Literature DB >> 32839892

Phonological priming effects with same-script primes and targets in the masked priming same-different task.

Huilan Yang1, Masahiro Yoshihara2, Mariko Nakayama3, Giacomo Spinelli4, Stephen J Lupker5.   

Abstract

Norris, Kinoshita and colleagues (Kinoshita & Norris, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(1), 1-18, 2009; Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(3), 434-455, 2010; Norris & Kinoshita, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(1), 194-204, 2008) have suggested that the masked priming same-different task (SDT) is an excellent tool for studying the orthographic coding process because, in most circumstances, performance in that task is driven entirely by orthographic codes. More specifically, although evidence of phonological influences (i.e., phonological priming effects in the SDT) have been reported, Kinoshita, Gayed, and Norris (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(11), 1661-1671, 2018) have claimed that phonological priming does not arise in the SDT when the prime and target are written in the same script and the targets are words, the most typical experimental situation. Indeed, it does appear that no-one has yet reported phonological priming effects in such situations. The question of whether it is possible to observe phonological priming in such situations was more fully examined in the present experiments. Experiment 1 involved a masked priming SDT using Japanese Kanji script in which the primes and targets were homophonic but shared no characters. Experiment 2 was a parallel experiment using Chinese stimuli. In both experiments, phonological priming effects were observed for both one- and two-character words. These experiments indicate that, although the priming effects in masked priming SDTs undoubtedly have a strong orthographic basis, phonological codes also play a role even when the prime and (word) target are written in the same script.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chinese; Homophonic; Japanese; Masked priming same-different task; Orthographic; Phonological

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32839892     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-020-01080-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  19 in total

1.  The spatial coding model of visual word identification.

Authors:  Colin J Davis
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Masked inhibitory priming in english: evidence for lexical inhibition.

Authors:  Colin J Davis; Stephen J Lupker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Letter position information and printed word perception: the relative-position priming constraint.

Authors:  Jonathan Grainger; Jean-Pierre Granier; Fernand Farioli; Eva Van Assche; Walter J B van Heuven
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Transposed-letter priming of prelexical orthographic representations.

Authors:  Sachiko Kinoshita; Dennis Norris
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The nature of orthographic-phonological and orthographic-semantic relationships for Japanese kana and kanji words.

Authors:  Yasushi Hino; Shinobu Miyamura; Stephen J Lupker
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2011-12

6.  The processing advantage and disadvantage for homophones in lexical decision tasks.

Authors:  Yasushi Hino; Yuu Kusunose; Stephen J Lupker; Debra Jared
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles.

Authors:  Qing Cai; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The overlap model: a model of letter position coding.

Authors:  Pablo Gomez; Roger Ratcliff; Manuel Perea
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Extension of Nakagawa & Schielzeth's R2GLMM to random slopes models.

Authors:  Paul Cd Johnson
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 7.781

10.  Orthographic and phonological priming effects in the same-different task.

Authors:  Sachiko Kinoshita; Michael Gayed; Dennis Norris
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  1 in total

1.  Phonological precision for word recognition in skilled readers.

Authors:  Mahmoud M Elsherif; Linda Ruth Wheeldon; Steven Frisson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 2.138

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.