distribution analysis of relatedness proportion effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization reveals different mechanisms.

Authors:  Bianca de Wit; Sachiko Kinoshita
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-01

4.  Consonantal overlap effects in a perceptual matching task.

Authors:  Stéphanie Massol; Manuel Carreiras; Jon Andoni Duñabeitia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-02       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Phonological priming effects with same-script primes and targets in the masked priming same-different task.

Authors:  Huilan Yang; Masahiro Yoshihara; Mariko Nakayama; Giacomo Spinelli; Stephen J Lupker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-01

6.  Orthographic and phonological processing in developing readers revealed by ERPs.

Authors:  Marianna D Eddy; Jonathan Grainger; Phillip J Holcomb; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Alive and grasping: stable and rapid semantic access to an object category but not object graspability.

Authors:  Ben D Amsel; Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Transposed letter priming effects and allographic variation in Arabic: Insights from lexical decision and the same-different task.

Authors:  Sami Boudelaa; Dennis Norris; Abdesattar Mahfoudhi; Sachiko Kinoshita
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Transposed-letter priming effects in reading aloud words and nonwords.

Authors:  Petroula Mousikou; Sachiko Kinoshita; Simon Wu; Dennis Norris
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

10.  Letter order is not coded by open bigrams.

Authors:  Sachiko Kinoshita; Dennis Norris
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.