Literature DB >> 22661912

Comparison of Four Different Shields for Birdcage-Type Coils with Experiments and Numerical Calculations.

Wanzhan Liu1, Shutong Zhang, Christopher M Collins, Jianli Wang, Michael B Smith.   

Abstract

Four 12-rung linear birdcage-type coils were built to experimentally examine the effects of the end-ring/shield configuration on radiofrequency magnetic field (B(1)) homogeneity and SNR at 125 MHz. The coil configurations include (a) a cylindrical shield (conventional), (b) a shield with annular extensions to closely shield the end-rings (surrounding shield), (c) a shield with annular extensions connected to the rungs (solid connection), and (d) a shield with radially oriented conductors connected to the rungs (radial connection). These coils were also modeled closely with finite difference time domain (FDTD) methods to corroborate experimental findings. Images of a human head were acquired, and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was measured on the central axial, sagittal, and coronal slices. B(1) field homogeneity in the unloaded coils was assessed on images of an oil phantom. Among the four configurations, the solid connection configuration has a lower SNR than the conventional configuration and the surrounding shield configuration but a higher SNR than the radial connection. Although there is no significant difference between the overall SNR of the conventional configuration and the surrounding shield configuration, the surrounding shield configuration has the potential to be tuned to higher frequencies than the conventional configuration. The conventional birdcage coil results in the most homogeneous B(1) field in the oil phantom. Numerical results are also compared with the experimental results.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 22661912      PMCID: PMC3363294          DOI: 10.1002/cmr.b.20073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng        ISSN: 1552-5031            Impact factor:   1.176


  7 in total

1.  7T vs. 4T: RF power, homogeneity, and signal-to-noise comparison in head images.

Authors:  J T Vaughan; M Garwood; C M Collins; W Liu; L DelaBarre; G Adriany; P Andersen; H Merkle; R Goebel; M B Smith; K Ugurbil
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  A microstrip transmission line volume coil for human head MR imaging at 4T.

Authors:  Xiaoliang Zhang; Kamil Ugurbil; Wei Chen
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Effects of end-ring/shield configuration on homogeneity and signal-to-noise ratio in a birdcage-type coil loaded with a human head.

Authors:  Wanzhan Liu; Christopher M Collins; Pamela J Delp; Michael B Smith
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  SAR and B1 field distributions in a heterogeneous human head model within a birdcage coil. Specific energy absorption rate.

Authors:  C M Collins; S Li; M B Smith
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Mutual Inductance in the Bird-Cage Resonator

Authors: 
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  RARE imaging: a fast imaging method for clinical MR.

Authors:  J Hennig; A Nauerth; H Friedburg
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  In vivo magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy of humans with a 4 T whole-body magnet.

Authors:  H Barfuss; H Fischer; D Hentschel; R Ladebeck; A Oppelt; R Wittig; W Duerr; R Oppelt
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.044

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.