Literature DB >> 23567884

Alive and grasping: stable and rapid semantic access to an object category but not object graspability.

Ben D Amsel1, Thomas P Urbach, Marta Kutas.   

Abstract

How quickly do different kinds of conceptual knowledge become available following visual word perception? Resolving this question will inform neural and computational theories of visual word recognition and semantic memory use. We measured real-time brain activity using event-related brain potentials (ERPs) during a go/nogo task to determine the upper limit by which category-related knowledge (living/nonliving) and action-related knowledge (graspable/ungraspable) must have been accessed to influence a downstream decision process. We find that decision processes can be influenced by the living/nonliving distinction by 160ms after stimulus onset whereas information about (one-hand) graspability is not available before 300ms. We also provide evidence that rapid access to category-related knowledge occurs for all items, not just a subset of living, nonliving, graspable, or ungraspable ones, and for all participants regardless of their response speed. The latency of the N200 nogo effect by contrast is sensitive to decision speed. We propose a tentative hypothesis of the neural mechanisms underlying semantic access and a subsequent decision process.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23567884      PMCID: PMC3678357          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  86 in total

1.  The time course of visual processing: from early perception to decision-making.

Authors:  R VanRullen; S J Thorpe
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  A general mechanism for perceptual decision-making in the human brain.

Authors:  H R Heekeren; S Marrett; P A Bandettini; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Top-down facilitation of visual recognition.

Authors:  M Bar; K S Kassam; A S Ghuman; J Boshyan; A M Schmid; A M Schmidt; A M Dale; M S Hämäläinen; K Marinkovic; D L Schacter; B R Rosen; E Halgren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Word recognition in the human inferior temporal lobe.

Authors:  A C Nobre; T Allison; G McCarthy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-11-17       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition.

Authors:  Christopher Summerfield; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Watching the Word Go by: On the Time-course of Component Processes in Visual Word Recognition.

Authors:  Jonathan Grainger; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2009-01-01

7.  The time course of semantic richness effects in visual word recognition.

Authors:  Milena Rabovsky; Werner Sommer; Rasha Abdel Rahman
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The time-course of single-word reading: evidence from fast behavioral and brain responses.

Authors:  O Hauk; C Coutout; A Holden; Y Chen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  From perception to conception: how meaningful objects are processed over time.

Authors:  Alex Clarke; Kirsten I Taylor; Barry Devereux; Billi Randall; Lorraine K Tyler
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 10.  The time course of action and action-word comprehension in the human brain as revealed by neurophysiology.

Authors:  O Hauk; Y Shtyrov; F Pulvermüller
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2008-04-01
View more
  13 in total

1.  Never Seem to Find the Time: Evaluating the Physiological Time Course of Visual Word Recognition with Regression Analysis of Single Item ERPs.

Authors:  Sarah Laszlo; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2014

2.  Close, but no garlic: Perceptuomotor and event knowledge activation during language comprehension.

Authors:  Ben D Amsel; Katherine A DeLong; Marta Kutas
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  Empirically grounding grounded cognition: the case of color.

Authors:  Ben D Amsel; Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  A Thousand Words Are Worth a Picture: Snapshots of Printed-Word Processing in an Event-Related Potential Megastudy.

Authors:  Stéphane Dufau; Jonathan Grainger; Katherine J Midgley; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-11-02

5.  Connecting and considering: Electrophysiology provides insights into comprehension.

Authors:  Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Task modulation of brain responses in visual word recognition as studied using EEG/MEG and fMRI.

Authors:  Y Chen; M H Davis; F Pulvermüller; O Hauk
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  ERPs Differentially Reflect Automatic and Deliberate Processing of the Functional Manipulability of Objects.

Authors:  Christopher R Madan; Yvonne Y Chen; Anthony Singhal
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Action Priority: Early Neurophysiological Interaction of Conceptual and Motor Representations.

Authors:  Dirk Koester; Thomas Schack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Only time will tell - why temporal information is essential for our neuroscientific understanding of semantics.

Authors:  Olaf Hauk
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

10.  Movement priming of EEG/MEG brain responses for action-words characterizes the link between language and action.

Authors:  Giovanna Mollo; Friedemann Pulvermüller; Olaf Hauk
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 4.027

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.