Literature DB >> 17538084

Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica.

Wilco C Peul1, Hans C van Houwelingen, Wilbert B van den Hout, Ronald Brand, Just A H Eekhof, Joseph T J Tans, Ralph T W M Thomeer, Bart W Koes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lumbar-disk surgery often is performed in patients who have sciatica that does not resolve within 6 weeks, but the optimal timing of surgery is not known.
METHODS: We randomly assigned 283 patients who had had severe sciatica for 6 to 12 weeks to early surgery or to prolonged conservative treatment with surgery if needed. The primary outcomes were the score on the Roland Disability Questionnaire, the score on the visual-analogue scale for leg pain, and the patient's report of perceived recovery during the first year after randomization. Repeated-measures analysis according to the intention-to-treat principle was used to estimate the outcome curves for both groups.
RESULTS: Of 141 patients assigned to undergo early surgery, 125 (89%) underwent microdiskectomy after a mean of 2.2 weeks. Of 142 patients designated for conservative treatment, 55 (39%) were treated surgically after a mean of 18.7 weeks. There was no significant overall difference in disability scores during the first year (P=0.13). Relief of leg pain was faster for patients assigned to early surgery (P<0.001). Patients assigned to early surgery also reported a faster rate of perceived recovery (hazard ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.72 to 2.22; P<0.001). In both groups, however, the probability of perceived recovery after 1 year of follow-up was 95%.
CONCLUSIONS: The 1-year outcomes were similar for patients assigned to early surgery and those assigned to conservative treatment with eventual surgery if needed, but the rates of pain relief and of perceived recovery were faster for those assigned to early surgery. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN26872154 [controlled-trials.com].). Copyright 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17538084     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa064039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  171 in total

1.  The efficacy of minimally invasive discectomy compared with open discectomy: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Hormuzdiyar H Dasenbrock; Stephen P Juraschek; Lonni R Schultz; Timothy F Witham; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ali Bydon
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-03-09

Review 2.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal review: a survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2011.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Changes in the cross-sectional area of multifidus and psoas in unilateral sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Wook Ha Kim; Sang-Ho Lee; Dong Yeob Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2011-09-30

Review 4.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2011.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  A decade's experience in lumbar spine surgery in Belgium: sickness fund beneficiaries, 2000-2009.

Authors:  Marc Du Bois; Marek Szpalski; Peter Donceel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Spine surgery: Minimally invasive spinal surgery--does size matter?

Authors:  Richard Mannion
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 42.937

7.  Clinical outcomes of patients with lumbar disc herniation, selected for one-level open-discectomy and microdiscectomy.

Authors:  Kotryna Veresciagina; Bronius Spakauskas; Kazys Vytautas Ambrozaitis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  [Interventions on the intervertebral discs. Indications, techniques and evidence levels].

Authors:  F Streitparth; A C Disch
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 9.  Current application of cannabidiol (CBD) in the management and treatment of neurological disorders.

Authors:  Brian Fiani; Kasra John Sarhadi; Marisol Soula; Atif Zafar; Syed A Quadri
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.307

10.  Observer agreement in the choice of lumbar spine injection for pain management.

Authors:  Rene Balza; Sarah F Mercaldo; Connie Y Chang; Ambrose J Huang; Jad S Husseini; Arvin B Kheterpal; F Joseph Simeone; William E Palmer
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.